Gender issues and students' perceptions of instructors' immediacy and evaluation of teaching and course

Psychological Reports

Volumn 78, Issue 3 PART 1, 1996, Pages 835-839

  Rowden, Gail V ^a   Carlson, Robert E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012944631     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1996.78.3.835     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. ANDERSEN, J. F. (1979) Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 3. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. Pp. 543-559.
2. BERGQUIST, W. H., & PHILLIPS, S. R. (1977) A handbook for faculty development. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges.
3. BRUSCHKE, J., & GARTNER, C. (1991) Teaching as communicating: advice for the higher education classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19, 197-214.
4. KEARNEY, P., PLAX, T. G., & BURROUGHS, N. F. (1991) An attributional analysis of college students' resistance decisions. Communication Education, 40, 325-341.
5. MCCROSKEY, J. C., RICHMOND, V. P., SALLINEN, A., FAYER, J. M., & BARRACLOUGH, R. A. (1995) A cross-cultural and multi-behavioral analysis of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 44, 281-291.
6. MEHRABIAN, A. (1971) Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7. MEREDITH, G. M. (1976) Structure of the Teaching Analysis By Students (TABS). The Journal of Psychology, 92, 235-242.
8. POTTER, W. J., & EMANUEL, R. (1990) Students' preferences for communication styles and their relationship to achievement. Communication Education, 39, 234-249.
9. SANDLER, B. R. (1991) Women faculty at work in the classroom, or, why it still hurts to be a woman in labor. Communication Education, 40, 6-15.