|
Volumn 59, Issue 8, 1972, Pages 605-608
|
A randomized prospective trial comparing three established methods of gastric decompression after vagotomy
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
ATTITUDE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION;
DUODENUM ULCER;
DYSPHAGIA;
ELECTROLYTE BALANCE;
FEMALE;
GASTROSTOMY;
HUMAN;
MALE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION;
SMOKING;
STOMACH;
STOMACH ULCER;
SURGICAL INFECTION;
TECHNIQUE;
VAGOTOMY;
WOUND DRAINAGE;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ATTITUDE TO HEALTH;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DEGLUTITION DISORDERS;
DRAINAGE;
DUODENAL ULCER;
FEMALE;
GASTROSTOMY;
HUMAN;
INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL;
MALE;
METHODS;
MIDDLE AGE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONS;
SMOKING;
STOMACH;
STOMACH ULCER;
SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION;
VAGOTOMY;
WATER-ELECTROLYTE BALANCE;
|
EID: 0015383278
PISSN: 00071323
EISSN: 13652168
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800590806 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (26)
|
References (8)
|