Using analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy set theory to rate and rank the disability

Fuzzy Sets and Systems

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 1-22

  Chen, Jacob Jen Gwo ^a   He, Zesheng ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Decision making; Disability; Membership functions; Multicriteria analysis; Rehabilitation; Vocational assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012353596     PISSN: 01650114     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00037-1     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. M.S. Baas and H. Kwakernaak, Rating and ranking of multiple-aspects alternatives using fuzzy sets, Automatica 13 (1977) 47-58.
2. R.L. Becker, AAMD BECKER Interest Inventory (American Association on Mental Deficiency, Washington, DC, 1982).
3. R.E. Bellman and L.A. Zadeh, Decision-making in a fuzzy environment, Management Sci. 17 (1970) B141-B164.
4. J.H. Birdsong, MTM and rehabilitation: a combination for potential profits, J. Methods - Time Measurement 17 (1972) 3-8.
5. K.F. Botterbusch, Vocational Assessment and Evaluation Systems: a Comparison (Materials Development Center, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI, 1987).
6. D.S. Brown, Quality through equality: using TQM to hire and retain workers with disability, Indust. Engineering 25 (1993) 60-62.
7. J.J. Buckley, Fuzzy hierarchical analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17 (1985) 233-247.
8. J.G. Chen, Development of vision impaired task and assignment lexicon via an ergonomics and expert system approach, Internat. J. Indust. Ergonomics 10 (1992) 225-240.