Magnetic domain structures in thin uniaxial plates with perpendicular easy axis

Journal of Applied Physics

Volumn 42, Issue 13, 1971, Pages 5732-5756

  Cape, J A ^a   Lehman, G W ^a  

^a Rockwell International   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAGNETISM;

FILMS--MAGNETIC;

EID: 0015206373     PISSN: 00218979     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1660007     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. The thickness effects are discussed in
2. We shall use the word “stripe” throughout this paper, though these domains are also variously called “strips”, “ribbons”, “snakes”, and “worms” and the over-all array (c.f., Fig. 16) of the stripe domains has been called the “maze”, “fingerprint”, “serpentine”, or “labyrinth” pattern.
3. For a general discussion, see
4. Some calculations similar to and in agreement with the present calculation were presented by
5. The “wall” shape is given by [formula omitted] tanh (x/δ).
6. The shape of the walls has been discussed by
7. see also Ref. 15.
8. As a result of a transcription error, the factor of 4 in the sum of Eq. (25) was omitted in Eq. (3) of Ref. 14. The numerical results quoted in Ref. 14 are correct nevertheless because the Ewald procedure described in this paper was used for the numerical computations.
9. reality, it is likely that Néel-like wall structures set in at small h/ξ so that the present model is then no longer adequate.
10. See, for example
11. The nominal formula was [formula omitted]
12. Sample-holder-coil assembly had a long (several minutes) “time constant” for heating and cooling. Consequently, we were able to satisfy ourselves that our observations were sensibly isothermal.
13. Reference 41, p. 390, Put [formula omitted] in Eq. (1), substitute [formula omitted] for φ, Let [formula omitted] [formula omitted] then one can obtain Eq. (C22) readily by using [formula omitted]