Bivalent effects of MK-801 on ethanol-induced sensitization do not parallel its effects on ethanol-induced tolerance

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 117, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 641-649

  Meyer, Paul J ^a   Phillips, Tamara J ^a,b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; CALCIUM; DIZOCILPINE; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

ALCOHOL TOLERANCE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ATAXIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; HABITUATION; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; REINFORCEMENT; SENSITIZATION; WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME;

ANIMALS; DIZOCILPINE MALEATE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG INTERACTIONS; DRUG SYNERGISM; DRUG TOLERANCE; ETHANOL; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED DBA; MOTOR ACTIVITY;

EID: 0013069245     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.3.641     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Amalric, M., & Koob, G. F. (1993). Functionally selective neurochemical afferents and efferents of the mesocorticolimbic and nigrostriatal dopamine system. Progress in Brain Research, 99, 209-226.
2. Broadbent, J., & Weitemier, A. Z. (1999). Dizocilpine (MK-801) prevents the development of sensitization to ethanol in DBA/2J mice. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 34, 283-288.
3. Camarini, R., Frussa-Filho, R., Monteiro, M. G., & Calil, M. H. (2000). MK-801 blocks the development of behavioral sensitization to ethanol. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 285-290.
4. Carlezon, W. A., Jr., Kosten, T. A., & Nestler, E. J. (2000). Behavioral interactions caused by combined administration of morphine and MK-801 in rats. Psychopharmacology, 151, 261-272.
5. Carlezon, W. A., Jr., Mendrek, A., & Wise, R. A. (1995). MK-801 disrupts the expression but not the development of bromocriptine sensitization: A state-dependency interpretation. Synapse, 20, 1-9.
6. Crabbe, J. C., Gallaher, E. S., Phillips, T. J., & Belknap, J. K. (1994). Genetic determinants of sensitivity to ethanol in inbred mice. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 1-10.
7. Cunningham, C. L., & Noble, D. (1992). Conditioned activation induced by ethanol: Role in sensitization and conditioned place preference. Pharmacology Biochemistry, and Behavior, 43, 307-313.
8. 2+ concentration by ethanol. Journal of Neurochemistry, 56, 1536-1543.
9. Grant, K. A., Colombo, G., Grant, J., & Rogawski, M. A. (1996). Dizocilpine-like discriminative stimulus effects of low-affinity uncompetitive NMDA antagonists. Neuropharmacology, 35, 1709-1719.
10. Itzhak, Y., & Martin, J. L. (1999). Effects of cocaine, nicotine, dizocilpine and alcohol on mice locomotor activity: Cocaine-alcohol cross-sensitization involves upregulation of striatal dopamine transporter binding sites. Brain Research, 818, 204-211.
11. Jackson, A., Koek, W., & Colpaert, F. C. (1992). NMDA antagonists make learning and recall state-dependent. Behavioural Pharmacology, 3, 415-421.
12. Kuribara, H. (1994). Potentiation of the ambulation-increasing effect induced by combined administration of MK-801 with ethanol in mice. Psychopharmacology, 113, 453-456.
13. Leith, N. J., & Kuczenski, R. (1982). Two dissociable components of behavioral sensitization following repeated amphetamine administration. Psychopharmacology, 76, 310-315.
14. Levens, N., & Akins, C. K. (2001). Cocaine induces conditioned place preference and increases locomotor activity in male Japanese quail. Pharmacology Biochemistry, and Behavior, 68, 71-80.
15. Li, Y., White F. J., & Wolf M. E. (2000). Pharmacological reversal of behavioral and cellular indices of cocaine sensitization in the rat. Psychopharmacology, 151, 175-183.
16. MacKenzie-Taylor, D. R., & Rech, R. H. (1991). Cellular and learned tolerance to pentobarbital ataxia. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 39, 257-264.
17. Morris, R. G. M., Anderson, E., Lynch, G. S., & Baudry, M. (1986, February 27). Selective impairment of learning and blockade of longterm potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5. Nature, 319, 774-776.
18. Newlin, D. B., & Thomson, J. B. (1990). Alcohol challenge with sons of alcoholics: A critical review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 383-402.
19. Overton, D. A. (1984). State dependent learning and drug discrimination. In L. L. Iversen, L. D. Iverson, & S. H. Snyder (Eds.), Handbook of psychopharmacology (pp. 59-112). New York: Plenum Press.
20. Phillips, T. J., Burkhart-Kasch, S., Gwiazdon, C. C., & Crabbe, J. C. (1992). Acute sensitivity of FAST and SLOW mice to the effects of abused drugs on locomotor activity. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 26, 525-533.
