Pedagogic Discourse in the Post-Compulsory Years: Pedagogic Subject Positioning

Linguistics and Education

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 313-331

  Christie, Frances ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012593544     PISSN: 08985898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00031-0     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. Class, codes and Control (Vol. IV). London: Routledge.
2. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. Theory, research, critique. In A. Luke (Series Ed.), Critical perspectives on literacy and education. London: Taylor & Francis.
3. Christie, F. (1989). Curriculum genres in early childhood education: A case study in writing development. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
4. Christie, F. (1991a). First and second order registers in education. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics. Approaches and uses. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs (Vol. 55, pp. 235-256). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
5. Christie, F. (1991b). Pedagogical and content registers in a writing lesson. Linguistics and Education, 3, 203-224.
6. Christie, F. (1994). On pedagogic discourse. Final report of a research activity funded by the Australian Research Council 1990-2. University of Melbourne.
7. Christie, F. (1995a). Pedagogic discourse in the primary school. Linguistics and Education, 3(7), 221-242.
8. Christie, F. (1995b). The teaching of literature in the secondary English class. Report 1 of a research study into the pedagogic discourse of secondary school English. A study funded by the Australian Research Council. University of Melbourne.
9. Christie, F. (1995c). The teaching of story writing in the junior secondary school. Report 2 of a research study into the pedagogic discourse of secondary school English. A study funded by the Australian Research Council. University of Melbourne.
10. Christie, F. (1996). Geography. The pedagogic discourse of secondary school social sciences. A study funded by the Australian Research Council. University of Melbourne.
11. Christie, F. (1997). Curriculum genres as forms of initiation into a culture. In F. Christie, & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 134-160). London: Cassell.
12. Christie, F. (1998). Science and apprenticeship. In J.R. Martin, & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 152-177). London: Routledge.
13. Christie, F. (1999). The pedagogic device and the teaching of English. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 156-184). London: Cassell.
14. Christie, F., Martin, J.R. (Eds.). (1997). Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell.
15. Cranny-Francis, A. (1996). Technology and/or weapon: The discipline of reading in the secondary classroom. In R. Hasan, & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 172-190). London: Longman.
16. Green, J., Dixon, C. (Eds.). (1993). Special issue: Santa Barbara classroom discourse group. Linguistics and Education, 5, 3-4.
17. Hasan, R. (1980). What's going on? A dynamic view of context in language. In J.E. Copeland, & P.W. Davis (Eds.), The Seventh LACUS Forum (pp. 106-121). Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press. Reprinted in Cloran, C., Butt, D., & Williams, G. (1996). Ways of saying: Ways of meaning (pp. 37-50). London: Cassell.
18. Hasan, R. (1980). What's going on? A dynamic view of context in language. In J.E. Copeland, & P.W. Davis (Eds.), The Seventh LACUS Forum (pp. 106-121). Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press. Reprinted in Cloran, C., Butt, D., & Williams, G. (1996). Ways of saying: Ways of meaning (pp. 37-50). London: Cassell.
19. Hasan, R. (1984). The nursery rhyme as a genre. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 13, 71-102. Reprinted in a revised version in C. Cloran, D. Butt, & G. Williams (Eds.). (1996). Ways of saying: Ways of meaning (pp. 51-72). London: Cassell.
20. Hasan, R. (1984). The nursery rhyme as a genre. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 13, 71-102. Reprinted in a revised version in C. Cloran, D. Butt, & G. Williams (Eds.). (1996). Ways of saying: Ways of meaning (pp. 51-72). London: Cassell.
21. Hunter, I. (1994). Four anxieties about English. Interpretations, 27(3), 1-19.
22. Love, K. (1999). The whole class text response discussion genre in secondary English: A case study. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne.
23. Macken-Horarik, M. (1996). Literacy practices in English. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
24. Macken-Horarik, M. (1998). Exploring the requirements of critical school literacy: A view from two classrooms. In F. Christie, & R. Misson (Eds.), Literacy and schooling: New directions (pp. 74-103). London: Routledge.
25. Martin, J.R. (1994). Macro-genres: The ecology of the page. Network, 21, 29-52.
26. Martin, J.R. (1995). Text and clause: Fractal resonance. Text, 15(1), 5-42.
27. Rothery, J. (1994). Exploring literacy in school English. Resources for literacy and learning. Sydney: Disadvantaged Schools Program Metropolitan East Region, NSW Department of School Education.
28. Rothery, J., & Christie, F. (1995). The craft of writing narrative Interpretations. Special Edition: Linguistics and English, 28(3), 77-96.
29. Rothery, J., & Stenglin, M. (1997). Entertaining and instructing: Exploring experience through story. In F. Christie, & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions. Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 231-263). London: Cassell.
30. Unsworth, L. (1995). How and why: Recontextualizing science explanations in school science books. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
31. Veel, R. (1997). Learning how to mean-scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In F. Christie, & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions. Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 161-195). London: Cassell.
32. Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5(1), 1-38.