The Effects of Variations of the Conducting Media Inhomogeneities on the Electroretinogram

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn BME-27, Issue 2, 1980, Pages 88-94

  Doslak, Michael J ^a,b   Plonsey, Robert ^c   Thomas, Cecil W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING - BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS; ELECTRIC FIELDS - MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; RETINAL LIGHT STIMULATION;

VISION;

ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RABBITS; RETINA; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0018910682     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: 15582531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.1980.326712     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. C. A. T. Krakau, “On the potential field of the rabbit electroretinogram,” Acta Ophth., vol. 36, pp. 183–207,1958.
2. R. W. Rodieck and R. W. Ford, “The cat local electroretinogram to incremental stimuli,” Vision Res., vol. 9, pp. 1–24, 1969.
3. R. Plonsey and D. Heppner, “Principles and applications of electromagnetic fields,” Bull. Math. Biophys., vol. 29, pp. 657–664, 1967.
4. M. J. Doslak, “The effects of variations of the conducting media inhomogeneities on the electroretinogram,” Ph.D. dissertation, Case Western Reserve Univ., Cleveland, OH, 1978. (For copies, contact University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.).
5. G. B. Arden and E. O. Brown, “Some properties of components of the cat electroretinogram revealed by local recording under oil,”J. Physiol., vol. 176, pp. 429–461,1965.
6. A. L. Byzov, “Analysis of distribution of potentials and currents within the retina on light stimulation–II. Passive distribution of potentials and currents within the retina as in a volume conductor,” Biofizica, vol. 5, pp. 328–337, 1960.
7. D. S. Faber, “Analysis of the slow transretinal potentials in response to light,” Ph.D. dissertation, State Univ. New York, Buffalo, NY, 1969.
8. J. Levett, “Dipole studies: Intraretinal b- and d-wave potential fields,” Vision Res., vol. 14, pp. 895–897, 1974.
9. T. Tomita, “The electroretinogram, as analyzed by microelectrode studies,” in Physiology of Photoreceptor Organs, M. G. F. Fourtes, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1972.
10. M. Klee and R. Plonsey, “Finite difference solution for biopotentials of axially symmetric cells,” Biophys. J., vol. 12, pp. 1661– 1675,1972.
11. G. E. Forsythe and W. R. Wasow, Finite-Difference Methods for Partial Differential Equations. New York: Wiley, 1960.
12. R. S. Varga, Matrix Iterative Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1962.
13. D. M. Young, Iterative Solution of Large Linear Systems. New York: Academic,1 1971.
14. J. Levett, “Nonlinear behavior in the frequency response of the rabbit retina,” Ophth. Res., vol. 5, pp. 353–361, 1973.
15. A. Troelstra and N. M. J. Schweitzer, “Nonlinear analysis of electroretinographic b wave in man,” J. Neurophysiol., vol. 3, pp. 588–606, 1968.
16. L. H. van der Tweel, “Some problems in vision regarded with respect to linearity and frequency response,” Ann. I. O. Acad. Sci., vol. 89, pp. 829–856, 1961.
17. R. E. Poppele and L. Maffei, “Frequency analysis of the electroretinogram,” J. Neurophysiol., vol. 30, pp. 982–992, 1967.
18. E. Sundmark, “III. Recording of the human electroretinogram with the contact glass,” Acta Ophth., suppl. 52, pp. 22–40, 1959.
19. —, “Recording of the human electroretinogram with the contact glass, II. Potential drops between the retina and electrodes,” Acta Ophth., vol. 36, pp. 829–836, 1958.