Continuous Phase Modulation—Part I: Full Response Signaling

IEEE Transactions on Communications

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1981, Pages 196-209

  Aulin, Tor ^a   Sundberg, Carl Erik W ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHASE MODULATION;

DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 0019548074     PISSN: 00906778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TCOM.1981.1095001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. V. A. Kotelnikov, The Theory of Optimum Noise Immunity. New York: Dover, 1960.
2. R. R. Anderson and J. Salz, “Spectra of digital FM,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 44, pp. 1165–1 189, July-Aug. 1965.
3. J. M. Wozencraft and I. M. Jacobs, Principles of Communication Engineering. New York: Wiley, 1965.
4. R. W. Lucky, J. Salz, and E. J. Weldon, Jr. Principles of Data Communication. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.
5. M. G. Pelchat, R. C. Davis, and M. B. Luntz, “Coherent demodulation of continuous phase binary FSK signals,” in Proc. Int. Telemetering Conf., Washington, DC, 1971, pp. 181—i90.
6. R. deBuda, “Coherent demodulation of frequency-shift keying with low deviation ratio,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-20, pp. 429–436, June 1972.
7. W. P. Osborne and M. B. Luntz, “Coherent and noncoherent detection of CPFSK,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-22, pp. 1023–1036, Aug. 1974.
8. T. J. Baker, “Asymptotic behaviour of digital FM spectra,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-22, 1585–1594, Oct. 1974.
9. W. C. Lindsey and M. K. Simon, Telecommunication Systems Engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
10. T. A. Schonhoff, “Symbol error probabilities for M-ary coherent continuous phase frequency-shift keying (CPFSK),” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Conf. Record, San Francisco, CA, 1975. pp. 34.5-34.8.
11. T. A. Schonhoff, “Bandwidth vs performance considerations for CPFSK,” in Proc. IEEE National Telecommun. Conf. Record, 1975, pp. 38.1-38.5.
12. F. Amoroso, “Pulse and spectrum manipulation in the minimum (frequency) shift keying (MSK) format,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-24, pp. 381–384, Mar. 1976.
13. T. A. Schonhoff, “Symbol error probabilities for M-ary CPFSK: Coherent and noncoherent detection,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-24, pp. 644–652, June 1976.
14. M. K. Simon, “A generalization of the minimum-shift-keying (MSK)-type signaling based upon input data symbol pulse shaping,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-24, pp. 845–856, Aug. 1976.
15. M. Rabzel and S. Pasupathy, “Spectral shaping in minimum shift keying (MSK) type signals,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-26, pp, 189-195, Jan. 1978.
16. T. Aulin and C-E. Sundberg, “Binary CPFSK type of signaling with input data symbol pulse shaping—Error probability and spectrum,” Telecommunication Theory, Techn. Rep. TR-99, Univ. Lund, Lund, Sweden, July 1978.
17. “M-ary CPFSK type of signaling with input data symbol pulse shaping—Minimum distance and spectrum,” Telecommunication Theory, Techn. Rep. TR-111, Univ. Lund, Lund, Sweden, Aug. 1978.
18. “Bounds on the performance of binary CPFSK type of signaling with input data symbol pulse shaping,” in Proc. IEEE Nat. Telecommun. Conf. Record, Birmingham, AL, 1978, pp. 6.5.1-6.5.5.
19. “M-ary CPFSK type of signaling with input data symbol pulse shaping — Minimum distance and spectrum,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Conf. Record, Boston, MA, 1979, pp. 42.3.1- 42.3, 6.
20. T. Aulin, “CPM—A power and bandwidth efficient digital constant envelope modulation scheme,” Dr. Techn. dissertation, Telecommunication Theory, Univ. Lund, Lund, Sweden, Nov. 1979.
21. T. Aulin, N. Rydbeck, and C.E. W. Sundberg, “Continuous phase modulation—Part II: Partial response signaling,” this issue, pp. 210–225.