Validity of the Kaufman brief intelligence test and a four-subtest WISC-III short form with adolescent offenders

Assessment

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 385-394

  Thompson, Anthony ^a,c   Browne, Janet ^a   Schmidt, Fred ^b   Boer, Marian ^b  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Lakehead Regional Family Centre   (Canada)

^c CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012218821     PISSN: 10731911     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107319119700400409     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Canivez, G. L. (1995). Validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test: Comparisons with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. Assessment, 2, 101-111.
2. Donders, J. (1995). Validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) in children with traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 2, 219-224.
3. Dumont, R., & Faro, C. (1993). A WISC-III short form for learning disabled students. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 212-219.
4. Kaufman, A. S. (1990). Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman, J. C., Balgopal, R., & McLean, J. E. (1996). Comparison of three WISC-III short forms: Weighing psychometric, clinical, and practical factors. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25, 97-105.
6. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1990). Manual for the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
7. Levinson, E. M., & Folino, L. (1994a). Correlations of scores on the Gifted Evaluation Scale with those on WISC-III and Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test for students referred for gifted evaluation. Psychological Reports, 74, 419-424.
8. Levinson, E. M., & Folino, L. (1994b). The relationship between the WISC-III and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test with students referred for gifted education. Special Services in the Schools, 8, 155-159.
9. Moon, G. W., Blakey, W. A., Gorsuch, R. L., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (1991). Frequent WAIS-R administration errors: An ignored source of inaccurate measurement. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22, 256-258.
10. Naugle, R. I., Chelune, G. J., & Tucker, G. D. (1993). Validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Psychological Assessment, 5, 182-186.
11. Prewett, P. N. (1992a). The relationship between the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) and the WISC-R with incarcerated juvenile delinquents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 977-982.
12. Prewett, P. N. (1992b). The relationship between the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) and the WISC-R with referred students. Psychology in the Schools, 29, 25-27.
13. Prewett, P. N. (1995). A comparison of two screening tests (the Matrix Analogies Test-Short Form and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test) with the WISC-III. Psychological Assessment, 7, 69-72.
14. Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Author.
15. Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of children: WISC-III and WPPSI-R supplement. San Diego, CA: Author.
16. Silverstein, A. B. (1985). An appraisal of three criteria for evaluating the usefulness of WAIS-R short forms. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 676-680.
17. Silverstein, A. B. (1989). Agreement between a short form and the full scale as a function of the correlation between them. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 929-931.
18. Silverstein, A. B. (1990). Short forms of individual intelligence tests. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 3-11.
19. Thompson, A. P. (1987). Methodological issues in the clinical evaluation of two-and four-subtest short forms of the WAIS-R. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 142-143.
20. Thompson, A. P. (1995). Test-retest evaluation of a four-subtest WAIS-R short form with young offenders. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 410-414.
21. Thompson, A. P., & Hodgins, C. (1994). Evaluation of a checking procedure for reducing clerical and computational errors on the WAIS-R. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 26, 492-504.
22. Thompson, A. P., Howard, D., & Anderson, J. (1986). Two- and four-subtest short forms of the WAIS-R: Validity in a psychiatric sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 18, 287-293.
23. Thompson, A. P., & LoBello, S. G. (1994). Reliable and abnormal scaled score range estimates for common Wechsler selected subtest short forms. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 264-269.
24. Watkins, C. E., Jr. (1986). Validity and usefulness of WAIS-R, WISC-R, and WPPSI short forms: A critical review. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 36-43.
25. Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Weclisler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
26. Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
27. Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.