Strategy selection and hypnotic performance

Contemporary Hypnosis

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 37-47

  Gorassini, Donald R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013359850     PISSN: 09605290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ch.81     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barber, T.X. (1969). Hypnosis: A Scientific Approach. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.
2. Coe, W.C. & Sarbin, T.R. (1991). Role theory: Hypnosis from a dramaturgical and narrational perspective. In S.J. Lynn & J.W. Rhue (Eds). Theories of Hypnosis: Current Models and Perspectives. New York: Guilford.
3. Gorassini, D.R. (1988-1989). The relationship between planned and actual responses to hypnotic suggestions. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 8, 283-294.
4. Gorassini, D. R. (forthcoming). Hypnotic responsiveness: A cognitive-behavioral analysis of self-deception. In A. Capafons, S. Amigo, I. Kirsch & E. Cardena. (Eds). Clinical Hypnosis and Self-Regulation Therapy: A Cognitive-Behavioral Perspective. Washington: American Psychological Association.
5. Gorassini, D.R., Sowerby, D., Creighton, A. & Fry, G. (1991). Hypnotic suggestibility enhancement through brief cognitive skill training. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, 289-297.
6. Hilgard, E.R. (1986). Divided Consciousness: Multiple Controls in Human Thought and Action. New York: Wiley.
7. Katsanis, J., Barnard, J. & Spanos, N.P. (1988-1989). Self-predictions, interpretive set and imagery vividness as determinants of hypnotic responding. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 8, 63-77.
8. Kirsch, I. (1990). Changing Expectations: A Key to Effective Psychotherapy. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
9. Lynn, S.J. & Sivec, H. (1992). The hypnotizable subject as a creative problem-solving agent. In E. From & M. R. Nash (Eds). Contemporary Hypnosis Research. New York: Guilford.
10. Lynn, S.J., Snodgrass, M., Rhue, J.W. & Hardaway, R. (1987). Goal-directed fantasy, hypnotic susceptibility, and expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53, 933-938.
11. Lynn, S.J., Rhue, J.W. & Weekes, J.R. (1990). Hypnotic involuntariness: A social cognitive analysis. Psychological Review 97, 169-184.
12. Sarbin, T.R. & Coe, W.C. (1972). Hypnosis: A Social Psychological Analysis of Influence Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
13. Silva, C.E. & Kirsch, I. (1992). Interpretive sets, expectancy, fantasy proneness, and dissociation as predictors of hypnotic response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 847-856.
14. Snyder, M. (1987). Public Appearances/Private Realities: The Psychology of Self-Monitoring. New York: Freeman.
15. Spanos, N.P. & Gorassini, D.R. (1984). Structure of hypnotic test suggestions and attributions of responding involuntarily. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, 688-696.
16. Spanos, N.P., Radtke, H.L., Hodgins, D.C., Stam, H.J. & Bertrand, L.D. (1983). The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties. Psychological Reports 53, 523-535.
17. Spanos, N.P., Burnley, C.E. & Cross, P.A. (1993). Response expectancies and interpretations as determinants of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65, 1237-1242.
18. Tellegen, A. & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ('absorption'), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 83, 268-277.
19. Wilson, S.C. & Barber, T.X. (1983). The fantasy-prone personality: Implications for understanding imagery, hypnosis, and parapsychological Phenomena. In A.A. Sheikh (Ed). Imagery: Current Theory, Research, and Application. pp. 340-387. New York: Wiley.
20. Weitzenhoffer, A.M. (1974). When is an 'instruction' an 'instruction?' International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 22, 258-269.