-
7
-
-
84918213580
-
-
Playfair expressed the view that ‘all certain and accurate knowledge of the laws of nature is derived’ from induction, Edinburgh, This commitment, which is implicit in the writings of a number of Scottish moral and natural philosophers, militates against Hume's metaphysical views on causation.
-
(1819)
Outlines of Natural Philosophy
, vol.1
, pp. 2
-
-
-
8
-
-
84918213579
-
-
Newton, Opticks, Book 1, Prop. 2, Theor. 2
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
0003667667
-
-
My italics. Cf., first edition, Edinburgh, ‘The experience of all ages shows how prone ingenious men have been to invent hypotheses to explain the phenomena of nature; how fond, by a kind of anticipation, to discover her secrets…. Instead of a slow and gradual ascent…by a just and copious induction, they would shorten the work, and by a flight of genius, get to the top at once.’
-
(1785)
Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man
, pp. 662
-
-
Reid1
-
14
-
-
0004040921
-
Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science
-
Oxford, Chapter VI. I should like to thank Gerd Buchdahl for bringing his analysis of Hume to my notice and also for his helpful comments on a draft of this paper.
-
(1969)
Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science
-
-
Buchdahl1
-
17
-
-
0040781456
-
Thomas Reid and the Newtonian Turn of British Methodological Thought
-
R.E. Butts, J.W. Davis, Toronto, In this article Laudan discusses Reid's objections to hypotheses under the following headings: ‘As a matter of historical fact, hypotheses and conjectures have not been very productive, and have tended to mislead rather than enlighten us.’ ‘The adoption of an hypothesis prejudices the impartiality of the scientist.’ ‘The hypothetical method presupposes a greater simplicity in nature than we find there.’ ‘The use of hypotheses assumes that man's reason is capable of understanding the works of God.’ ‘Hypotheses can never be proved by “reductio” methods.’ ‘The use of hypotheses usually violates Newton's first “Regula Philosophandi”.’ ‘The hypothetical method substitutes premature theoretical ingenuity for painstaking experimental rigour.”
-
(1970)
The Methodological Heritage of Newton
, pp. 103-131
-
-
Laudan1
-
23
-
-
84918213573
-
Sir John Leslie, 1766–1832
-
See also, interesting, 15th edition, Harvard University
-
(1967)
PhD thesis
-
-
Olson1
-
26
-
-
0004300731
-
-
15th edition, note 23, Reid had also mentioned that hypotheses might be useful in natural philosophy, but these references were generally ignored beside his tirade against hypotheses.
-
(1845)
Lectures on the Philosophy of the Human Mind
, pp. 47
-
-
Brown1
-
40
-
-
84918213573
-
Sir John Leslie, 1766–1832
-
For Boscovich's influence on Robison see Olson, interesting, first edition, Harvard University, note 22
-
(1967)
PhD thesis
-
-
Olson1
-
41
-
-
0346831717
-
The Reception of Boscovich's Ideas in Scotland
-
(1969)
Isis
, vol.60
, pp. 91-103
-
-
Olson1
-
42
-
-
84918213569
-
Observations on the Hypotheses which have been assumed to account for the Cause of Gravitation from Mechanical Principles
-
review of
-
(1808)
Edinburgh Review
, vol.13
, pp. 101-116
-
-
Playfair1
Vince2
-
46
-
-
84918240622
-
-
freely paraphrasing Newton's Advertisement II to, second English edition, see op. cit., note 12, 87, ‘Lest anyone should think that I place gravity among the essential properties of bodies, I have subjoined one question concerning its cause; a question, I say, for I do not hold it as a thing established.’
-
(1717)
Optiks
-
-
Reid1
-
50
-
-
0008582952
-
-
quoted in, Edinburgh, Airy introduced the wave theory of light into his lectures at Cambridge in 1828.
-
(1961)
The Democratic Intellect
, pp. 173-174
-
-
Davie1
-
55
-
-
84918213564
-
-
Brougham interpreted Newton's term ‘rays of different reflexibility’ to denote that in reflection from a body of small radius of curvature, the angle of incidence is not equal to the angle of reflection but depends on the colour of the ray. He believed that this ‘phenomenon’ was caused by the same forces which he used to explain diffraction and refraction. Brougham was taken to task on this point by Prévost
-
(1798)
Phil. Trans.
, vol.88
, pp. 321
-
-
-
58
-
-
84918213563
-
-
The original paper which Brougham submitted to the Royal Society contained a section entitled ‘Queries’. At the request of Sir Charles Blagden, Brougham revised his paper and omitted this section, part of which may have been included in the closing pages of
-
-
-
-
62
-
-
34249734861
-
-
review of Young, ‘On the Theory of Light and Colours’, note 63, note 65, However, Brougham considered that ‘if…we condescend to amuse ourselves’ by feigning a hypothesis, then the ‘hypothesis shall be so consistent with itself, and so applicable to the facts, as not to require perpetual mending and patching’.
-
(1803)
Edinburgh Review
, vol.1
, pp. 452
-
-
Brougham1
-
69
-
-
84918210555
-
An Account of some Cases of the Production of Colours not hitherto Described
-
(1803)
Edinburgh Review
, vol.1
, pp. 457-460
-
-
Brougham1
-
70
-
-
84918213560
-
-
review of Young, ‘An Account of some Cases of the Production of Colours not hitherto Described’, ‘Can anything be more evident than that this appearance [of the white spot at the centre of Newton's rings] is precisely the one described, at least a dozen times in the Optics?’
-
(1803)
Edinburgh Review
, vol.1
, pp. 458
-
-
Brougham1
-
71
-
-
0001740694
-
An Account of some Cases of the Production of Colours not hitherto Described
-
note 64
-
(1802)
Phil. Trans.
, vol.92
, pp. 395-396
-
-
Young1
-
72
-
-
84918213560
-
-
review of Young, ‘An Account of some Cases of the Production of Colours not hitherto Described’, note 66
-
(1803)
Edinburgh Review
, vol.1
, pp. 458
-
-
Brougham1
-
73
-
-
0002981034
-
Experiments and Calculations relative to Physical Optics
-
Francis Horner considered this paper to be ‘a new attack upon Brougham by Doctor Thomas Young; it is feeble to a contemptible degree, but Brougham should not have used all the expressions of contempt in which he has indulged himself’. Horner Correspondence, ii, f. 54. I am grateful to the Librarian of the British Library of Political and Economic Science, for permitting me to reproduce this extract.
-
(1804)
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London
, vol.94
, pp. 1-16
-
-
Young1
-
74
-
-
84918193704
-
Experiments and Calculations relative to Physical Optics
-
review of Young
-
(1804)
Edinburgh Review
, vol.5
, pp. 97-103
-
-
Brougham1
|
