Maximum Likelihood Receiver for Multiple Channel Transmission Systems

IEEE Transactions on Communications

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1976, Pages 276-283

  Van Etten, W ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 0016919176     PISSN: 00906778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TCOM.1976.1093265     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. D. A. Shnidman, “A generalized Nyquist criterion and optimum linear receiver for a pulse modulation system,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 46, pp. 2163-2177, Nov. 1967.
2. A. R. Kaye and D. A. George, “Transmission of multiplexed PAM signals over multiple channel and diversity systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun. Technol., vol. COM-18, pp. 520-526, Oct. 1970.
3. W. van Etten, “An optimum linear receiver for multiple channel digital transmission systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun. ‘Concise Papers’, vol. COM-23, pp. 828-834, Aug. 1975.
4. G. D. Forney, Jr., “Maximum-likelihood sequence estimation of digital sequences in the presence of intersymbol interference,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-18, pp. 363-378, May 1972.
5. J. K. Omura, “Optimal receiver design for convolutional codes and channels with memory via control theoretical concepts,” Inform. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 243-266, 1971.
6. G. Ungerboeck, “Adaptive maximum-likelihood receiver for carrier-modulated data-transmission systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-22, pp. 624-636, May 1974.
7. J. M. Wozencraft and I. M. Jacobs, Principles of Communication Engineering. New York: Wiley, 1965.
8. D. N. Prabhakar Murthy, “Factorization of discrete-process spectral matrices,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory ‘Corresp.’, vol. IT-19, pp. 693-696, Sept. 1973.
9. P. R. Motyka and J. A. Cadzow, “The factorization of discrete-process spectral matrices,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-12, pp. 698-707, Dec. 1967.
10. F. B. Hildebrand, Methods of Applied Mathematics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1952.