Methodological issues in MIS cross-cultural research

Journal of Global Information Management

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 48-55

  Karahanna, Elena ^a   Evaristo, Roberto ^b   Srite, Mark ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RESEARCH;

CROSS-CULTURAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0013207726     PISSN: 10627375     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jgim.2002010105     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Angoff, W. H. (1982). Use of Difficulty and Discrimination Indices for Detecting Item Bias. Handbook of Methods for Detecting Item Bias. R. A. Beck. Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press.: 96-116.
2. Berk, R. A., Ed. (1982). Handbook of Methods for Detecting Item Bias. Baltimore, MD, John Hopkins University Press.
3. Brislin, L. and Thorndike (1973). Cross-Cultural Research Methods.
4. Brislin, R. (1986). The Wording and Translation of Research Instruments. Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Lonner and Berry.
5. Campbell, D. T. and D. W. Fiske (1959). "Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix." Psychological Bulletin 56, 81-105.
6. Clauser, B. E., K. M. Mazor, and R.K. Hambleton (1994). "The Effect of Score Group Width on the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure." Journal of Educational Measurement 31, 67-78.
7. Cleary, T. A. and T. L. Hilton (1968). "An Investigation of Item Bias." Educational and Psychological Measurement 28, 61-75.
8. Cook, T. and D. Campbell (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
9. Devine, P. J. and N. S. Raju (1982). "Extent of Overlap Among Four Item Bias Methods." Educational and Psychological Measurement 42, 1049-1066.
10. Dorans, N. J. and E. Kulick (1986). "Demonstrating the Utility of the Standardization Approach to Assessing Unexpected Differential Item Performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test." Journal of Educational Measurement 23, 355-368.
11. Dorans, N. J. and P. W. Holland (1993). DIF Detection and Description: Mantel-Haenszel and Standardization. Differential Item Functioning. P. W. H. a. H. Wainer. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 35-66.
12. Englehard, G., L. Hansche, and K.E. Rutledge (1990). "Accuracy of Bias Review Judges in Identifying Differential Item Functioning on Teacher Certification Tests." Applied Measurement in Education 3, 347-360.
13. Evaristo, J. R., E. Karahanna, and M. Srite. (2000). Cross-Cultural Research in MIS: A Review. Global Information Technology Management Conference, Memphis, TN.
14. Hambleton, R. K. (1994). "Guidelines for Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests: A Progress Report." European Journal of Psychological Assessment 10, 229-244.
15. Hampton, G. (1979). "Students as Subjects in International Behavioral Studies." Journal of International Business Studies 10(2): 94-96.
16. Hoecklin, L. (1994). Managing Cultural Differences - Strategies for Competitive Advantage. Workingham, England, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
17. Holland, P. W. and D. T. Thayer (1988). Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure. Test Validity. H. W. a. H. I. Braun. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 129-145.
18. Hoover, H. D. and M. J. Kolen (1984). "The Reliability of Six Item Bias Indices." Applied Psychological Measurement 8, 173-181.
19. Hui, H. and H. Triandis (1985). "Measurement in Cross-Cultural Psychology." Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 16(2):131-152.
20. Ironson, G. H. and M. J. Subkoviak (1979). "A Comparison of Several Methods of Assessing Item Bias." Journal of Educational Measurement 16, 209-225.
21. Irvine, S. and W. Carrol (1980). Testing and Assessment Across Cultures: Issues in Methodology and Theory. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Methodology. H. C. Triandis and W. Lonner. Boston, Allyn and Bacon, 181-244.
22. Khera, S. P. and J. Benson (1970). "Are Students Really Poor Substitutes for Businessmen in Behavioral Research?" Journal of Marketing (November) 529-532.
23. Lee, C. and R. Green (1991). "Cross-cultural Examination of the Fishbein Behavioral Intentions Model." Journal of International Business Studies 22(2), 289-305.
24. Lipson, J. G. and A. I. Meleis (1989). "Methodological Issues in Research with Immigrants." Medical Anthropology 12, 103-115.
25. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Lord, F. M. and M. R. Novick (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
27. Mullen, M. (1995). "Diagnosing Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research." Journal of International Business Studies (Third Quarter), 573-596.
28. Plake, B. S. (1980). "A Comparison of a Statistical and Subjective Procedure to Ascertain Item Validity: One Step in the Test Validation Process." Educational and Psychological Measurement 40: 397-404.
29. Poortinga, Y. H. (1971). "Cross-Cultural Comparisons of maximum Performance Tests: Some Methodological Aspects and Some Experiments with Simple Auditory and Visual Stimuli." Psychologia Africana Monograph Supplement 6.
30. Poortinga, Y. H. (1975). Some Implications of three Different Approaches to Inter-cultural Comparison. Applied Cross-Cultural Psychology. J. W. B. a. W. J. Lonner. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Swets and Zeitlinger, 329-332.
31. Poortinga, Y. H. (1989). "Equivalence in Cross Cultural Data: An Overview of Basic Issues." International Journal of Psychology 24(6), 737-756.
32. Poortinga, Y. H. (1989). "Equivalence in Cross-Cultural Data: An Overview of Basic Issues." International Journal of Psychology 24, 737-756.
33. Poortinga, Y. H. and F. van de Vijver (1987). "Explaining Cross-Cultural Differences: Bias Analysis and Beyond." Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 18(3), 259-282.
34. Reise, S. P., K. F. Widaman, and R.H. Pugh (1993). "Confirmatory Factor analysis and Item Response Theory: Two approaches for Exploring Measurement Invariance." Psychological Bulletin 114, 552-566.
35. Ross, C. E. and J. Mirowsky (1984). "Socially-Desirable response and Acquiescence in Cross-Cultural Survey of Mental Health." Journal of Health and Social Behavior 25: 189-197.
36. Rudner, L. M., P. R. Getson, and D.L. Knight (1980). "A Monte Carlo Comparison of Seven Biased Item Detection Techniques." Journal of Educational Measurement 17, 1-10.
37. Serpell, R. (1993). The Significance of Schooling: Life Journeys in an African Society. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
38. Shepard, L., G. Camilli, and M. Averill (1981). "Comparison of six Procedures for Detecting Test Item Bias Using Both Internal and External Ability Criteria." Journal of Educational Statistics 6, 317-375.
39. Shuptine, K. (1975). "On the Validity of Using Students as Subjects in Consumer Behavior Expectation." Journal of Business (July): 383-390.
40. Skaggs, G. and R. W. Lissitz (1992). "The Consistency of Detecting Item Bias Across Different Test Administrations: Implications of Another Failure." Journal of Educational Measurement 29, 227-242.
41. Thiesen, D., L. Steinberg, and H. Wainer (1993). Detection of Differential Item Functioning Using the Parameters of Item Response Models. Differential Item Functioning. P. W. H. a. H. Wainer. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 67-113.
42. Triandis, H. (1976). "Methodological Problems of Comparative Research." International Journal of Psychology 11(3), 155-159.
43. van de Vijver, F. and R. K. Hambleton (1996). "Translating Tests: Some Practical Guidelines." European Psychologist 1, 89-99.
44. van de Vijver, F. and K. Leung (1997). Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications.
45. van de Vijver, F. and Y. H. Poortinga (1997). "Towards an Integrated Analysis of Bias in Cross-Cultural Assessment." European Journal of Psychological Assessment 13, 21-29.