Decline in Duodenal Ulcer Surgery

JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 237, Issue 10, 1977, Pages 987-988

  Smith, Meredith P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DUODENUM ULCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PEPTIC ULCER; STOMACH SURGERY; THERAPY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; DUODENAL ULCER; HUMAN; PEPTIC ULCER PERFORATION; STRESS; URBANIZATION; WASHINGTON;

EID: 0017354627     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1977.03270370059023     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Pulvertaft CN: Peptic ulcer in town and country. Br J Prev Soc Med 13:131-138, 1959.
2. Susser M, Stein Z: Civilization and peptic ulcer. Lancet 1:115-119, 1962.
3. Sanders R: Incidence of perforated duodenal and gastric ulcer in Oxford. Gut 8:58-63, 1967.
4. Pulvertaft CN: Comments on the incidence and natural history of gastric and duodenal ulcer. Postgrad Med J 44:597-602, 1968.
5. Monson RR, MacMahon B: Peptic ulcer in Massachusetts physicians. N Engl J Med 281:11-15, 1969.
6. Arie T: The decline of duodenal ulcer. Med Trends Psychosom Med 2:164-171, 1970.
7. Mendeloff AI: What has been happening to duodenal ulcer? Gastroenterology 67:1020-1022, 1974.
8. Jennings D: Perforated peptic ulcer: Changes in age, incidence, and sex distribution in the past 150 years. Lancet 1:395-398, 444-447, 1940.
9. Wastell C: Chronic Duodenal Ulcer. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts Inc, 1972, pp 3-19.