Unconstrained Inverse Electrocardiography : Epicardial Potentials

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn BME-19, Issue 4, 1972, Pages 276-285

  Martin, Richard O ^a   Pilkington, Theo C ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; MATHEMATICS; PERICARDIUM;

ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PERICARDIUM;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES - INTEGRAL EQUATIONS;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 0015360629     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: 15582531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.1972.324070     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. D.B. Geselowitz, “The concept of an equivalent cardiac generator,” in Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, vol. 1. New York: Plenum, 1963, p. 325.
2. M. Lynn et al, “A proposed method for the inverse problem in electrocardiography,” Biophys. J., vol. 7, p. 925, 1967.
3. R. Plonsey and D.B. Heppner, “Considerations of quasi-station-arity in electrophysiological systems,” Bull Math. Biophys., vol. 29, p. 4, 1967.
4. J.A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1941.
5. W.R. Smythe, Static and Dynamic Electricity, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.
6. A. O'Rahilly, Electromagnetic Theory. New York: Dover, 1955.
7. T.C. Pilkington, R.C. Barr, and C.L. Rogers, “Effect of conductivity interfaces,” Bull. Math. Biophys., vol. 29, p. 705, 1967.
8. T.C. Pilkington, R.C. Barr, and C.L. Rogers, “Effect of conductivity interfaces in electrocardiography,” Bull. Math. Biophys., vol. 30, p. 637, 1968.
9. E. Weber, Electromagnetic Theory: Static Fields and Their Mapping. New York: Dover, 1965.
10. O. Kellog, Foundations of Potential Theory. New York: Dover, 1953.
11. E. Goursat, A Course in Mathematical Analysis, vol. HI, pt. 2. New York: Dover, 1964.
12. S.G. Mikhlin, Linear Integral Equations. Delhi, India: Hindustan Publishing Corp., 1960.
13. C. Lanczos, Applied Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1956.
14. A. Ralston, A First Course in Numerical Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
15. R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics, vol. 1. New York: Interscience, 1953.
16. P.M. Morse and H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, pts. I and II. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1953.
17. S. Twomey, “The application of numerical filtering to the solution of integral equations encountered in indirect sensing measurements,” J. Franklin Inst., vol. 279, no. 2, p. 95, 1965.
18. R. Bellman, “A new technique for the numerical solution of Fredholm integral equations,” Computing, vol. 3, p. 131, 1967.
19. P.D. Crout, “An application of polynomial approximation to the solution of integral equations arising in physical problems,” J. Math. Phys., vol. 19, p. 34, 1940.
20. W.R. Dixon and J.H. Aitken, “The resolution correction in the scintillation spectrometry of continuous X-rays,” Canadian J. Phys., vol. 36, p. 1624, 1958.
21. J. Douglas, “Mathematical programming and integral equations,” presented at Symp., Provisional International Computation Centre, 1960. |
22. L. Fox and E.T. Goodwin, “The numerical solution of non-singular linear integral equations,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A-245, p. 62, 1953.
23. F.B. Hildebrand and P.D. Crout, “A least square procedure for solving integral equations by polynomial approximation,” J. Math. Phys., vol. 20, p. 310, 1941.
24. G. Kreisel, “Some remarks on integral equations with kernels,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Math. Phys. Sci., Ser. A-197, p. 160, 1949.
25. A. Reiz, “On the numerical solution of certain types of integral equations,” Ark. Mat. Astron. Fys., vol. 29A, no. 29, p. 1, 1943.
26. A. Young, “The application of approximate product-integration to the numerical solution of integral equations,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A-224, p. 561, 1954.
27. D.L. Phillips, “A technique for the numerical solution of certain integral equations of the first kind,” J. Assoc. Comp. Mach., vol. 9, p. 84, 1962.
28. M.E. Van Valkenburg, Network Analysis, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.
29. S. Goldman, Information Theory. New York: Dover, 1968.
30. M.C. Pease, Methods of Matrix Algebra. New York: Academic, 1965.
31. J.H. Wilkinson, The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem. Oxford, England: Oxford Univ. Press, 1965.
32. H. Bremermann, Distributions, Complex Variables, and Fourier Transforms. Reading, Mass. : Addison-Wesley, 1965.
33. F. Schied, Numerical Analysis-Schaum's Outline. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.
34. R.O. Martin, “Inverse electrocardiography: Epicardial potentials,” Ph.D. dissertation, Duke Univ., Durham, N.C., 1970.
35. L. Zablow, “An equivalent cardiac generator which preserves topography,” Biophys. J., vol. 6, p. 535, 1966.
36. C.L. Rogers and T.C. Pilkington, “Free-moment current dipoles in inverse electrocardiography,” IEEE Trans. Bio-Med. Eng, vol. BME-15, pp. 312–323, Oct. 1968.
37. D.A. Brody, J.C. Bradshaw, and J.W. Evans, “The elements of an electrocardiographic lead tensor theory,” Bull. Math. Biophys., vol. 23, pp. 31–42, Mar. 1961.
38. D.B. Geselowitz, “Multipole representation for an equivalent cardiac generator,” Proc. IRE, vol. 48, pp. 75–79, Jan. 1960