Mentoring as assisted performance: A pair of Chinese teachers working together

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 157-181

  Wang, Jian ^a   Paine, Lynn W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012630197     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/499698     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ball, D. L., & McDiarmid, G. W. (1989). The subject matter preparation of teachers (Issue Paper 89-4). East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
2. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20.
3. Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 61(3), 279-310.
4. Cochran-Smith, M., & Paris, P. L. (1992, April). Mentor and mentoring: Did Homer have it right? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
5. Dai, Z. P. (1998). Woguo shuxue jiaoxue fangfa de gaige (Reform of mathematics teaching methods in China). In D. Z. Zhang (Ed.), Shuxue jiaoyu yanjiu daoyin (A guide to the research of mathematics education) (pp. 130-136). Nanjing: Jiangsu Educational Publishing House.
6. Dembele, M. (1995). Mentors and mentoring: Frames for action, ways of acting, and consequences for novice teachers' learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
7. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier.
8. Edwards, A., & Collison, J. (1996). Mentoring and developing practice in primary schools: Supporting student teacher learning in schools. Buckingham: Open University Press.
9. Feiman-Nemser, S. (1995, April). Mentoring in the service of reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
10. Feiman-Nemser, S. (1998). Linking mentoring and teacher learning. VELON, June-July (3), 5-13.
11. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1987). When is student teaching teacher education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(4), 255-273.
12. Feiman-Nemser, S., Carver, C., Schwille, S., & Yusko, B. (2000). Beyond support: Taking new teachers seriously as learners. In M. Scherer (Ed.), A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers (pp. 3-12). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
13. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, M. B. (1992). Mentoring in context: A comparison of two U.S. programs for beginning teachers (NCRTL special report). East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
14. Gehrke, N. J. (1988). On preserving the essence of mentoring as one form of teacher leadership. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 43-45.
15. Gold, Y. (1996). Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring and induction. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2d ed., pp. 548-594). New York: Macmillan.
16. Gu, L. Y. (1991). Qingpu shuxue jiaogai jingyan (Reform of mathematics teaching: Experience from Qingpu County). In Learning to teach (Xuehui jiaoxue) (pp. 182-195). Beijing: People's Educational Publishing House.
17. Hargreaves, A., & Dawe, R. (1990). Paths of professional development: Contrived collegiality, collaborative culture, and the case of peer coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(3), 227-241.
18. Kennedy, M. (1991a). An agenda for research on teacher learning (NCRTL special report). East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
19. Kennedy, M. (1991b). Some surprising findings on how teachers learn to teach. Educational Leadership, 49(3), 14-17.
20. Kush, T. M., & Ball, D. L. (1986). Approaches to teaching mathematics: Mapping the domains of knowledge, skills, and dispositions. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Center on Teacher Education.
21. Lave, J. (1977). Tailor-made experiments and evaluating the intellectual consequences of apprenticeship training. Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development, 1, 1-3.
22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
24. Noddings, N. (1985). Formal modes of knowing. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing (pp. 116-131). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Paine, L. W. (1990). Teacher as virtuoso: A Chinese model for teaching. Teachers College Record, 92(1), 49-81.
26. Paine, L. W. (1997). Chinese teachers as mirrors of reform possibilities. In W. K. Cummings & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), The challenge of Eastern Asian education (pp. 65-83). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
27. Paine, L., & Ma, L. (1993). Teachers working together: A dialogue on organizational and cultural perspectives of Chinese teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(8), 675-697.
28. Putnam, R. T., Lampert, M., & Peterson, P. (1990). Alternative perspectives on knowing mathematics in elementary schools. Review of Research in Education, 16(57), 57-150.
29. Resnick, L. (1983). Mathematics and science learning: A new conception. Science, 220(4596), 477-478.
30. Rogoff, B. (1984). Introduction: Thinking and learning in social contexts. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 1-8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Romberg, T. A. (1992). Problematic features of the school mathematics curriculum. In P. N. Sackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 749-788). New York: Macmillan.
32. Sanders, D., & McCutcheon, G. (1986). The development of practical theories of teaching. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2(1), 50-67.
33. Shanghai zhongxiaoxue kecheng jiaocai gaige weiyuanhui (Shanghai secondary and elementary curriculum and teaching materials reform commission). (2000). Mianxiang 21 shiji zhongxiaoxue xin kecheng fangan he ge xueke jiaoyu gaige xingdong gangling (Framework for new curriculum policy and subject-specific education for the twenty-first century). Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
34. Smith III, J. P. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 387-402.
35. Tharp, G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Tomlinson, P. (1995). Understanding mentoring: Reflective strategies for school-based teacher preparation. Buckingham: Open University Press.
37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygosky reader (pp. 338-354). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
39. Wang, J. (1998). Learning to teach mathematics: Preservice teachers, their collaborative teachers and instructional contexts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.