Curriculum evaluation revisited

Cambridge Journal of Education

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 207-219

  Norris, Nigel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013061838     PISSN: 0305764X     EISSN: 14693577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305764980280206     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adelman, C., and Alexander, R., 1982. The Self-evaluating Institution, London: Methuen.
2. Boruch, R.F., 1997. Experiments for Planning and Evaluation: a practical guide, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3. Brimblecombe, N., Ormston, M., and Shaw, M., 1995. Teachers’ perceptions of school inspection: a stressful experience. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25: 53–62.
4. Campbell, D.T., 1976. Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change, Evaluation Centre Occasional Paper no. 8 Kalamazoo, MI: College of Education, Western Michigan University.
5. Campbell, D.T., and Stanley, J., 1966. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
6. CIPFA. 1997. A guide to performance indicators, 1995/96. Public Finance, 7(Suppl.)
7. Cook, T.D., and Campbell, D.T., 1979. Quasi-experimentation Designs and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8. Cronbach, L.J., 1981. Towards Reform of Program Evaluation, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9. Cronbach, L.J., 1983. Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs, London: Jossey-Bass.
10. Crowson, R., Boyd, W.L., and Mawhinney, H.B., eds. 1996. The Politics of Education and the New Institutionalism, London: Falmer Press.
11. Darling-Hammond, L., Policy uses of indicators. paper prepared as part of an international indicators project developed by the OECD. Teachers College, Columbia University.
12. Dean, J., 1995. What teachers and headteachers think about inspection. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25: 45–52.
13. Elliott, J., 1978. “ Classroom accountability and the self-monitoring teacher ”. In Evaluation and the Teacher's Role, Edited by: Harlen, W., Basingstoke: Macmillan.
14. Fullan, M., 1991. The New Meaning of Educational Change, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
15. Gilroy, P., and Wilcox, B., 1997. OFSTED, criteria and the nature of social understanding: a Wittgensteinian critique of the practice of educational judgement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 45(1): 22–38.
16. Glass, G., 1974. “ Teacher effectiveness ”. In Evaluating Educational Performance, Edited by: Walberg, H., 11–32. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
17. Goodson, I., 1997. The Changing Curriculum, New York, NY: Peter Lang.
18. Haney, W., and Madaus, G., Effects of standardized testing and the future of the national assessment of educational progress. a working paper for the NAEP study group, Centre for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy. Boston College.
19. Henkel, M., 1991. The new evaluative state. Public Administration, 69: 121–136.
20. House, E., 1993. Professional Evaluation, London: Sage.
21. Inner London Education Authority. 1977. Keeping the School Under Review--a method of self assessment devised by the ILEA inspectorate, London: ILEA.
22. Laukkanen, R., 1995. “ The formation of evaluation policies in education in Finland ”. In Evaluating Education in Finland, Edited by: Yrjonsuuri, Y., Helsinki: National Board of Education.
23. Lawton, D., 1984. “ Cultural analysis and curriculum evaluation ”. In Evaluating the Curriculum in the Eighties, Edited by: Skilbeck, M., 15–31. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
24. Lawton, D., 1989. Education Culture and the National Curriculum, London: Hodder & Stoughton.
25. Lawton, S.B., 1992. Why restructure?: an international survey of the roots of reform. Journal of Education Policy, 7: 139–154.
26. MacDonald, B., 1978. “ Accountability, standards and the process of schooling ”. In Accountability in Education, Edited by: Becher, T., and Maclure, S., 127–151. Slough: NFER.
27. MacDonald, B., Educational evaluation in the contemporary world. invited presentation to the Symposium International De Didactica General y Didacticas Especiales. September-2 October27, La Manga del Mar Menor, Spain.
28. Madaus, G.F., 1992. A national testing system: manna from above?, Centre for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College. (mimeo)
29. Mitchell, P., 1984. “ Institutional evaluation: the process within a school ”. In Evaluating the Curriculum in the Eighties, Edited by: Skilbeck, M., 64–70. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
30. Neave, G., 1988. On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: an overview of recent trends in higher education in western Europe, 1986-1988. European Journal of Education, 23: 1–2.
31. Nixon, J., 1992. Evaluating the Whole Curriculum, Buckingham: Open University Press.
32. Norris, N., 1990. Understanding Educational Evaluation, London: Kogan Page.
33. Norris, N., 1995. Contracts, control and evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 10: 271–285.
34. Norris, N., Aspland, R., MacDonald, B., Schostak, J., and Zamorski, B., 1996. An Independent Evaluation of Comprehensive Curriculum Reform in Finland, Helsinki: National Board of Education.
35. Ouston, J., Fidler, B., and Earley, P., 1997. What do schools do after OFSTED--or before. School Leadership and Management, 17: 95–104.
36. Paquette, J., 1991. Social Purpose and Schooling: alternatives, agendas and issues, London: Falmer Press.
37. Pawson, R., and Tilley, N., 1997. Realistic Evaluation, London: Sage.
38. Rossi, P.H., Freeman, H.E., and Wright, S.R., 1979. Evaluation: a systematic approach, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39. Saxe, L., and Fine, M., 1981. Social Experiments: methods for design and evaluation, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40. Scriven, M., 1967. “ The methodology of evaluation ”. In Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, AERA Monograph on Curriculum Evaluation no. 1 Edited by: Tyler, R.W., Gagne, R.M., and Scriven, M., 39–83. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
41. Simons, H., 1987. Getting to Know Schools in a Democracy--the politics and process of evaluation, London: Falmer Press.
42. Stake, R.E., 1967. The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68(7): 523–540.
43. Stenhouse, L., 1975. An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development, London: Heinemann.
44. Stenhouse, L., 1983. Authority, Education and Emancipation, London: Heinemann.
45. Thomas, G., 1996. The new schools’ inspection system. Educational Management and Administration, 24: 355–369.
46. Torrance, H., 1997. “ Can testing raise educational standards? ”. In Educational Dilemmas: debate and diversity, Vol. 4: Quality in Education, Edited by: Watson, K., Modgil, C., and Modgil, S., London: Cassell.
47. Tyler, R., 1949. Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48. Waples, D., and Tyler, R., 1930. Research Methods and Teachers’ Problems: a manual for systematic studies of classroom procedure, New York, NY: Macmillan.