Temporal distribution of information for human consonant recognition in VCV utterances

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 111-135

  Smits, Roel ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012720155     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2000.0107     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cooper F. S., Delattre P. C., Liberman A. M., Borst J. M., Gerstman L. J. Some experiments on the perception of synthetic speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 24:1952;597-606.
2. Fletcher H. Speech and hearing in communication. 1953;Krieger, New York.
3. Furui S. On the role of spectral transition for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 80:1986;1016-1025.
4. Grimm W. A. Perception of segments of English-spoken consonant-vowel syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 40:1966;1454-1461.
5. Harris K. S. Cues for the discrimination of American English fricatives in spoken syllables. Language and Speech. 1:1958;1-7.
6. 't Hart J., Cohen A. Gating techniques as an aid in speech analysis. Language and Speech. 7:1964;22-39.
7. Jongman A. Duration of frication noise required for identification of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 85:1989;1718-1725.
8. Kurowski K., Blumstein S. E. Acoustic properties for place of articulation in nasal consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 81:1987;1917-1927.
9. LaRiviere C., Winitz H., Herriman E. The distribution of perceptual cues in English prevocalic fricatives. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 18:1975;613-622.
10. Lisker, L. 1978, Rapid vs. rabid: a catalogue of acoustic features that may cue the distinction, SR-54, 127, 132.
11. MacCallum R. C. Effects of conditionality on INDSCAL and ALSCAL weights. Psychometrika. 42:1977;297-305.
12. Malécot A. The role of releases in the identification of released final stops. Language. 34:1958;370-380.
13. Mann V. A., Repp B. H. Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction. Perception and Psychophysics. 28:1980;213-228.
14. Manrique A. M. B. de, Massone M. I. Acoustic analysis and perception of Spanish fricative consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 69:1981;1145-1153.
15. Miller G. A., Nicely P. E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 27:1955;338-352.
16. Ohala J. J., Ohala M. Speech perception and lexical representation: the role of vowel nasalization in Hindi and English. Connell B., Arvaniti A. Phonology and phonetic evidence, papers in laboratory phonology IV. 1995;41-60 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Ohde R. N., Sharf D. J. Stop identification from vocalic transition plus vowel segments of CV and VC syllables: a follow-up study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 69:1981;297-300.
18. Öhman S. E. G. Perception of segments of VCCV utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 40:1966;979-988.
19. Pickett J. M., Bunnell H. T., Revoile S. G. Phonetics of intervocalic consonant perception: retrospect and prospect. Phonetica. 52:1995;1-40.
20. Pols L. C. W., Schouten M. E. H. Identification of deleted consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 64:1978;1333-1337.
21. Pols L. C. W. Coarticulation and the identification of initial and final plosives. Wolff J., Klatt D. ASA 50 speech communication papers. 1979;459-562 Acoustical Society of America, New York.
22. Recasens D. Place cues for nasal consonants with special reference to Catalan. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 73:1983;1346-1353.
23. Repp B. H. Perception of the [m]-[n] distinction in CV syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 79:1986;1987-1999.
24. Repp B. H., Svastikula K. Perception of the [m]-[n] distinction in VC syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 83:1988;237-247.
25. Schiffman S. S., Reynolds M. L., Young F. W. Introduction to multidimensional scaling. 1981;Academic, Orlando.
26. Schouten M. E. H., Pols L. C. W. Perception of plosive consonants - the relative contributions of bursts and vocalic transitions. van den Broecke M. P. R., van Heuven V. J. J. P., Zonneveld W. Sound structures: studies for Antonie Cohen. 1983;227-243 Foris, Dordrecht.
27. Sharf D. J., Hemeyer T. Identification of consonant articulation from vowel formant transitions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 51:1972;652-658.
28. Singh S. Distinctive features: a measure of consonant perception. Singh S. Measurement procedures in speech, hearing and language. 1975;93-155 University Park Press, Baltimore.
29. Smits R., Ten Bosch L., Collier R. Evaluation of various sets of acoustical cues for the perception of prevocalic stop consonants: I, perception experiment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 100:1996;3852-3864.
30. Soli S. D., Arabie P. Auditory versus phonetic accounts of observed confusions between consonant phonemes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 66:1979;46-59.
31. Takane Y., Young F. W., de Leeuw J. Non-metric individual differences multidimensional scaling: an alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika. 42:1977;7-67.
32. Wang M. D., Bilger R. C. Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 54:1973;1248-1266.
33. Whalen D. H. Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[∫] boundary. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 69:1981;275-282.