Evaluation in the government marketplace

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 37-48

  House, Ernest R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013221139     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: 15570878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109821409701800104     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Becker, G.S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Becker, G.S. (1993). Human capital. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Boston, J. (1994). Purchasing policy advice: The limits to contracting out. Governance, 7(1), 1-30.
4. Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J., Wash, P. (1996). Public management: The New Zealand Model. Auckland, NZ: Oxford University Press.
5. Chelimsky, E. (1992). Rebuilding capacity. In C. Wye and R. Sonnichsen (Eds.). Evaluation in the federal government: Changes, trends, and opportunities. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 55, San Francisco: Jossey Bass. 91-96.
6. Cuttance, P. (1995). Education evaluation: Integrating best practice and performance indicators to benchmark the performance of a school system. Evaluation News and Comment. 4(1), 42-52.
7. Department of Finance. (1994). Doing evaluations: A practical guide. Canberra, Aus: Department of Finance.
8. Elvins, R. (1995). Evaluation-Victoria: An update. Evaluation News and Comment. 4(1), 26-27.
9. Elvins, R. (N. D.). Comparison of evaluation guidelines. Melbourne, Victoria: Department of Treasury.
10. Funnell, S. (1994). Developing a framework for contracting out. IRR Conference on Program Evaluation, April 21-22.
11. Funnell, S. (1995). Establishing a framework to meet the latest competitive policies. Paper presented to the AIC Conference, March 31.
12. Gore, A. (1993). Creating a government that works better and costs less. The Report of the National Performance Review New York: Plume.
13. Henkel, M. (1991). Government, evaluation and change. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
14. Highett, N. (1995). Update of program evaluation: Initiatives in practice: State perspectives. Evaluation News and Comment. 4(1), 23-24.
15. Hounslow, B. The evaluation ethos: A community sector perspective. AIC Conferences.
16. House, E.R. (1993). Professional evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
17. House, E.R. & Care, N.S. (1979). Fair evaluation agreement. Educational Theory. 29(3), 159-169. Reprinted in E.R. House (1980), Evaluating with Validity, Sage Publications.
18. House, E.R., Haug, C., and Norris, N. (1996). Producing evaluations in large bureaucracies. Evaluation. 2(2), 135-150.
19. House, E.R. (1995). Putting things together coherently: Logic and justice. In D. M. Fournier (Ed.). Reasoning in evaluation: Inferential links and leaps. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 68, 33-48.
20. Ife, J. (1995). Paradigms lost: The disjunction between analysis and practice. National Conference, Australian Association of Social Workers, Launceston.
21. Johnston, C. (1995). A public interest perspective on National Competition Policy. Paper presented to IIR Conference, Sydney, Feb 13-14.
22. Kettl, D.F. (1993). Sharing power: Public governance and private markets. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution.
23. Kettl, D.F. (1994). Reinventing government? Appraising the National Performance Review Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution.
24. Kettl, D.F. and Dilulio, Jr., J.J. (1995). Inside the reinvention machine: Appraising government reform. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution.
25. Love, A. (1995a). My impressions of OZ and NZ and evaluation there. Evaluation News and Comment. 4(1), 3-8.
26. Love. A. (1995b). Internal evaluation: Building organizations from within. Evaluation News and Comment. 4(1), 10-13.
27. Norris, N. (1993). The contractual control of policy and programme evaluation. Norwich, UK: Centre for Applied Research in Education, University of East Anglia.
28. O'Laughlin, M. & Mackaway, J. (1995). Developments in program evaluation n the Western Australian public sector. Evaluation News and Comment. 4(1), 24-26.
29. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30. Perkin, H. (1989). The rise of professional society: England since 1880. London: Routledge.
31. Pettigrew, M. (1993). Coming to terms with research: the contract business. Norwich, UK: Centre for Applied Research in Education, University of East Anglia.
32. Rogers, P., Hawthorne, G., & Wheller, R. (1995). Primary school drug education: An evaluation of life education in Victoria. Evaluation News and Comment. 4(1), 29-36.
33. Rose, K.P. (1995). Initiatives in practice: The Queensland perspective. Evaluation News and Comment. 4(1), 14-17.
34. Scriven, M. (1995a). Evaluation consulting. Evaluation Practice. 16(1), 47-57.
35. Scriven, M. (1995b). What should a nonprofit pay an evaluation consultant? Pt. Reyes, CA: Evaluation and Development Group.
36. Sharp, C.A. (1995). Update of program evaluation: South Australia. Evaluation News and Comment, 4(1), 18-22.
37. Starr, P. (1982). The social transformation of American medicine. New York: Basic Books.
38. Wargo, M.J. (1994). The impact of the President's reinvention plan on Congress. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 63-72.
39. Williams, B. (1994). Zen and the art of contract maintenance. Public Sector, 17, 1.
40. Williamson, O.E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
41. Wilson, J.O. (1989). Bureaucracy New York: Basic Books.