White noise analysis of coupled linear-nonlinear systems

SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1208-1230

  Nykamp, Duane Q ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Correlations; Neural networks; Weiner analysis; White noise

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; INTEGRATION; NEURAL NETWORKS; WHITE NOISE;

WEINER ANALYSIS;

NONLINEAR SYSTEMS;

EID: 0012212303     PISSN: 00361399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/S0036139901397571     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Y. DAN, J.-M. ALONSO, W. M. USREY, AND R. C. REID, Coding of visual information by precisely correlated spikes in the lateral geniculate nucleus, Nature Neurosci., 1 (1998), pp. 501-507.
2. G. C. DEANGELIS, I. OHZAWA, AND R. D. FREEMAN, Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development, J. Neurophysiol., 69 (1993), pp. 1091-1117.
3. G. C. DEANGELIS, I. OHZAWA, AND R. D. FREEMAN, Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation, J. Neurophysiol., 69 (1993), pp. 1118-1135.
4. E. DEBOER AND P. KUYPER, Triggered correlation, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 15 (1968), pp. 169-179.
5. R. C. DECHARMS, D. T. BLAKE, AND M. M. MERZENICH, Optimizing sound features for cortical neurons, Science, 280 (1998), pp. 1439-1443.
6. J. J. DICARLO AND K. O. JOHNSON, Velocity invariance of receptive field structure in somatosensory cortical area 3b of the alert monkey, J. Neurosci., 19 (1999), pp. 401-419.
7. J. J. DICARLO, K. O. JOHNSON, AND S. S. HSIAO, Structure of receptive fields in area 3b of primary somatosensory cortex in the alert monkey, J. Neurosci., 18 (1998), pp. 2626-2645.
8. R. L. JENISON, J. W. H. SCHNUPP, R. A. REALE, AND J. F. BRUGGE, Auditory space-time receptive field dynamics revealed by spherical white-noise analysis, J. Neurosci., 21 (2001), pp. 4408-4415.
9. J. P. JONES AND L. A. PALMER, An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex, J. Neurophysiol., 58 (1987), pp. 1233-1258.
10. S. MARCELJA, Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells, J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 70 (1980), pp. 1297-1300.
11. P. N. MARMARELIS AND V. Z. MARMARELIS, Analysis of Physiological Systems: The White Noise Approach, Plenum Press, New York, 1978.
12. D. Q. NYKAMP, Spike correlation measures that eliminate stimulus effects in response to white noise, J. Comp. Neurosci., 14 (2003), pp. 193-209.
13. D. Q. NYKAMP AND D. L, RINGACH, Full identification of a linear-nonlinear system via cross-correlation analysis, J. Vision, 2 (2002), pp. 1-11.
14. G. PALM, A. M. H. J. AERTSEN, AND G. L. GERSTEIN, On the significance of correlations among neuronal spike trains, Biol. Cybern., 59 (1988), pp. 1-11.
15. R. C. REID AND J. M. ALONSO, Specificity of monosynaptic connections from thalamus to visual cortex, Nature, 378 (1995), pp. 281-284.
16. R. C. REID, J. D. VICTOR, AND R. M. SHAPLEY, The use of m-sequences in the analysis of visual neurons: Linear receptive field properties, Vis. Neurosci., 14 (1997), pp. 1015-1027.
17. D. L. RINGACH, personal communication.
18. D. L. RINGACH, M. J. HAWKEN, AND R. SHAPLEY, Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque primary visual cortex, Nature, 387 (1997), pp. 281-284.
19. W. M. USREY, J.-M. ALONSO, AND R. C. REID, Synaptic interactions between thalamic inputs to simple cells in cat visual cortex, J. Neurosci., 20 (2000), pp. 5461-5467.