Feedback and Optimal Sensitivity: Model Reference Transformations, Multiplicative Seminorms, and Approximate Inverses

IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1981, Pages 301-320

  Zames, G ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OPTIMIZATION;

CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0019559036     PISSN: 00189286     EISSN: 15582523     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.1981.1102603     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. H. W. Bode, Network Analysis and Feedback Amplifier Design. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1945.
2. M. Horowitz, Synthesis of Feedback Systems. New York: Academic, 1963.
3. G. Zames, “Nonlinear operators—Cascading inversion, and feedback” M.I.T., R. L. E., Quart. P.R., vol. 53, pp. 93–107, Apr. 1959.
4. —, “Nonlinear operators for system analysis,” Res. Lab. Electron., M.I.T. Tech. Rep. 370. Sept. 1960.
5. —, “functional analysis applied to nonlinear feedback systems,” IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory, vol. CT-10. pp. 392–404. Sept. 1963.
6. C. A. Desoer, “Nonlinear distortion in feedback amplifiers,” IRE Trans. Circuit Theory, vol. CT-9, pp. 2–6, Mar. 1962.
7. —, “Perturbation in the 1/0 map of a nonlinear feedback system caused by large plant perturbation,” J. Franklin Inst., vol. 306, pp. 225–235, Sept. 1978.
8. J. B. Cruz, Jr. and W. R. Perkins. “A new approach to the sensitivity problem in multivariable feedback system design.” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-9, pp. 216–223, 1964.
9. W. A. Porter and C. L. Zahm, “Basic concepts in system theory,” System Eng. Lab., Univ. of Michigan, Tech. Rep. 33, 1969.
10. R. M. Desantis and W. A. Porter “A generalized Nyquist plot and its use in sensitivity analysis,” Int. J. Syst. Sci. vol. 5–12, pp. 1143–1153, 1974.
11. J. C. Willems, The Analysis of Feedback Systems. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T., 1971.
12. G. Zames, “Feedback hierarchies and complexity,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision Contr., Dec. 1976, addenda.
13. —, “On the metric complexity of causal linear systems, ∊-entropy and ∊-dimension for continuous time,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-12, pp. 222–230, 1979.
14. —, “Realizability conditions for nonlinear feedback systems,” IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory, vol. CT-11, pp. 186–194, June 1964.
15. R. G. Douglas, Banach Algebra Techniques in Operator Theory. New York: Academic, 1972.
16. B. A. Francis and W. M. Wonham “The internal model principle for linear multivariable regulators,” J. Appl. Math. Optimiz., vol. 2, pp. 170–194, 1975.
17. D. M. Bensoussan. “High-gain feedback and sensitivity,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dep. Elec. Eng., McGill Univ., to appear.
18. A. K. El-Sakkary, “The gap metric for unstable systems.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dep. Elec. Eng., McGill Univ.; also in G. Zames and A. K. El-Sakkary, Proc. 18th Allerton Conf., Oct. 1980.
19. M. A. Naimark, Normed Rings. Groningen: Noordhooff, 1964.
20. A. Feintuch, “Strong Causality Conditions and Causal Invertibility,” SIAM J. Contr. Optimiz., vol. 18, pp. 317–324, May 1980.
21. C. A. Desoer and W. S. Chan “Feedback interconnection of lumped linear time invariant systems,” J. Franklin Inst., vol. 300, pp. 335–351, 1975.
22. W. Rudin, Functional Analysis. New York: McGraw Hill, 1973.
23. G. Zames, “Feedback and optimal sensitivity: Model reference transformations, weighted seminorms, and approximate inverses,” in Proc. 17th Allerton Conf., Oct. 1979, pp. 744–752.