Is Information Systems a Science? An Inquiry into the Nature of the Information Systems Discipline

Data Base for Advances in Information Systems

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 24-42

  Khazanchi, Deepak ^a   Munkvold, Bjørn Erik ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Characteristics of scientific fields; Information systems discipline; Philosophy of science; Scientific inquiry

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012488160     PISSN: 00950033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/381823.381834     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Avgerou, C., Siemer, J., and Bjarn-Andersen, N. (1999). “The Academic Field of Information Systems in Europe,” European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 8, pp. 136–153.
2. Avgerou, C., and Cornford, T. (1995). “Limitations of Information Systems Theory and Practice: A Case for Piuralism,” in Falkenberg et al. Information Systems Concepts: Towards a Consolidation of Views, London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 130–143.
3. Banville, C., and Landry, M. (1989). “Can the Field of MIS Be Disciplined?” Communications of the ACM, January, pp. 48–59.
4. Benbasat, I., and Zmud, R. W. (1999). “Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 3–16.
5. Benbasat, I., and Weber, R. (1996). “Research Commentary: Rethinking ‘Diversity’,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 389–399.
6. Blumenthal, H. (1998). “Ready to Get Your Degree in IS?-We Need More IS Grads to Fill the Growing Holes in Corporate Departments,” Netscape Enterprise Developer, January, http://www. ne-dev.com/ned-01-1998/ned-01-enterprise. t. html (Accessed 19 October 1998).
7. Boland, R. J., Jr. (1986). “Fantasies in Information Systems,” Advances in Public Interest Accounting, pp. 49–65. (cited in Cushing, 1990).
8. Burrell, G., and Morgan, G., (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company.
9. Checkland, R., and Holwell, S., (1998). Information, Systems and Information Systems-Making Sense of the Field. Chichester: Wiley and Sons.
10. Cheon, M., Grover, V., and Sabherwal, R. (1993). “The Evolution of Empirical Research In IS: A Study in IS Maturity, Information & Management, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 107–119.
11. Churchman, C. W. (1971). The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization. New York: Basic Books Inc., Publishers.
12. Ciborra, C. U. (1998). “Crisis and Foundations: An Inquiry into the Nature and Limits of Models and Methods in the Information Systems Discipline,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 5–16.
13. Culnan, M. (1987). “Mapp. ng the Intellectual Structure of MIS, 1980–85: A Co-Citation Analysis,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 340–353.
14. Culnan, M., and Swanson, E. B. (1986). “Research in Management Information Systems, 1980–1984: Points of Work and Reference,” MiS Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 289–301.
15. Cushing, B. E. (1990). “Frameworks, Paradigms, and Scientific Research in Management Information Systems,” The Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 38–59.
16. Davenport, T. (1997). “Storming the Ivory Tower,” CIO Magazine, http://www. cio.com/archive /041597_think_content. html (Accessed 29 September 1998).
17. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, RR. (1989). “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982–1003.
18. Davis, G. B., Gorgone, J. T., Couger, J. D., Feinstein, D. L., and Longnecker, Jr., H.E. IS’97: Model Curriculum and Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems. The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 1997, 28, 1, Winter
19. Denning, P. J. et al. (1989). “Computing as a Discipline,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 9–23.
20. Dickson, G. W., Emery, J. C., Ives, B., King, W. R., and McFarlan, F. W. (1993). “Professionai Societies: A Service to Members and Professional Leadership,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. iii–vi.
21. Ein-Dor, R., and Segev, E. (1993). “A Classification of Information Systems: Analysis and Interpretation,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 166–204.
22. Falkenberg, E. D. et al. (1998). A Framework of Information System Concepts: The FRISCO Report, IFIP, Department of Computer Science, University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
23. Falkenberg, E. D., Hesse, W., and Olive, A. (Editors) (1995). Information Systems Concepts: Towards a Consolidation of Views. London: Chapman & Hall.
24. Farhoomand, A. F., and Drury, D. H. (1999). “A Historiographical Examination of Information Systems,” Communications of theAlS, Vol. 1, Article 19.
25. Frankfort-Nachmias, C., and Nachmias, D., (1998). Research Methods in the Social Sciences, (Fifth Edition). St. Martin's Press, Inc.
26. Friedman, A. L. (1994). “The Information Technology Field: Using Fields and Paradigms for Analyzing Technological Change,” Human Relations, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 367–391.
27. Galliers, R. (1997). “Reflections on Information Systems Research: Twelve Points of Debate,” in Mingers, J. & Stowell, F. (Eds.) Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? London: McGraw Hill, pp. 141–157.
28. Galliers, R. D. (1985), “In Search of a Paradigm for Information Systems Research,” in Mumford, E. et al. Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 281–297.
29. Gosain, S. Lee, Z., and Im, I. (1997). “Topics of Interest in IS: Comparing Academic Journals with the Practitioner Press,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, December 15–17, pp. 263–284.
30. Hirschheim, R. A., (1985). “Information Systems Epistemology: A Historical Perspective,” in Mumford, E. et al. Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 13–36.
31. Hunt, S. D. (1992). “Marketing Is,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 20, Iss. 4, pp. 301–322.
32. Hunt, S. D. (1991). Modern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science, Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Company.
