The problem with design reuse: An investigation into outcomes and antecedents

Journal of Engineering Design

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 277-296

  Busby, J S ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013405597     PISSN: 09544828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/095448299261335     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. MURDOCH, T.N.S., BALL, N.R. & MATTHEWS, P.C. (1997) Constraint based templates for design re-use, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design ICED97, Tampere, 19-21 August, pp. 267-270.
2. ARAYA, A.A. & IBRAHIM, N.A. (1994) Advancing quality function deployment with case-based capabilities, Journal of Design and Manufacturing, 4, pp. 265-280.
3. SYCARA, K.P. & NAVINCHANDRA, D. (1989) Integrating case-based reasoning and qualitative reasoning in engineering design, in: GERO, J.S. (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Design, pp. 231-250 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag).
4. CULVERHOUSE, P.F. (1995) Product books: archiving for information use and reuse, a replacement for CAD databases, Journal of Design and Manufacturing, 5, pp. 13-24.
5. DUFFY, S.M., DUFFY, A.H.B. & MACCALLUM, K.J. (1995) A design reuse model, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design ICED95, Prague, 22-24 August, pp. 490-495.
6. BALL, L.J. (1997) Personal communication.
7. KHADILKAR, D.V. & STAUFFER, L.A. (1996) An experimental evaluation of design information reuse during conceptual design, Journal of Engineering Design, 7, pp. 331-339.
8. FRAKES, W.B. & Fox, C.J. (1996) Quality improvement using a software reuse failure modes model, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22, pp. 274-279.
9. GEARY, K. (1988) The practicalities of introducing large-scale software reuse, Software Engineering Journal, 3, pp. 172-176.
10. JACKSON, D. & JACKSON, M. (1996) Problem decomposition for reuse, Software Engineering Journal, 11, pp. 19-30.
11. MILI, H., MILI, F. & MILI, A. (1995) Reusing software: issues and research directions, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21, pp. 528-562.
12. WOODFIELD, S.N., EMBLEY, D.W. & SCOTT, D.T. (1987) Can programmers reuse software?, IEEE Software, July, pp. 52-60.
13. BUSBY, J.S. (1998a) Causal explanations of reuse failure, Proceedings of the Engineering Design Conference EDC98, London 21-24 June, pp. 475-482.
14. BUSBY, J.S. (1998b) Effective practices in design transfer, Research in Engineering Design 10, pp. 178-188.
15. SIMON, H.A. (1981) The Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd edition, p. 16 (Cambridge, MA, the MIT Press).
16. STUBBS, M. (1983) Discourse Analysis. The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language, p. 239 (Oxford, Basil Blackwell).
17. GLASER, B.G. & STRAUSS, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research (New York, Aldine Publishing).
18. LANDY, F.J. & FARR, J.L. (1980) Performance rating, Psychological Bulletin, 87, pp. 72-107.
19. FELDMAN, J.M. (1981) Beyond attribution theory: cognitive processes in performance appraisal, Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, pp. 127-148.
20. TVERSKY, A. & KAHNEMAN, D. (1982) Causal schemas in judgments under uncertainty, in: KAHNEMAN, D., SLOVIC, P. & TVERSKY, A. (Eds) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, pp. 117-128 (Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press).
21. TVERSKY, A. & KAHNEMAN, D. (1982) Belief in the law of small numbers, in: KAHNEMAN, D., SLOVIC, P. & TVERSKY, A. (Eds) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, pp. 23-31 (Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press).
22. VISSER, W. (1990) More or less following a plan during design: opportunistic deviations in specification, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 33, pp. 247-278.
23. GUINDON, R. (1990) Designing the design process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts, Human-Computer Interaction, 5, pp. 305-344.
24. MCLEAN, A., YOUNG, R.M., BELLOTTI, V.M.E. & MORAN, T.P. (1996) Questions, options, and criteria: elements of design space analysis, in: MORAN, T.P. & CARROLL, J.M. (Eds) Design Rationale. Concepts, Techniques and Use, pp. 53-105 (Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum).
25. CONKLIN, E.J. & BURGESS-YAKEMOVIC, K.C. (1996) A process-oriented approach to design rationale, in: MORAN, T.P. & CARROLL, J.M. (Eds) Design Rationale. Concepts, Techniques and Use, pp. 393-427 (Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum).
26. HOWARD, G.S. (1994) Why do people say nasty things about self-reports?, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, pp. 399-404.