A practical trojan horse for bell-inequality-based quantum cryptography

Quantum Information and Computation

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 434-442

  Larsson, Jan Åke ^a,b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Ekert protocol, bell inequality; Quantum cryptography; Trojan horse

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); MANUFACTURE; POLARIZATION; QUANTUM COMMUNICATION; QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY; QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

BB84 PROTOCOL; BELL'S INEQUALITY; DISTRIBUTION DEVICES; EKERT PROTOCOL, BELL INEQUALITY; PHOTON'S POLARIZATION; QUANTUM CHANNEL; SECRET KEY; SINGLE PHOTONS; UNCONDITIONAL SECURITY; UNCONDITIONALLY SECURE;

PHOTONS;

EID: 0013146218     PISSN: 15337146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.26421/qic2.6-2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Nicolas Gisin, Grégorie Ribordy, Wolfgang Tittel, and Hugo Zbinden (2002), Quantum cryptography, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74:145-195.
2. Grégoire Ribordy, Jürgen Brendel, Jean-Daniel Gautier, Nicolas Gisin, and Hugo Zbinden (2001), Long-distance entanglement-based quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. A 63:012309-1-12.
3. W. T. Buttler, R. J. Hughes, S. K. Lamoreaux, G. L. Morgan, J. E. Nordholt, and C. G. Peterson (2000), Daylight quantum key distribution over 1.6 km, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:5652-5655.
4. D. Mayers (1996), Quantum key distribution and string oblivious transfer in noisy channels, in Advances in cryptology - Proceedings of Crypto '96, Springer, pp. 343-357.
5. Peter W. Shor and John Preskill (2000), Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85:441-444.
6. D. S. Naik, C. G. Peterson, A. G. White, A. J. Berglund, and P. G. Kwiat (2000), Entangled state quantum cryptography: Eavesdropping on the Ekert protocol, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:4733-4736.
7. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard (1984), Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, in Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India, IEEE (New York), pp. 175-179.
8. John F. Clauser (1974), Experimental distinction between the quantum and classical fieldtheoretic predictions for the photoelectric effect, Phys. Rev. D 9:853-860.
9. W. K. Wooters and W. H. Zurek (1984), A single quantum cannot be cloned, Nature 299:802-803.
10. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, and J.-M. Robert (1986), How to reduce your enemy's information, in Advances in Cryptology - Proceedings of Crypto '85 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 218), Springer (Berlin), pp. 468-476.
11. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, and U. M. Maurer (1995), Generalized privacy amplification, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 41:1915-1923
12. C. H. Bennett, F. Bessette, G. Brassard, L. Salvail, and J. Smolin (1992), Experimental quantum cryptography, J. Crypto. 5:3-28.
13. Gilles Brassard, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Tal Mor, and Barry C. Sanders (2000), Limitations on practical quantum cryptography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85:1330-1333.
14. Artur K. Ekert (1991), Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67:661-663.
15. J. S. Bell (1964), On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Physics 1:195-200.
16. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen (1935), Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev. 47:777-780.
17. David Bohm (1951) Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall (New York).
18. John F. Clauser, Michael A. Home, Abner Shimony, and Richard A. Holt (1969), Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23:880-884.
19. M. A. Rowe, D. Kielpinski, V. Meyer, C. A. Scakett, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland (2001), Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection, Nature 409:791-794.
20. Jan-Åke Larsson (1998), The Bell inequality and detector inefficiency, Phys. Rev. A 57:3304-3308.
21. Jan-Åke Larsson (1999), Modeling the singlet state with local variables, Phys. Lett. A 256:245-252.
22. P. G. Kwiat, K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, A. V. Sergienko, and Y. Shih (1995), New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75:4337-4341.
23. K. Hess and W. Phillip (2001), A possible loophole in the theorem of Bell, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 98:14224-14227.
24. K. Hess and W. Phillip (2001), Bell's theorem and the problem of decidability between the views of Einstein and Bohr, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 98:14228-14233.
25. K. Hess and W. Phillip (2002), Exclusion of time in the theorem of Bell, Europhys. Lett. 57:775-781.
26. Gregor Weihs, Thomas Jennewein, Christoph Simon, Harald Weinfurter, and Anton Zeilinger (1998), Violation of Bell's inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81:5039-5043.
27. J. D. Franson (1991), Violations of a simple inequality for classical fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67:290-293.
28. Sven Aerts, Paul Kwiat, Jan-Åke Larsson, and Marek Żukowski (1999), Two-photon Fransontype experiments and local realism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83:2872-2875.
29. Dominic Mayers and Andrew Yao (1998), Quantum cryptography with imperfect apparatus, in Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE Comput. Soc. (Los Alamitos), pp. 503-509.