Environmental Sociology: A Personal Perspective on Its First Quarter Century

Organization and Environment

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 10-29

  Dunlap, Riley E ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012353119     PISSN: 10860266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1086026602151002     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Been, V. (1994). Locally undesirable land uses in minority neighborhoods: Disproportionate siting or market dynamics? Yale Law Journal, 103, 1383-1422.
2. Benton, T. (1989). Marxism and natural limits. New Left Review, 178, 51-86.
3. Burch, W. R., Jr. (1971). Daydreams and nightmares: A sociological essay on the American environment. New York: Harper & Row.
4. Burch, W. R., Jr. (1976). The peregrine falcon and the urban poor: Some sociological interrelations. In P. J. Richerson & J. McEvoy III (Eds.), Human ecology: An environmental approach (pp. 308-316). North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
5. Burningham, K., & Cooper, G. (1999). Being constructive: Social constructionism and the environment. Sociology, 33, 297-316.
6. Buttel, F. H. (1976). Social science and the environment: Competing theories. Social Science Quarterly, 57, 307-323.
7. Buttel, F. H. (1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm? The American Sociologist, 13, 252-256.
8. Buttel, F. H. (1986). Sociology and the environment: The winding road toward human ecology. International Social Science Journal, 109, 337-356.
9. Buttel, F. H. (1987). New directions in environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 465-488.
10. Buttel, F. H. (1996). Environmental and resource sociology: Theoretical issues and opportunities for synthesis. Rural Sociology, 61, 56-76.
11. Buttel, F. H. (2000). Classical theory and contemporary environmental sociology. In G. Spaargaren, A.P.J. Mol, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Environment and global modernity (pp. 17-39). London: Sage.
12. Buttel, F. H. (2001, August). Has environmental sociology arrived? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Anaheim, CA.
13. Catton, W. R., Jr. (1980). Overshoot: The ecological basis of revolutionary change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
14. Catton, W. R., Jr., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978a). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm. The American Sociologist, 13, 41-49.
15. Catton, W. R., Jr., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978b). Paradigms, theories, and the primacy of the HEP-NEP distinction. The American Sociologist, 13, 256-259.
16. Catton, W. R., Jr., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24, 15-47.
17. Choldin, H. M. (1978). Social life and the physical environment. In D. Street (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary urban life (pp. 352-384). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Dickens, P. (1992). Society and nature: Towards a green social theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
19. Dunlap, R. E. (1997). The evolution of environmental sociology. In M. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), The international handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 21-39). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
20. Dunlap, R. E. (2001, Winter). A brief history of the Environment and Technology Section. Environment, Technology and Society 100(1), 4-5.
21. Dunlap, R. E. (2002). Paradigms, theories, and environmental sociology. In R. E. Dunlap, F. H. Buttel, P. Dickens, & A. Gijswijt (Eds.), Sociological theory and the environment (pp. 329-350). Boulder, CO: Rowman-Littlefield.
22. Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R., Jr. (1979a). Environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 5, 243-73.
23. Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R., Jr. (1979b). Environmental sociology: A framework for anal-ysis. In T. O'Riordan & R. C. d' Arge (Eds.), Progress in resource management and envi-ronmental planning (Vol. 1, pp. 57-85). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
24. Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R., Jr. ( 1983). What environmental sociologists have in common (whether concerned with 'built' or 'natural' environments). Sociological Inquiry, 53, 113-135.
25. Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R., Jr. (1994). Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology. The American Sociologist, 25, 5-30.
26. Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R., Jr. (in press). Which functions of the environment do we study? A comparison of environmental and natural resource sociology. Society and Natural Resources.
27. Dunlap, R. E., & Gale, R. P. (1972). Politics and ecology: A political profile of student ecoactivists. Youth and Society, 3, 379-397.
28. Dunlap, R. E., & Gale, R. P. (1974). Party membership and environmental politics: A legislative roll-call analysis. Social Science Quarterly, 55, 670-690.
29. Dunlap, R. E., & Martin, K. E. (1983). Bringing environment into the study of agriculture. Rural Sociology, 48, 201-218.
30. Dunlap, R. E., & Michelson, W. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of environmental sociology. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
31. Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The "new environmental paradigm": A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
32. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
33. Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1997). Society's metabolism. In M. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), The international handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 119-137). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
34. Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx's theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 366-405.
35. Franck, K. A. (1984). Exorcising the ghost of physical determinism. Environment and Behavior, 16, 411-435.
36. Frank, D. J., Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E. (2000). The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 65, 96-116.
37. Freudenburg, W. R., & Gramling, R. (1993). Socioenvironmental factors and development policy: Understanding opposition and support for offshore oil development. Sociological Forum, 8, 341-364.
38. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
39. Goldblatt, D. (1996). Social theory and the environment. Boulder. CO: Westview.
40. Goldman, M., & Schurman, R. A. (2000). Closing the "great divide": New social theory on society and nature. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 563-584.
41. Gramling, R., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Environmental sociology: Toward a paradigm for the 21st century. Sociological Spectrum, 16, 347-370.
42. Grundmann, R. (1991). Marxism and Ecology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43. Hannigan, J. A. (1995). Environmental sociology: A social constructionist perspective. London: Routledge.
44. Harper, C. L. (1996). Environment and society: Human perspectives on environmental issues. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45. Humphrey, C. R., Lewis, T. L., & Buttel, F. H. (2002). Environment, energy, and society: A new synthesis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
46. Irwin, A. (2001). Sociology and the environment. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
47. Klausner, S. Z. (1971). On man in his environment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
48. Kroll-Smith, S., Gunter, V., & Laska, S. (2000). Theoretical stances and environmental debates: Reconciling the physical and the symbolic. The American Sociologist, 31, 44-61.
49. Kroll-Smith, S., & Laska, S. (1994, Winter). The GEC debate: Notes on theorizing and researching the environment. Environment, Technology, and Society, 74, 1-3.
50. Lash, S., Szerszynski, B., & Wynne, B. (Eds.). (1996). Risk, environment & modernity: Towards a new ecology. London: Sage.
51. Lidskog, R. (1996). Introduction to this special issue on sociology and the environment. Acta Sociologica, 39, 3-4.
52. Macnaghten, P., & Urry, J. (1998). Contested natures. London: Sage.
53. Martell, L. (1994). Ecology and society. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
54. Mehta, M. D., & Ouellet, E. (Eds.). (1995). Environmental sociology: Theory and practice. North York, Canada: Captus.
55. Mol, A.P.J., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernization theory in debate: A review. Environmental Politics, 9, 17-49.
56. Murdoch, J. (2001). Ecologising sociology: Actor-network theory, co-construction and the problem of human exemptionalism. Sociology, 35, 111-133.
57. Murphy, R. (1994). Rationality & nature. Boulder, CO: Westview.
58. Norgaard, R. B. (1997). A coevolutionary environmental sociology. In M. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), International handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 158-168). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
59. O'Connor, J. (1998). Natural causes: Essays in ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford.
60. Redclift, M., & Woodgate, G. (1994). Sociology and the environment: Discordant discourse? In M. Redclift and T. Benton (Eds.), Social theory and the global environment (pp. 51-66). London: Routledge.
61. Redclift, M., & Woodgate, G. (Eds.). (1997). The international handbook of environmental sociology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
62. Ritzer, G. (1975). Sociology: A multiple paradigm science. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
63. Roberts, J. T., & Grimes, P. E., (1999). Extending the world-system to the whole system: Toward a political economy of the biosphere. In W. L. Goldfrank, D. Goodman, & A. Szasz (Eds.), Ecology and the world system (pp. 59-83). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
64. Rosa, E. A. (1998). Metatheoretial foundations for post-normal risk. Journal of Risk Research, 1, 15-44.
65. Rudel, T. K., & Roper, J. (1997). The paths to rain forest destruction: Crossnational patterns of tropical deforestation, 1975-90. World Development, 25, 53-65.
66. Schnaiberg, A. (1973). Politics, participation and pollution: The "environmental movement." In J. Walton and D. E. Cams (Eds.), Cities in change (pp. 605-627). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
67. Schnaiberg, A. (1975). Social syntheses of the societal-environmental dialectic: The role of distributional impacts. Social Science Quarterly, 56, 5-20.
68. Spaargaren, G., & Mol, A.P.J. (1992). Sociology, environment, and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Society and Natural Resources, 5, 323-344.
69. Tindall, D. B. (1995). What is environmental sociology? In M. D. Mehta & E. Ouellet (Eds.), Environmental sociology: Theory and practice (pp. 33-59). North York, Canada: Captus.
70. Weigert, A. J. (1997). Self, interaction, and the natural environment: Refocusing our eyesight. Albany: State University of New York Press.
71. Woodgate, G., & Redclift, M. (1998). From a "sociology of nature" to environmental sociology: Beyond social construction. Environmental Values, 7, 3-24.
72. Yearley, S. (1991). The green case. London: HarperCollins.