|
Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1976, Pages 903-938
|
Privacy and public funding: Maher v. Roe as the interaction of Roe v. Wade and Dandridge v. Williams.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DUE PROCESS;
ARTICLE;
CONSCIENCE;
ECONOMICS;
EQUAL PROTECTION;
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;
GOVERNMENT;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
INDIGENTS;
INDUCED ABORTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
POVERTY;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
STATE INTEREST;
DUE PROCESS;
EQUAL PROTECTION;
INDIGENTS;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION;
STATE INTEREST;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CONSCIENCE;
ECONOMICS;
FINANCING, GOVERNMENT;
HEALTH CARE RATIONING;
JURISPRUDENCE;
POVERTY;
PREJUDICE;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
|
EID: 0017207528
PISSN: 0004153X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (1)
|
References (0)
|