Modeling and Simulating Work Practice: A Method for Work Systems Design

IEEE Intelligent Systems

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 32-41

  Sierhuis, Maarten ^a   Clancey, William J ^a  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; REENGINEERING; RELATIONAL DATABASE SYSTEMS; SCHEDULING;

BUSINESS PROCESS FLOW ANALYSIS; BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING; HUMAN-CENTERED WORK SYSTEM METHOD; WORK PRACTICE ANALYSIS;

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 0013205401     PISSN: 15411672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2002.1039830     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. C.H. Pava, Managing New Office Technology: An Organizational Strategy, Free Press, New York, 1984.
2. R.J. Mayer et al., “Framework and a Suite of Methods for Business Process Reengineering,” Business Process Change: Reengineering Concepts, Methods and Technologies, V. Grover and W.J. Kettinger, eds., Idea Group, Hershey, Pa., 1998.
3. P. Ehn, Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts, Arbetslivcentrum, Stockholm, 1988.
4. J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng, eds., Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., 1991.
5. W.J. Clancey, “Simulating Activities: Relating Motives, Deliberation, and Attentive Coordination,” to be published in Cognitive Systems Rev., 2002.
6. W.J. Clancey et al., “Brahms: Simulating Practice for Work Systems Design,” Int'l J. Human-Computer Studies, vol. 49, 1998, pp. 831-865.
7. M. Sierhuis, Modeling and Simulating Work Practice. Brahms: A Multiagent Modeling and Simulation Language for Work System Analysis and Design, SIKS Dissertation Series no. 2001-2010, Dept. of Social Science Informatics, Univ. of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 2001.
8. E. Yourdon, Modern Structured Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 1989.
9. K. Holtzblatt and H. Beyer, Contextual Design: A Customer-Centered Approach to Systems Design, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1998.
10. J. Blomberg et al., “Ethnographic Field Methods and Their Relation to Design,” ParticipatoryDesign: Principles and Practices, A.N.D. Schuller, ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., 1993, pp. 1, 26, 123-155.
11. N.A. Cabrol et al., “Science Results of the Atacama Nomad Rover Field Experiment, Chile: Implications for Planetary Explo ration,” J. Geophysical Research, vol. 106, no. E4, 2001, pp. 7664-7675.
12. S.D. Wall and K.W. Ledbetter, Design of Mission Operations Systems for Scientific Remote Sensing, Taylor & Francis, London, 1991.