Comparison of different methods of determining cell viability after exposure to cytotoxic compounds

Experimental Cell Research

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 1976, Pages 275-280

  Bhuyan, B K ^a   Loughman, B E ^a   Fraser, T J ^a   Day, K J ^a  

^a PFIZER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHOTERICIN B; CARMUSTINE; CHLORAMBUCIL; CHLORMETHINE; CYTARABINE; DACTINOMYCIN; DEOXYCHOLATE SODIUM; DOXORUBICIN; NOGALAMYCIN; PACTAMYCIN; SODIUM CHROMATE CR 51; TRYPSIN; TUBERCIDIN; VINCRISTINE; VINCRISTINE SULFATE;

CELL LINE; CELL SURVIVAL; CELL VIABILITY; CYTOTOXICITY; DRUG TOXICITY; IN VITRO STUDY; LEUKEMIA CELL; THEORETICAL STUDY;

AMPHOTERICIN B; ANTIBIOTICS, ANTINEOPLASTIC; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; CARMUSTINE; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHLORAMBUCIL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTARABINE; CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; DOXORUBICIN; MECHLORETHAMINE; NOGALAMYCIN; PACTAMYCIN; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.; TUBERCIDIN; VINCRISTINE;

EID: 0017234880     PISSN: 00144827     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90617-0     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. The in vivo reproductive potential of density separated cells
2. Specific G2 phase toxicity of chloramphenicol on mouse leukemic cells (L5178Y)