Bibliometrics and internet: Some observations and expectations

Scientometrics

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 59-63

  Van Raan, Anthony F J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013403573     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005690102069     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. L. EGGHE (2000). New informetric aspects of the Internet: some reflections - many problems. Journal of Information Science, 26 (5) 329-335.
2. J. LANGER (2000). Do string theorists need the Physical Review? Physics Today, 53 (8) 35-38.
3. E. C. M. NOYONS, A. F. J. VAN RAAN (1998). Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective. Self-organized structuring to map neural network research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS), 49 (1) 68-81.
4. R. W. POULTNEY (1996). Front-Ends are the way to go. Europhysics News, 27:24-25.
5. A. F. J. VAN RAAN (1997). The future of the quality assurance system. Its impact on the social and professional recognition of scientists in the era of electronic publishing. Journal of Information Science, 23 (6) 445-450.
6. A. F. J. VAN RAAN (2000a). On growth, ageing and fractal differentiation of science. Scientometrics, 47 (2) 347-362.
7. A. F. J. VAN RAAN (2000b). Competition amongst scientists for publication status. Toward a model of scientific publication and citation distributions. To be published.
8. H. E. ROOSENDAAL (1995). Roles of bibliometrics in scientific communication. Research Evaluation, 5:237-241.
9. H. E. ROOSENDAAL (1996). Scientific Communication and the Science Process. Proceedings of the International Summer School on the Digital Library. Tilburg: TICER.
10. D. VOSS (2000). Data networks: scientists weave new-style webs to tame the information glut, Science, 289 (5488) 2250-2251.