Type and screen: A safe and effective preoperative blood ordering policy with emphasis on its use in obstetrics and gynecology

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 142, Issue 5, 1982, Pages 563-567

  Patten, Ethel ^a   Alperin, Jack B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0020042555     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90762-1     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. The type and screen: A safe alternative and supplement in selected surgical procedurcs
2. Expected hemotherapy in elective surgen
3. The maximum surgical blood order schedule and surgical blood use in the United States
4. An analysis of surgical blood use in United States hospitals with application to the maximum surgical blood order schedule
5. Reorganization of blood ordering practices
6. Use of blood in elective surgery
7. Type and screen for elective surgery. Results of one year's experience in a small community hospital
8. Type and hold for better blood utilisation
9. A safe and practical blood ordering practice “type and screen,”
10. Routine compatibility testing. Standards of the AABB as applied to compatibility tests
11. The risk of abbreviating the major crossmatch in urgent or massive transfusion
12. Pretransfusion blood group serology. Limited value of the antiglobulin phase of the crossmatch when a careful screening for unexpected antibodies is performed
13. Incompatible crossmatch following negative antibody screen. Frequency and cause
14. Un-cross-matched blood for emergency transfusion. One year's experience in a civilian setting
15. Efficacy of type and screen in labor and delivery