An approach for predicting heterosis based on an additive, dominance and additive x additive model with environment interaction

Heredity

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 510-517

  Xu, Zi Cheng ^a,b   Zhu, Jun ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HENAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Epistasis model; GE interaction; Genetic effects; Heterosis prediction

Indexed keywords

EPISTASIS; GENETIC CROSS; GENOTYPIC VARIATION; HETEROSIS; HYBRIDIZATION; PLANT GENETICS;

EID: 0012762439     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884800     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BERNARDO, R. 1992. Relationship between single-cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity. Theor. Appl. Genet., 83, 628-634.
2. COCKERHAM, C. C. 1980. Random and fixed effects in plant genetics. Theor. Appl. Genet., 56, 119-131.
3. COWEN, N. M. AND FERY, K. J. 1987. Relationships between three measures of genetic distance and breeding behavior in oats (Avena sativa L.). Genome, 29, 97-106.
4. COX, T. S. AND MURPHY, J. P. 1990. The effect of parental divergence on heterosis in winter wheat crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet., 79, 241-250.
5. DING, F. Y., JIANG, J. P. AND ZHANG, D. X. 1987. A study on F1, F2 heterosis and the correlation between parents and hybrids in sesame. Sci. Agr. Sinica, 20, 70-76.
6. ENGQVIST, G. M. AND BECKER, H. C. 1991. Heterosis and epistasis in rapeseed estimated from generation means. Euphytica, 58, 31-35.
7. KETATA, H., SMITH, E. L., EDWARDS, L. H. AND MCNEW, R. W. 1976. Detection of epistatic, additive, and dominance variation in winter wheat (Tríticum aestivum L. em Thell.). Crop Sci., 16, 1-4.
8. KNIGHT, R. 1973. The relation between hybrid vigour and genotype x environment interaction. Theor. Appl. Genet., 43, 318-322.
9. MEREDITH, W. R., JR. 1990. Yield and fiber-quality potential for second-generation cotton hybrids. Crop Sci., 30, 1045-1048.
10. MILLER, R. G. 1974. The jackknife: a review. Biometrika, 61, 1-15.
11. MOLL, R. H., SALHUANA, W. S. AND ROBINSON, H. F. 1962. Heterosis and genetic diversity in variety crosses of maize. Crop Sci., 2, 197-198.
12. SCHNELL, F. W. AND COCKERHAM, C. C. 1992. Multiplicative vs. arbitrary gene action in heterosis. Genetics, 131, 461-469.
13. SMITH, O. S., SMITH, J. C. S., BOWEN, S. L., TENBORG, R. A. AND WALL, S. J. 1990. Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet., 80, 833-840.
14. STUBER, C. W., LINCOLN, S. E., WOLFF, D. W., HELENTJARIS, T. AND LANDER, E. S. 1992. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics, 132, 823-839.
15. VIRMANI, S. S., AQUINO, R. C. AND KHUSH, G. S. 1982. Heterosis breeding in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Theor. Appl. Genet., 63, 373-380.
16. YOUNG, J. B. AND VIRMANI, S. S. 1990. Heterosis in rice over environments. Euphytica, 51, 87-93.
17. ZHANG, Q., GAO, Y. J., YANG, S. H., RAGAB, R. A., SAGHAI MAROOF, M. A. AND LI, Z. B. 1994. A diallel analysis of heterosis in elite hybrid rice based on RFLPs and microsatellites. Theor. Appl. Genet., 89, 185-192.
18. ZHU, J. 1989. Estimation of Genetic Variance Components in the General Mixed Model. Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
19. ZHU, J. 1992. Mixed model approaches for estimating genetic variances and covariances. J. Biomath., 7, 1-11.
20. ZHU, J. 1993. Methods of predicting genotype value and heterosis for offspring of hybrids. J. Biomath., 8, 32-44.
21. ZHU, J. 1997. Analysis Methods for Genetic Models. Agricultural Publishing House of China, Peking.
22. ZHU, J. AND WEIR, B. S. 1996a. Mixed model approaches for diallel analysis based on a bio-model. Genet. Res., 68, 233-240.
23. ZHU, J. AND WEIR, B. S. 1996b. Diallel analysis for sex-linked and maternal effects. Theor. Appl. Genet., 92, 1-9.
24. ZHU, J., JI, D. F. AND XU, F. H. 1993. A genetic approach for analyzing intra-cultivar heterosis in crops. Acta Genetica Sinica, 20, 262-271.