21. Phillips, T. J., Dickinson, S., & Burkhart-Kasch, S. (1994). Behavioral sensitization to drug stimulant effects in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred mice. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 789-803.
22. Phillips, T. J., Huson, M., Gwiazdon, C., Burkhart-Kasch, S., & Shen, E. H. (1995). Effects of acute and repeated ethanol exposures on the locomotor activity of BXD recombinant inbred mice. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 19, 269-278.
23. Phillips, T. J., Roberts, A. J., & Lessov, C. N. (1997). Behavioral sensitization to ethanol: Genetics and the effects of stress. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 57, 487-493.
24. Pierce, R. C., & Kalivas, P. W. (1997). A circuitry model of the expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-like psychostimulants. Brain Research Reviews, 25, 192-216.
25. Powell, K. R., & Holtzman, S. G. (2001). Parametric evaluation of the development of sensitization to the effects of morphine on locomotor activity. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 62, 83-90.
26. Ranaldi, R., Munn, E., Neklesa, T., & Wise, R. A. (2000). Morphine and amphetamine sensitization in rats demonstrated under moderate- and high-dose NMDA receptor blockade with MK-801 (dizocilpine). Psychopharmacology, 151, 192-201.
27. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 11, 157-198.
28. Rustay, N. R., Boehm, S. L., II, Schafer, G. L., Browman, K. E., Erwin V. G., & Crabbe, J. C. (2001). Sensitivity and tolerance to ethanolinduced incoordination and hypothermia in HAFR and LAFT mice. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 70, 167-174.
29. Sannerud, C. A., Marley, R. J., Serdikoff, S. L., Alastra, A. J., Cohen, C., & Goldberg, S. R. (1993). Tolerance to the behavioral effects of chlordiazepoxide: Pharmacological and biochemical selectivity. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 267, 1311-1320.
30. Shen, E. H., Dorow, J. H., Huson, M., & Phillips, T. J. (1996). Correlated responses to selection in FAST and SLOW mice: Effects of ethanol on ataxia, temperature, sedation, and withdrawal. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 20, 688-696.
31. Shen, E. H., Harland, R. D., Crabbe, J. C., & Phillips, T. J. (1995). Bidirectional selective breeding for ethanol effects on locomotor activity: Characterization of FAST and SLOW mice through selection generation 35. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 19, 1234-1245.
32. Shen, E. H., & Phillips, T. J. (1998). MK-801 potentiates ethanol's effects on locomotor activity in mice. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 59, 135-143.
33. Sripada, S., Gaytan, O., Swann, A., & Dafny, N. (2001). The role of MK-801 in sensitization to stimulants. Brain Research Reviews, 35, 97-114.
34. Stephens, D. N., Elliman T. D., & Dunworth S. J. (2000). State-dependent behavioural sensitization: Evidence from a chlordiazepoxide state. Behavioural Pharmacology, 11, 161-167.
35. Szabo, G., Tabakoff, B., & Hoffman, P. L. (1994). The NMDA receptor antagonist dizocilpine differentially affects environment-dependent and environment-independent ethanol tolerance. Psychopharmacology, 113, 511-517.
36. Tricklebank, M. D., Singh, L., Oles, R. J., Preston, C., & Iversen S. D. (1989). The behavioural effects of MK-801: a comparison with antagonists acting non-competitively and competitively at the NMDA receptor. European Journal of Pharmacology, 167, 127-135.
37. Tzschentke, T. M., & Schmidt, W. J. (1998). Does the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist dizocilpine (MK801) really block behavioural sensitization associated with repeated drug administration? Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 19, 447-451.
38. Tzschentke, T. M., & Schmidt, W. J. (2000). Blockade of behavioral sensitization by MK-801: Fact or artifact? Psychopharmacology, 151, 142-151.
39. Vanderschuren, L. J., & Kalivas, P. W. (2000). Alterations in dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmission in the induction and expression of behavioral sensitization: A critical review of preclinical studies. Psychopharmacology, 151, 99-120.
40. Vanover K. E. (1999). Interaction of ethanol with excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists in mice. European Journal of Pharmacology, 368, 137-142.
41. Wilson, W. R., Bosy, T. Z., & Ruth, J. A. (1990). NMDA agonists and antagonists alter the hypnotic response to ethanol in LS and SS mice. Alcohol, 7, 389-395.
42. Windh, R. T., Little, P. J., & Kuhn, C. M. (1995). The ontogeny of mu opiate tolerance and dependence in the rat: Antinociceptive and biochemical studies. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 273, 1361-1374.
43. Wise, R. A., & Bozarth, M. A. (1987). A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychological Reviews, 94, 469-492.
44. Wu, P. H., Mihic, S. J., Liu, J. F., Le, A. D., & Kalant, H. (1993). Blockade of chronic tolerance to ethanol by the NMDA antagonist, (+)-MK-801. European Journal of Pharmacology, 231, 157-164.