An experiment in the use of tools for computer-assisted abstracting

Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting

Volumn 33, Issue , 1996, Pages 203-206

  Craven, Timothy C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012670607     PISSN: 00447870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American National Standards Institute (1979). American national standard for writing abstracts (ANSI Z39.14-1979).
2. Burgin, R., & Dillon, M. (1992). Improving disambiguation in FASIT. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43 (2), 101-114.
3. Craven, T.C. (1988). Text network display editing with special reference to the production of customized abstracts. Canadian journal of information science. 13 (1/2), 59-68.
4. Craven, T.C. (1991a). Use of words and phrases from full text in abstracts. Journal of information science. 16, 351-358.
5. Craven, T.C. (1991b). Algorithms for graphic display of sentence dependency structures. Information processing and management. 27 (6), 603-613.
6. Craven, T.C. (1993). A computer-aided abstracting tool kit. Canadian journal of information science. 18 (2), 19-31.
7. Craven, T.C. (In press). Presentation of repeated phrases in a computer-assisted abstracting tool kit. Information processing and management
8. Endres-Niggemeyer, B. (1994). Summarizing text for intelligent communication: results of the Dagstuhl Seminar. Knowledge organization. 21 (4), 213-223.
9. Endres-Niggemeyer, B, Waumans, W, & Yamashita, H (1991). Modelling summary writing by introspection: a small-scale demonstrative study. Text. 11 (4), 523-552.
10. Fagan, J.L. (1989). The effectiveness of a nonsyntactic approach to automatic phrase indexing for document retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 40 (2), 115-132.
11. Jones, LP., Gassie, E.W., & Radhakrishnan, S. (1990). INDEX: the statistical basis for an automatic conceptual phrase-indexing system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41 (2), 87-97.
12. Kaplan, R.B., Cantor, S., Hagstrom, C., Kamhi-Stein, L.D., Shiotani, Y., & Zimmerman, C.B. (1994). On abstract writing. Text. 14 (3), 401-426.
13. Kozma, R.B. (1991). The impact of computer-based tools and embedded prompts on writing processes and products of novice and advanced college writers. Cognition and instruction, 8 (1), 1-27.
14. Nielsen, J. (1994). Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test. International Journal of human-computer studies. 41, 385-397.
15. Paice, C. (1990). Constructing literature abstracts by computer: techniques and prospects. Information processing and management. 26 (1), 171-186.
16. Paijmans, H. (1993). Comparing the document representations of two IR systems: CLARIT and TOPIC. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 44 (7), 383-392.
17. Salager-Meyer, F. (1991). Medical English abstracts: how well are they structured?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42 (7), 528-531.
18. Simpson, E.H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature. 163, 688.
19. R & TH Inc (1994). WinSpell version 3.08: the Windows spelling supervisor. Richardson, Texas: R & TH Inc.
20. SPSS Inc. (1993). SPSS for Windows. Release 6.0 (Jun 17 1993).
21. Tibbo, H.R. (1992). Abstracting across the disciplines: a content analysis of abstracts from the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval. Library and information science research, 14 (1), 31-56.
22. Van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1985). Cognitive psychology and discourse: recalling and summarizing stories. In H. Singer, &R.B. Ruddell (Ed.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, third edition (pp. 794-812). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.