Relative Time and Delay of Reinforcement

Learning and Motivation

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 236-248

  Williams, Ben A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013235678     PISSN: 00239690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/lmot.1997.0999     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Balsam P. Relative time in trace conditioning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 423:1984;211-227.
2. Biederman G. Simultaneous discrimination: Parameters of reinforcement and ITI. Psychonomic Science. 8:1967;215-216.
3. Cox J. K., D'Amato M. R. Disruption of overlearned discriminative behavior in monkeys (Cebus appella. Animal Learning & Behavior. 5:1977;93-98.
4. Dews P. B. The theory of fixed-interval responding. The theory of reinforcement schedules. 1970;Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
5. Dickinson A., Watt A., Griffiths W. J. H. Free-operant acquisition with delayed reinforcement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 45B:1992;241-258.
6. Gibbon J., Baldock M. D., Locurto C., Gold L., Terrace H. S. Trial and intertrial durations in autoshaping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 3:1977;264-284.
7. Gibbon J., Balsam P. Spreading association in time. Locurto C. M., Terrace H. S., Gibbon J. Autoshaping and conditioning theory. 1981;219-253 Academic Press, New York.
8. Holland P. C. The effects of intertrial and feature-target intervals on operant serial feature-positive discrimination learning. Animal Learning & Behavior. 23:1995;411-428.
9. Holt G. L., Shafer J. N. Function of intertrial interval in matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 19:1973;181-186.
10. Kaplan P. S. The importance of relative temporal parameters in trace autoshaping: From excitation to inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 10:1984;113-126.
11. Killeen P. Mathematical principles of reinforcement based on the correlation of behavior with incentives in short-term memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 17:1994;105-172.
12. Killeen P., Fetterman G. A behavioral theory of timing. Psychological Review. 95:1988;274-295.
13. Lattal K. A., Gleeson S. Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 16:1990;27-39.
14. Mowrer O. H. Learning theory and behavior. 1960;John Wiley & Sons, New York.
15. Roberts W. A., Kraemer P. J. Some observations of the effect of intertrial interval and delay on delayed matching to sample in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 8:1982;342.
16. Williams B. A. The effects of unsignalled delayed reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 26:1976;441-449.
17. Williams B. A. Contrast effects in simultaneous discrimination learning. Animal Learning & Behavior. 5:1977;47-50.
18. Williams B. A. Blocking the response-reinforcer association. Commons M., Herrnstein R., Wagner A. Quantitative Analyses of Behavior: Volume 3. Acquisition. 1982;427-445 Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge.
19. Williams B. A., Preston R. A., DeKervor D. Blocking of the response-reinforcer association: Additional evidence. Learning and Motivation. 21:1990;379-398.
20. Wixted J. T. Nonhuman short-term memory: a quantitative reanalysis of selected findings. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 52:1989;409-426.