Social dimensions in the architecture of Neolithic Çatalhöyük

Anatolian Studies

Volumn 51, Issue , 2001, Pages 1-18

  Düring, Bleda S ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012516146     PISSN: 00661546     EISSN: 20480849     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3643025     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allison, P M. 1999: ‘Introduction’ in Allison, P M (ed), The Archaeology of Household Activities. London: 1–18
2. Angel, L. 1971: ‘Early Neolithic skeletons from Çatal Hüyük: demography and pathology’ Anatolian Studies. 21: 77–98
3. Brown, F E. 1990: ‘Comments on Chapman: some cautionairy notes on the application of spatial measures to Prehistoric settlement’ in Samson, R. (ed), The Social Archaeology of Houses. Edinburgh: 93–109
4. Burnham, H B. 1965: ‘Çatal Hüyük: the textiles and twined fabrics’ Anatolian Studies. 15: 169–74
5. Cessford, C. 1999: ‘The excavation of the North Area 1998’ in ‘Micromorphology’ in Archive Reports 1998: http://catal.arch.cam.ac.uk/catal/catal.html
6. Chapman, J. 1990: ‘Social inequality on Bulgarian tells and the Varna problem’ in Samson, R. (ed), The Social Archaeology of Houses. Edinburgh: 49–92
7. De Jesus, P S. 1985: ‘Notes on the symbolism in Catal Hüyük wall paintings’ in Huot, J L, Yon, M, Calvet, Y (eds), De l'Indus aux Balkans: recueil a la mémoire de Jean Deshayes. Paris: 127–45
8. Dietrich, B C. 1967: ‘Some light from the east on Cretan cult practice’ Historia. 16: 385–413
9. Donley-Reid, L W. 1990: ‘A structuring structure: the Swahili house’ in Kent, S (ed), Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space: an Interdisciplinary Cross-Cultural Study (New Directions in Archaeology). Cambridge: 114–26
10. Ducos, P. 1988: Archéozoologie quantitative: les valeurs numériques immédiàtes à Çatal Hüyük (Cahiers du Quatemaire 12). Paris
11. Esin, U. 1998: ‘The Aceramic site of Aşikli and its ecological conditions based on its floral and faunal remains’ TUBA-AR. 1: 63–94
12. Esin, U. 1999: ‘Aşikli’ in Özdoğan, M, Başgelen, N (eds), The Neolithic of Turkey. Istanbul: 115–32
13. Ferembach, D. 1972: ‘Les hommes du gisement Néolithique de Çatal Hüyük’ Türk Tarih Kongresi. 1 (1970): 13–21
14. Ferembach, D. 1982: Mesures et indices des squelettes humains Neolithiques de Çatal Hüyük (Turquie). Paris
15. Forest, J. D. 1993: ‘Çatal Hüyük et son decor: pour le dechiffrement d'une code symbolique’ Anatolia Antiqua. 2: 1–42
16. Hamilton, N. 1996: ‘Figurines, clay balls, small finds and burials’ in Hodder, I (ed), On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–95. Cambridge: 215–63
17. Harmankaya, S, Tanındı, O, Özbaşaran, M, 1997: Türkiye Arkeoloji Yereşlemeleri 2: Neolithik. Istanbul
18. Heinrich, E, Seidl, U, 1969: ‘Zur Siedlungsform von Çatal Hüyük’ Archäologischer Anzeiger. 84/2: 113–19
19. Hillier, B, Hanson, J, 1984: The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge
20. Hodder, I. 1987: ‘Contextual archaeology: an interpretation of Catal Hüyük and a discussion of the origins of agriculture’ Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology of the University of London. 24: 43–56
21. Hodder, I. 1990: The Domestication of Europe: Structure and Contingency in Neolithic Societies. Cambridge
22. Hodder, I. 1996a: ‘Re-opening Çatalhöyük’ in Hodder, I (ed), On the Surface: Catalhöyük 1993–95. Cambridge: 1–18
23. Hodder, I. 1996b: ‘Çatalhöyük: 9000 year old housing and settlement in central Anatolia’ in Sey, Y (ed), Housing and Settlement in Anatolia, an Historical Perspective. Istanbul: 43–8
24. Hodder, I. 1998: ‘The domus: some problems reconsidered’ in Edmonds, M, Richards, C (eds), Understanding the Neolithic of Northwestern Europe. Glasgow: 84–101
