Assemblages of mountainous day-active Lepidoptera in the Hruby Jesenik Mts, Czech Republic

Biologia

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 159-167

  Beneš, Jiří ^a   Kuras, Tomes ^a   Konvlčka, Martin ^b  

^a PALACKÝ UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Alpine butterflies; Czech republic; Day active moths; Diversity; Migrant and resident species; Sex ratio; Yellow pan water traps

Indexed keywords

EREBIA EURYALE; LEPIDOPTERA; NYMPHALIDAE; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 0013149816     PISSN: 00063088     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BARTâK, M. 1997. The biomonitoring of Diptera by means of yellow pan water traps. Folia Fac. Sci. Natur. Univ. Masaryk. Brun., Biol. 95: 9-16.
2. BEDNAft, V. & PèNCIKOVâ, M. 1985. Spoleeenstva prirozenych smrCin v povodi Merty v Hrubérn Jeseniku. Acta Univ. Palack. Olomouc, Biol. 25: 47-64.
3. BOGGS, C. L. & MURPHY, D. D. 1997. Community composition in montane ecosystems: climatic determinants of montane butterfly distributions. Global Ecology and Conservation Letters 6: 39-48.
4. BRUSSARD, P. F. & EHRLICH, P. R. 1970a. The population structure of Erebia epipsodea (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Ecology 51: 119-129.
5. BRUSSARD, P. F. & EHRLICH, P. R. 1970b. Adult behaviour and population structure in Erebia epipsodea (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Ecology 51: 880-885.
6. DENNIS, R. L. H. (ed.) 1992. The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 354 pp.
7. ERHARDT, A. 1985. Day-active Lepidoptera: A sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. J. appl. Ecol. 22: 841-861.
8. ERHARDT, A. 1995. Ecology and conservation of alpine Lepidoptera, pp. 258-276. In: PULLIN, A. S. (ed.)
9. Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies, Chapman &L Hall, London.
10. FAJCÍK, J. & SLAMKA, F. 1996. Motyle strednej Európy, I. zväzok. Frantiäek Slarnka, Bratislava, 113 + XX pp.
11. FLEISHMAN, E., AUSTIN, G. T. & WEISS, A. D. 1998. An empirical test of Rapoport's rule: elevational gradient in montane butterfly communities. Ecology 79: 2482-2493.
12. FRANK, T. 1998. Attractiveness of sown weed strips on hoverflies (Syrphidae, Diptera), butterflies (Rhopalocera, Lepidoptera), wild bees (Apoidea, Hymenoptera) and thread-waisted wasps (Sphecidae, Hymenoptera). Mitt. Schweiz. Ent. Gesell. 71: 11-20.
13. GALL, L. F. 1984. Population structure and recommendation for conservation of the narrowly endemic alpine butterfly, Boloria acrocnema (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol. Conserv. 28: 111138.
14. GEIGER, W. fc SCHOLL, E. 1981. Wiederfangversuche an markierten Alpengelblingen (Colias phicomone Esp., Lep. Pieridae). Mitt. Naturforsch. Gesell. Bern 28: 145-156.
15. GUTIéRREZ, D. & MENéNDEZ, R. 1998. Phenology of butterflies along an altitudinal gradient in northern Spain. J. Zool., Lond. 244: 249-264.
16. JENîK, J. 1961. Alpinskâ vegetace Krkonos, Krâlického Snëzniku a Hrubého Jeseniku: Teorie anemoorografickych systémû. Nakl. CSAV, Praha, 412 pp.
17. JENîK, J., BURES, L. & BURESOVâ, Z. 1980. Syntaxonomic study of vegetation in Velkâ Kotlina cirque, the Sudeten Mountains. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 15: 1-28.
18. KLIMES, L. & KLIMESOVâ, J. 1991. Alpine tundra in the Hruby Jesenik Mts., the Sudeten, and its tentative development in the 20th century. Preslia, Praha 63: 245-268.
19. KREBS, C. J. 1998. Ecological methodology, 2nd Edition. Harper-Collins, New York, 576 pp.
20. KURAS, T., BENES, J., & KONVICKA, M. 2000. Differing habitat affinities of four Erebia species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) in the Hruby Jesenik Mts, Czech Republic. Biologia, Bratislava, 55: 169-175.
21. LASTùVKA, Z. (ed.) 1998. Checklist of Lepidoptera of the Czech and Slovak Republics (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Konvoj, Brno, 118 pp.
22. MANI, N. S. 1962. Introduction to high altitude entomology. Methuen & Co., London, 302 pp.
23. McCoY, E. D. 1990. The distribution of insects along elevational gradients. Oikos 58: 313-322.
24. MOERICKE, V. 1951. Eine Farbfalle zur Kontrolle des Fluges von Blattläusen. Nachr-Bl. Dtsch. Pfl.Schutzdienst., Stuttgart 3: 23-24.
25. MURPHY, D. D., MENNINGER, M. S. & EHRLICH, P. R. 1984. Nectar source distribution as a determinant of oviposition host species in Euphydryas chalcedona. Oecologia 62: 269-271.
26. PEET, R. K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4: 53-74.
27. PlELOU, E. C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 13: 131-144.
28. PULLIN, A. S. (ed.) 1995. Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman &c Hall, London, 364 pp.
29. ROFF, D. A. 1986. The evolution of wing dimorphism in insects. Evolution 40: 1009-1020.
30. ROHäCEK, J., BARTâK, M. fe KUBîK, S. 1998. Diptera Acalyptrata of the Hranicnï (Luzenskâ) slat' peatbog in the Sumava Mts. (Czech Republic). Cas. Siez. Mus., Ser. A 47: 1-12.
31. SHREEVE, T. G. 1995. Butterfly mobility, pp. 37-45. In: PULLIN, A. S. (ed.) Ecology and conservation of butterflies, Chapman & Hall, London.
32. SKOU, P. 1991. Nordens Ugler. Danmarks dyreliv, Bind 5. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 566 pp.
33. SOUKUPOVâ, L., KOCIâNOVâ, M., JENI'K, J. fc SEKYRA, J. (eds) 1995. Arctic-Alpine tundra in the Krkonoge, the Sudetes. Opera corcont. 32: 5-88.
34. STRATHDEE, A. T. fc BALE, J. S. 1998. Life on the edge: Insect ecology in arctic environments. A. Rev. Ent. 43: 85-106.
35. WATT, W. B., CHEW, F. S., SNYDER, L. R. G., WATT, A. G. & ROTHSCHILD, D. E. 1977. Population structure of pierid butterflies. I. Numbers and movements of some montane Colias species. Oecologia 27: 1-22.
36. WILCOX, B. A., MURPHY, D. D., EHRLICH, P. R. & AUSTIN, G. T. 1986. Insular biogeography of the mountain butterfly faunas in the Great Basin: comparison with birds and mammals. Oecologia 69: 188-194.
37. WOLDA, H, 1981. Similarity indices, sample size and diversity. Oecologia 50: 296-302.