Separation of sources: A method for speech enhancement

Applied Signal Processing

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 177-190

  Nguyen Thi, H L ^a   Jutten, C ^a   Kabre H ^a   Caelen, J ^a  

^a GRENOBLE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (France)

Author keywords

Convolutive mixture; Cumulants; Higherorder statistics; Pre processing; Separation of sources; Speech enhancement; Speech recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012476314     PISSN: 09410635     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Boll SF. Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Sig Process 1979; ASSP-27(2): 113-120
2. Um JS, Oppenheim AV. All-pole modeling of degraded speech. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Sig Process 1978; ASSP-26(3): 197-210
3. Salavedra JM, Masgrau E, Moreno A, Estarellas J. Some robust speech enhancement techniques using higher order AR estimation. In: Holt M, Cowan C, Grant P, Sandham, W (eds). Signal processing VII: Theories and applications, EUSIPCO-94, Edinburgh, UK September 1994, pp 1194-1197
4. Widrow B et al. Adaptive noise cancelling: principles and applications. Proc IEEE 1975; 63: 1692-1716
5. Harrison WA, Um JS, Singer E. A new application of adaptive noise cancellation. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Sig Process 1986; ASSP-34(1): 699-708
6. Pulsipher D, Boll SF, Rushforth C, Timothy L. Reduction of nonstationary acoustic noise in speech using LMS adaptive noise cancelling. In: Proceedings of ICASSP-79, Washington, USA, April 1979; pp 204-207
7. Feder M, Oppenheim AV, Weinstein E. Maximum like-lihood noise cancellation using the EM algorithm. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Sig Process 1989; ASSP-37(2): 204-216
8. Al-kindi MJ, Dunlop D. Improved adaptive noise cancellation in the presence of signal leakage on the noise reference channel. Sig Process 1989; 17: 241-250
9. Weinstein E, Oppenheim AV, Feder M, Buck JR. Iterative and sequential algorithms for multisensor signal enhancement. IEEE Trans Sig Process 1994; 42(3): 846-859
10. Mumolo E, Romanin M. New speech separation algorithms. In: Holt M, Cowan C, Grant P, Sandham W (eds). Signal processing VII: theories and applications, EUSIPCO-94, Edinburgh, UK, September 1994, pp 1693-1696
11. Quartieri T, Danisewicz R. An approach to co-channel talker interference suppresion using a sinusoidal model for speech. In: Proceedings of ICASSP-88, New York, USA, April 1988, pp 565-568
12. Nguyen Thi HL. Séparation aveugle de sources à large bande dans un mélange convolutif. PhD thesis, INP Grenoble, France, 1993
13. Van Gerven S, Van Compernolle D. Feedforward and feedback in a symmetric adaptive noise canceller: stability analysis in a simplified case. In: Vandewalle J, Boite R, Moonen M and Oosterlinck A, (eds). Signal processing VI: Theories and applications, Proceedings of Eusipco 92, Brussels, Belgium, August 1992, Elsevier, pp 1081-1084
14. Nguyen Thi HL, Jutten C. Blind source separation for convolutive mixtures. Sig Process 1995; 45(2): 209-229
15. Van Gerven S, Van Compemolle D. Signal separation in a symmetric adaptive decorrelation: stability, convergence and uniqueness. IEEE Trans Sig Process 1995
16. Yellin D, Weinstein E. Criteria for multichannel signal separation. IEEE Trans Sig Process 1994; 42(8): 2158-2168
17. Najar M, Lagunas MA, Bonet I. Blind wideband source separation. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICASSP, Adelaide, Australia, May 1994, vol IV, pp 65-68
18. Nguyen Thi HL, Jutten C., Caelen J. Speech enhancement: analysis and comparison of methods in various real situations. In: Vandewalle J, Boite R, Moonen M, Oosterlinck A (eds). Signal processing VI: Theories and applications, Proceedings of Eusipco 92, Brussels, Belgium, August 1992, Elsevier, pp 303-306
19. Allen JB, Berkley DA. Image Method for efficiently simulating small-room acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 65(4) 943-950
20. Mboup M, Bonnet M. On the adequateness of IIR adaptive filtering for acoustic echo cancellation. In: Vandewalle J, Boite R, Moonen M, Oosterlinck A, eds, Signal processing VI: Theories and applications. Proceedings of Eusipco 92, Brussels, Belgium, August 1992, Elsevier, Amsterdam, London, New York, Tokyo, pp. 111-114
21. Ljung J. System identification: theory for the user. PTR Prentice Halle Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1987
22. Nguyen Thi HL, Van Gerven S, Jutten C, Van Compernolle D. Stability study for source separation in convolutive mixtures. Sig Process, (Submitted in Feb. 1995)
23. Nikias CL, Mendel JM. Signal processing with higherorder spectra. IEEE Sig Process Mag 1993; 10(3): 10-37
24. Rabiner LR, Cheng MJ, Rosenberg AE, McGonegal CA. A comparative performance study of several pitch detection algorithms. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 1976; ASSP 24(5): 399-418
25. Boite R, Kunt M. Traitement de la parole. Presses Polytechniques Romandes 1987
26. Nguyen Thi HL, Jutten C. Whitening for blind separation of sources. In: Proceedings of 3rd workshop ATHOS, ESPRIT on higher order statistics in signal processing, Edinburgh, UK, September 1994
27. Barbier L, Chollet G. Robust speech parameters extraction for word recognition in noise using neural networks. In: Proceedings of ICASSP, 1991, pp 145-148
28. Blanchet M, Boudy J, Lockwood P. Environment adaptation for speech recognition in noise. In: Vandewalle J, Boite R, Moonen M and Oosterlinck A (editors). Signal processing VI: Theories and applications, Proceedings of Eusipco 92, Brussels, Belgium, August 1992, Elsevier, pp 391-394
29. Trompf M, Eckhardt H, Mekhaiel M. An environmentadaptive noise reduction neural network for reliable speech recognition. In: Holt M, Cowan C, Grant P, Sandham W (eds). Signal processing VII: Theories and applications, EUSIPCO-94, Edinburgh, UK, September 1994, pp 1202-1205
30. Kabré H. Réseaux connnexionistes et reconnaissance automatique de la parole. Rapport interne de l'Institut' de la Communication Parlée, 1994
31. Hermansky H. Perceptual linear predictive (PLP) analysis of speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87(4): 1738-1752