33. Hunt, S. D. (1983). Marketing Theory: The Philosophy of Marketing Science, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
34. Hunt, S. D. (1990). “Truth in Marketing Theory and Research,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 1–16.
35. IEEE, (1994). IEEE Software Engineering Standards, Fourth Edition. The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, 1993.
36. Sanders, J., and Curran, E. Software Quality. A Framework for Success in Software Development and Support, Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley.)
37. Ingwersen, P. (1996). “Information and Information Science in Context,” in Oliasen, J., Erland, M-P, and Wilson, R., Informing Science: From the Development of the Discipline to Social Interaction, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 69–111.
38. Introna, L., and Whitley, E. A. (1997), “Imagine: Thought Experiments in Information Systems Research,” in Lee, A. S., Liebenau, J., and DeGross, J. L. (Eds.), Information Systems and Qualitative Research. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 481–496.
39. ISWorld Digest, (1999). “Final Comment from Joseph Williams on MISQ and Capstone Journals. Sent to ISWorld by Williams, Joseph. Added: 20–05-1999,” The thread of this discussion is available at http://www. http: //www.commerce. uq. edu. au/isworld/announ ce/ (Accessed 21st July, 1999).
40. Johannessen, J. (1996). “The Cognitive Authority of Information: Information Science, the Theory of Science and Ethics,” in Olaisen, J., Erland, M-R., and Wilson, R., Information Science: From the Development of the Discipline to Social Interaction, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 113–134.
41. Jones, M. (1997). “It All Depends on What You Mean by Discipline,” in Mingers, J., and Stowell, F. (Eds.), Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? London: McGraw Hill, pp. 97–112.
42. Kaplan, A. (1964). The Conduct of inquiry, Scranton, PA: Chandler Publishing Co.
43. King, J. L. (1993). “Editorial Notes,” information Systems Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 291–298.
44. Klein, H. K., and Lyytinen, K. (1985). “The Poverty of Scientism in Information Systems,” in Mumford, E. et al. Research Methods in information Systems, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 131–161.
45. Lau, F. (1997). “A Review of the Use of Action Research in Information Systems Studies,” in Lee, A. S., Liebenau, J., and DeGross, J. L. (Eds.), information Systems and Qualitative Research, London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 31–68.
46. Laudon, K. C., and Laudon, J. R. (1984). Management information Systems: Organization and Technoiogy (3rd Edition), New York: McMillan Publishing, Inc.
47. Lee, A. S. (1999). “Rigor and Relevance in MIS Research: Beyind the Approach of Positivism Alone,” MiS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 2934.
48. Lee, A. S. (1991). “Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research,” Organizational Science, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 342–365.
49. Lee, A. S., Liebenau, J., and DeGross, J.L. (Editors), (1997). information Systems and Qualitative Research, London: Chapman & Hall.
50. Lucas, H. C., Jr. (1990). information Systems Concepts for Management (4th edition), New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, pp. 21–22.
51. Lyytinen, K. (1999). “Empirical Research in Information Systems: On the Relevance of Practice in Thinking of IS Research,” MiS Quarteriy, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 25–28.
52. Lyytinen, K., (1987). “Different Perspectives on Information Systems: Problems and Solutions,” ACM Computing Surveys, Vol 19, No. 1, pp. 5–35.
53. Markus, M. L. (1999). “Thinking the Unthinkable: What Happ. ns if the IS Field as We Know it Goes Away?” Claremont Graduate School, 1996. Also now published in W. Currie and R.
54. Mingers, J., and Stowell, F. (Eds.) (1997). information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? London: McGraw Hill.
55. Morgan, G. (1983). Beyond Method. Strategies for Social Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56. Mumford, E., Fitzgerald, G., Hirschheim, R. A., and Wood-Harper, A. T. (1985). “Information Systems Research Methodology: An Introduction to the Debate,” in Mumford, E. et al. Research Methods in information Systems, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 3–9.
57. Olaisen, J., Erland, M-R., and Wilson, P. (1996). information Science: From the Development of the Discipline to Social interaction, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
58. Orlikowski, W. J., and Baroudi, J. J. (1991). “Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1–28.
59. Rand, H. (1998). “Science, Non-Science, and Nonsense,” Vital Speeches of the Day, Vol. 64, No. 9, pp. 282–284.
60. Robey, D. (1996). “Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility,” information Systems Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 400–408.
61. Saunders, C. (Ed.). (1998). “The Role of Business in Information Technology Research,” Special 10th Anniversary issue of the information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1.
62. Swanson, E. W., and Ramiller, N. C. (1993). “Information Systems Research Thematics: Submissions to a New Journal, 1987–1992,” information Systems Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 299–358.
63. Trauth, E. M., Farwell, D. W., and Lee, D. (1993). “The IS Expectation Gap: Industry Expectations Versus Academic Preparation,” MiS Quarteriy, pp. 293–303.
64. Walsham, G. (1995a). “Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method,” European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 4, pp. 74–81.
65. Walsham, G. (1995b). “The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 376–394.
66. Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations, Chichester; John Wiley & Sons.
67. Watson, H. J., Taylor, K. R., Higgins, G., Kadlec, C., and Meeks, M. (1999). “Leaders Assess the Current State of the Academic IS Discipline,” Communications of the AiS, Vol. 2.
68. Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Oxford: Clarendon Press.