Policies in accountable contracts

Proceedings - 3rd International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, POLICY 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 80-91

  Shand, B ^a   Bacon, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTING POLICY; COMPUTER SERVICES; CONTRACT ARCHITECTURE; CONTRACT PERFORMANCE; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTATIONS; PHYSICAL RESOURCES; RESOURCE ECONOMY; TRUST RELATIONSHIP;

COMPUTER NETWORKS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

NETWORK SECURITY;

EID: 0012617783     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/POLICY.2002.1011296     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. A. Abdul-Rahman and S. Hailes. Supporting trust in virtual communities. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 33, pp. 1769-1777, Jan. 2000.
2. J. Bacon, K. Moody, and W. Yao. Access control and trust in the use of widely distributed services. In Proceedings Middleware 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2218, pp. 295-310, 2001.
3. M. Blaze, J. Feigenbaum, and J. Lacy. Decentralized trust management. In Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 164-173, May 1996.
4. S. Brainov and T. Sandholm. Contracting with an uncertain level of trust. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pp. 15-21, Denver, CO USA, Nov. 1999.
5. A. Daskalopulu, T. Dimitrakos, and T. Maibaum. Econtract fulfilment and agents' attitudes. In ERCIM WG E-Commerce Workshop on The Role of Trust in e-Business, Zurich, Oct. 2001.
6. H. de Soto. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in theWest and Fails Everywhere Else. Bantam Press, London, 2000.
7. C. Dellarocas. Immunizing online reputation reporting systems against unfair ratings and discriminatory behavior. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 150-157, Minneapolis, MN, Oct. 2000.
8. C. Ellison and B. Schneier. Ten risks of PKI: What you're not being told about public key infrastructure. Computer Security Journal, 16(1):1-7, 2000.
9. M. Faloutsos, P. Faloutsos, and C. Faloutsos. On power-law relationships of the internet topology. In SIGCOMM 1999, pp. 251-262, 1999.
10. P. Gevros, J. Crowcroft, P. Kirstein, and S. Bhatt. Congestion control mechanisms and the best effort service model. IEEE Network, 15(3):16-26, 2001.
11. M. Gisler, H. Häuschen, Y. Jöhri, A. Meier, O. Müller, B. Schopp, and K. Stanoevska. Requirements on secure electronic contracts. Technical Report MCM-institute-1999-01, University of St Gallen, 1999.
12. L. Gong, M. Mueller, H. Prafullchandra, and R. Schemers. Going beyond the sandbox: An overview of the new security architecture in the Java Development Kit 1.2. In USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, pp. 103-112, 1997.
13. P. Grim. The greater generosity of the spatialized prisonersdilemma. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 173(4):353-359, Apr. 1995.
14. R. Jagannathan. Dataflow models. In E. Zomaya, editor, Parallel and Distributed Computing Handbook, chapter 8. McGrawHill, 1996.
15. A. Jøsang. A logic for uncertain probabilities. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 9(3):279-311, June 2001.
16. M. F. Kaashoek, D. R. Engler, G. R. Ganger, H. M. Briceño, R. Hunt, D. Mazières, T. Pinckney, R. Grimm, J. Janotti, and K. Mackenzie. Application performance and flexibility on exokernel systems. In Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pp. 52-65, 1997.
17. S. T. Kuhn. Prisoner's dilemma. In E. N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, summer 2001 edition, 2001. [Online]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2001/ entries/prisoner-dilemma/.
18. P. F. Linington, Z. Milosevic, and K. Raymond. Policies in communities: Extending the ODP enterprise viewpoint. In 2nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop, pp. 11-22, Nov. 1998.
19. PPARC. Internet to SuperNet-the DATAGRID project, Jan. 2001. [Online]. Available: http://www.pparc. ac.uk/nw/supernet.asp.
20. D. Reed, I. Pratt, P. Menage, S. Early, and N. Stratford. Xenoservers: accountable execution of untrusted code. In IEEE Hot Topics in Operating Systems (HotOS) VII, pp. 136-141, Mar. 1999.
21. T. Sandholm and V. Lesser. Issues in automated negotiation and electronic commerce: Extending the contract net framework. In First International Conference on Multiagent Systems (ICMAS-95), pp. 328-335, San Fransisco, 1995.
22. A. Silberschatz and P. B. Galvin. Operating System Concepts. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA, 1998.
23. N. Szabo. Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday, 2(9), 1997. [Online]. Available: http://www.firstmonday.dk/.
24. G. van Rossum. Python library reference, July 2001. [Online]. Available: http://www.python.org/doc/ref/.
25. C. A. Waldspurger and W. E. Weihl. Stride scheduling: Deterministic proportional-share resource management. Technical Report MIT/LCS/TM-528, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 1995.
26. E. W. Zegura, K. L. Calvert, and M. J. Donahoo. A quantitative comparison of graph-based models for Internet topology. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 5(6):770-783, 1997.