25. Hodder, I. 1999: ‘Symbolism at Çatalhöyük’ in Coles, J, Bewley, R, Mellars, P (eds), World Prehistory: Studies in Memory of Grahame Clark (Proceedings of the British Academy 99). London: 177–91
26. Last, J. 1998: ‘A design for life: interpreting the art of Çatalhöyük’ Journal of Material Culture. 3/3: 355–78
27. Macqueen, J G. 1978: ‘Secondary burial at Çatal Hüyük’ NUMEN - International Review for the History of Religions. 25/3: 226–39
28. Matthews, R. 1996: ‘Surface scraping and planning’ in Hoddder, I (ed), On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–95. Cambridge: 79–100
29. Matthews, W. 1997: ‘Microstratigraphy, micromorphology and sampling report’ in Archive Reports 1996: http://catal.arch.cam.ac.uk/catal/catal.html
30. Matthews, W. 1999: ‘Report on sampling, strategies, microstratigraphy and micromorphology’ in Archive Reports 1998: http://catal.arch.cam.ac.uk/catal/catal.html
31. Matthews, W. Farid, S, 1996: ‘Exploring the 1960s surface: the stratigraphy of Çatalhöyük’ in Hodder, I (ed), On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–95. Cambridge: 271–300
32. Mellaart, J. 1962: ‘Excavations at Çatal Hüyük: first preliminary report, 1961’ Anatolian Studies. 12: 41–65
33. Mellaart, J. 1963: ‘Excavations at Çatal Hüyük: second preliminary report, 1962’ Anatolian Studies. 13: 43–103
34. Mellaart, J. 1964: ‘Excavations at Çatal Hüyük: third preliminary report, 1963’ Anatolian Studies. 14: 39–119
35. Mellaart, J. 1966: ‘Excavations at Çatal Hüyük: fourth preliminary report, 1965’ Anatolian Studies. 16: 135–56
36. Mellaart, J. 1967: Çatal Hüyük: A Neolithic town in Anatolia. London
37. Mellaart, J (ed) 1970: Excavations at Hacilar. Edinburgh
38. Mellaart, J. 1975: The Neolithic of the Near East. London
39. Mellaart, J. 1989: ‘Neolithic chronology at Çatal Hüyük?’ in Emre, K, Mellink, M, Hrouda, B, Özgüç, N (eds), Anatolia and the Ancient Near East: Studies in Honor of Tahsın Özgüç. Ankara, 315–18
40. Omura, M. 1984: ‘A reinterpretation of the figurines of Çatal Hüyük’ Orient. 20: 129–50
41. Özdoğan, M. Özdoğan, A. 1998: ‘Buildings of cult and the cult of buildings’ in Arsebük, G, Mellink, M J, Schirmer, W (eds), Light on Top of the Black Hill: Studies Presented to Halet Çambel. Istanbul: 581–601
42. Parish, R. 1996: ‘Luminescence dating of mud brick from Çatalhöyük’ in Hodder, I (ed), On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–95. Cambridge: 343–4
43. Parker Pearson, M. Richards, C (eds) 1994: Architecture and Order: Approaches to Social Space. London
44. Perkins, D. 1969: ‘Fauna of Çatalhöyük: evidence for early cattle domestication in Anatolia’ Science. 64: 177–9
45. Ritchey, T. 1996: ‘Note: building complexity’ in Hodder, I (ed), On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–95. Cambridge: 7–18
46. Roberts, N. 1982: ‘A note on the geomorphological environment of Çatal Hüyük, Turkey’ Journal of Archaeological Science. 9: 341–8
47. Ryder, M L. 1965: ‘Report of textiles from Çatal Hüyük’ Anatolian Studies. 15: 175–6
48. Sanders, D. 1990: ‘Behavioral conventions and archaeology: methods for the analysis of ancient architecture’ in Kent, S (ed), Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space: an Interdisciplinary Cross-Cultural Study (New Directions in Archaeology). Cambridge: 43–72
49. Stevanovic, M. Tringham, R. 1999: ‘The Bach 1 Area’ Archive Reports 1998: http://catal.arch.cam.ac.uk/catal/catal.html
50. Thissen, L C. 2000, Early Village Communities in Anatolia and the Balkans 6500–5500 cal BC: Studies in Chronology and Culture Contact. (unpublished PhD thesis). Leiden
51. Todd, I A. 1976: Çatal Hüyük in Perspective. Menlo Park, California
52. Vogelsang-Eastwood, G M. 1988: ‘A re-examination of the fibres from the Çatal Hüyük textiles’ Oriental Carpet and Textile Studies. 3/1: 15–19
53. Wilk, R R. Rathje, W L. 1982: ‘Household archaeology’ American Behavioral Scientist. 25/6: 617–39