13C NMR investigation of carbon nanotubes and derivatives

Current Applied Physics

Volumn 1, Issue 2-3, 2001, Pages 149-155

  Goze Bac, C ^a   Bernier, P ^a   Latil, S ^a   Jourdain, V ^a   Rubio, A ^b   Jhang, S H ^c   Lee, S W ^c   Park, Y W ^c   Holzinger, M ^d   Hirsch, A ^d  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

61.48.+c; 76.60.Es; 13C NMR; Carbon nanotube; Chemical shift; T1 relaxation time

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012394553     PISSN: 15671739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1567-1739(01)00009-8     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Liu J.et al. Science. 280:1998;1253.
2. Chen J.et al. Science. 282:1998;95.
3. Hamon M.et al. Adv. Mater. 11:1999;834.
4. Kuznetsova A.et al. Chem. Phys. Lett. 321:2000;292.
5. M. Holzinger et al., in: Proceedings of IWEPN, Kirhcberg, 2000.
6. Goze Bac C.et al. Phys. Rev. B. 63:2001;100302.
7. Latil S.et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86:2001;3160.
8. Kwon Y.K., Tomanek D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:2000;1483.
9. Tang X.P., Kleinhammes A., Shimoda H., Fleming L., Bennoune K.Y., Sinha S., Bower C., Zhou O., Wu Y. Science. 288:2000;492.
10. Pople J. J. Chem. Phys. 37:1962;53.
11. Pasquarello A., Sclüter M., Haddon R.C. Phys. Rev. A. 47:1993;1783.
12. Rols S.et al. Eur. Phys. J. 10:1999;263.
13. For the present work this approximation is reasonable. However, a more refined first-principle approach would be required to include the effects of impurities, chemical functionalization and doping in nanotubes. See Mauri F.et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79:1997;2340. and references therein for the method applied to carbon materials.
14. Mintmire J., White C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80:1998;2506.
15. L. Salem, The Molecular Orbital Theory of Conjugated Systems, Benjamin, Reading, 1966, pp. 189-223 (a discussion about the physical meaning of the London transformation is written in Chapter 4).