A framework for the analysis of dynamic processes based on Bayesian networks and case-based reasoning

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 15, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 287-294

  Barrientos, M A ^a   Vargas, J E ^a  

^a University of South Carolina ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian networks; Case based reasoning; Ozone levels

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013225980     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0957-4174(98)00036-0     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Biswas P., Li I. F., & Islam S. (1994). Estimation of the dominant degrees of freedom for air pollutant concentration data: applications to ozone measurements. Atmospheric Environment, 28 (9), 1707-1714.
2. Breese J. S., & Heckerman D. (1996). Decision-theoretic case-based reasoning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics -Part A: Systems and Humans, 26 (6), 838-842.
3. Burrows W. R., Benjamin M., Beauchamp S., & Thompson B. (1994). CART decision-tree statistical analysis and prediction of summer season maximum surface ozone for the Vancouver, Montreal and Atlantic regions of Canada. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 34, 1848-1862.
4. Cooper G. (1990). The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian belief networks. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 393-405.
5. Cooper G., & Herskovitz E. (1992). A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Machine Learning, 9, 309-347.
6. Dagum P., Galper A., Horvitz E., & Seiver A. (1995). Uncertain reasoning and forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 11, 73-87.
7. Haddawy, P., Ngo, L., & Helwig, J. (1995). A theoretical framework for context-sensitive temporal probability model construction with application to plan projection. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 419-426). Montreal, Quebec: Morgan Kaufmann.
8. Hanks, S., Madigan, D., & Gavrin, J. (1995). Probabilistic temporal reasoning with endogenous change. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 245-254). Montreal, Quebec: Morgan Kaufmann.
9. Jensen, A. L., & Jensen, F. V. (1996). MIDAS - An influence diagram for management of mildew in winter wheat. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Uncertainty in AI (pp. 349-356). San Francisco, California: Morgan Kaufmann.
10. Kanazawa, K., Koller, D., & Russell, S. (1995). Stochastic simulation algorithms for dynamic probabilistic networks. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 346-351), Montreal, Quebec: Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Kenley, C. R. (1986). Influence diagrams models with continuous variables. Technical report, Sunnyvale, CA.
12. Kjaerulff, U. (1994). A computational scheme for reasoning in dynamic probabilistic networks. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 121-129), Seattle, WA: Morgan Kaufmann.
13. Lam W., & Bacchus F. (1994). Learning Bayesian belief networks: An approach based on the MDL principle. Computational Intelligence, 10 (3), 269-293.
14. Lauritzen S. L., & Spiegelhalter D. J. (1988). Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their applications to expert systems (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 50 (2), 157-224.
15. Liu L. J. S., & Rossini A. J. (1996). Use of Kriging models to predict 12-hour mean ozone concentrations in metropolitan Toronto - a pilot study. Environmental International, 22, 677-692.
16. Neapolitan, R. E. (1989). Probabilistic reasoning in expert systems. New York: Wiley.
17. Nicholson A. E., & Brady J. M. (1994). Dynamic belief networks for discrete monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 24 (11), 1593-1609.
18. Olesen, K. G., Lauritzen, S. L., & Jensen, F. V. (1992). aHUGIN: A system creating adaptive causal probabilistic Networks. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 223-229). San Jose, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
19. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
20. Provan G. M., & Clarke J. R. (1993). Dynamic network construction and updating techniques for the diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15 (3), 299-307.
21. Raga G. B., & Le Moyne L. (1996). On the nature of air pollution dynamics in Mexico City - I. Nonlinear Analysis. Atmospheric Environment, 30 (23), 3987-3993.
22. Reinsel, G. C. (1993). Elements of Multivariate Time Series Analysis. New York: Springer.
23. Simpson R. W. (1983). Forecasting peak ozone levels. Atmospheric Environment, 17 (9), 1649-1654.
24. Sucar, L. E., & Perez-Brito, J. (1995). Induction of dependency structures from data and its application to ozone prediction. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 367-373). Montreal, Quebec: Morgan Kaufmann.
25. Yi J., & Prybutok V. R. (1996). A neural network model forecasting for prediction of daily maximum ozone concentration in an industrialised urban area. Environmental Pollution, 92 (3), 349-357.