Federal policy in local context: The influence of local state-societal relations on endangered species act implementation

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 212-240

  Davidson, Debra J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b University of Msconsin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013384730     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: 15411338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2001.tb00974.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ascher, W. (1995). Communities and sustainable forestry in developing countries. San Francisco: ICS Press.
2. Baland, J.M. & Platteau, J.P. (1996). Halting degradation of natural resources. Is there a role for rural communities? Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. Beedy, E. C. (1995). Ten ways to fix the Endangered Species Act. Endangered Species UPDATE 12(6), 12–14.
4. Buttel, F. (1998). Some observations on states, world orders, and the politics of sustainability. Organization & Environment 11(3), 261–286.
5. California Department of Fish and Game. (1991). Status review of the marbled murrelet. Sacramento: California Resources Agency.
6. Chazan, N. (1994). “Engaging the state: Associational life in sub-Saharan Africa,” In Migdal, J. S., Kohli, A. & Shue, V. (eds.), State power and social forces: Domination and transformation in the Third World, 255–292. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Clark, R.N. and G.H. Stankey. (1976). Analyzing public input to resource decisions: Criteria, principles and case examples of the CODINVOLVE system. Natural Resources Journal, 16, 213–236.
8. Clarke, J. W. & McCool, D. (1996). Staking out the terrain: Power and performance among natural resource agencies (2nd ed.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
9. Davidson, D. J. (1999). Implementing the Endangered Species Act on private land in the coastal redwoods: Apolitical-sociological analysis of environmental bureaucracies. Dissertation. Univeristy of Wisconsin-Madison.
10. Dennis, S. (1988). Incorporating public opinion surveys in National Forest land and resource planning. Society and Natural Resources, 1, 309–316.
11. Elkins, C. (1999). Maxxam's lawless logging in perspective. Wild California, Newsletter of the Environmental Protection Information Center (Spring), 6. Garberville, CA.
12. Environmental Protection Information Center, (1999). EPIC's Summary and Critique of the Pacific Lumber Habitat Conservation Plan [online]. Available: http://www.igc.org/epic/pages/headwaters.html. (July 12, 1999).
13. Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Freudenburg, W. R., Wilson, L. J. & O'Leary, D. J. (1998). Forty years of spotted owls? A longitudinal analysis of logging industry job losses. Sociological Perspectives 41(1), 1–26.
14. Gericke, K.L. & Sullivan, J. (1994). Public participation and appeals of Forest Service Plans-An empirical examination. Society and Natural Resources, 7(2), 125–135.
15. Gundry, K.G. & Heberlein, T.A. (1984). Do public meetings represent the public Journal of the American Planning Association, 50, 175–182.
16. Hoberg, G. (1992). Pluralism by Design: Environmental Policy and the American Regulatory State. New York: Praeger.
17. Humphrey, C. R., Berardi, G., Carroll, M. S., Fairfax, S., Fortmann, L., Geisler, C, Johnson, T. G., Kusel, J., Lee, R. G., Macinko, S., Peluso, N. L., Schulman, M. D. & West, P. C. (1993). Theories in the study of natural resource-dependent communities and persistent rural poverty in the United States. Persistent Poverty in Rural America, 136–172. Boulder, CO: Westview.
18. Ingram, H. & Smith, S. R. (eds.). (1993). Public Policy for Democracy. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
19. Irwin, L. L. & Wigley, T. B. (1992). Conservation of endangered species: The impact on private forestry. Journal of Forestry 90(8), 27–30, 42.
20. IWW Timber Workers Industrial Union #120. (1999). Nine compelling reasons to jail Charles Hurwitz. [online]]. Available: http://www.iww.org/iul20/local/Maxxam-Top-Ten.html. (May 21, 1999).
21. Kohli, A. (1994). “Centralization and powerlessness: India's democracy in a comparative perspective,” In Migdal, J. S., Kohli, A. & Shue, V. (eds.), State power and social forces: Domination and transformation in the Third World, 89–107. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Lammers, P. A. (1995). A summary and meta-analysis of Humboldt County's existing needs assessments. Eureka, CA: St. Joseph Health System.
23. Laumann, E. O. & Knoke, D. (1989). The organizational state: Social change in national policy domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
24. Lee, R. G. (1993). Effect of federal timber sales reduction on workers, families, communities, and social services. Seattle: University of Washington Unpublished paper. Quoted in Freudenburg et al (1998).
25. Light, P. C. (1995). Thickening government: Federal hierarchy and the diffusion of accountability, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
26. Luton, L. S. (1996). The politics of garbage: A community perspective on solid waste policy making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Mazmanian, D. & Morell, D. (1992). Beyond superfailure: America's toxics policy for the 1990s. Boulder: Westview Press.
27. McKillop, W. (1992). Use of contingent valuation in northern spotted owl studies: A critique. Journal of Forestry 90(8), 36–37.
28. Migdal, J. S., Kohli, A. & Shue, V. (eds.). (1994). State power and social forces: Domination and transformation in the Third World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Poffenberger, M. & McGean, B. (Eds.). (1996). Village voices, forest choices. Joint forest management in India, Delhi: Oxford University Press.
30. Salamon, S., Farnsworth, R. L. & Rendziak, J. A. (1998). Is locally led conservation planning working? A farm town case study. Rural Sociology 63(2), 214–234.
31. Sampson, N. (1994, MyJn). It's time to reform ESA. American Forests 100, 656.
32. Schaniberg, A. & Gould, K. A. (1994). Environment and Society: The Enduring Conflict. New York: St. Martin's.
33. Skocpol T. (1985). “Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research,” In Evans, P. B., Rueschmeyer, D. & Skocpol, T. (eds.), Bringing the state back in, 3–37. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Taylor, M. (1982). Community, anarchy and liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Terril, K. (1999, Feb. 26). CDF and PALCO reach agreement on provisional Timber Operator's License for 1999. [online] Available: http://www.fire.ca.gov/february261999.html. (March 26, 1999).
36. Young, O. R. (1981). Natural resources and the state: The political economy of resource management. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.