Spatial frequency and interference between global and local levels of structure

Visual Cognition

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 193-220

  Lamb, Marvin R ^a,b   Yund, E William ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012177094     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713756739     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alwit, L.F. (1982). Two neural mechanisms related to models of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 253-272.
2. Badcock, J.C., Whitworth, FA., Badcock, D.R., & Lovegrove, W.J. (1990). Low-frequency filtering and the processing of local-global stimuli. Perception , 19, 617-629.
3. Breitmeyer, B.G. (1975). Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels. Visual Research, 15, 1411-1412.
4. Breitmeyer, B.G., & Ganz, L. (1976). Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review, 83, 1-36.
5. Christman, S., Kitterle, F.L., & Hellige, J. (1991). Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of absolute versus relative spatial frequency. Brain and Cognition, 16, 62-73.
6. De Valois, K.K. (1977). Spatial frequency adaptation can enhance contrast sensitivity. Vision Research, 17, 1057-1065.
7. Doyon, J., & Milner, B. (1991). Right temporal-lobe contribution to global visual processing. Neuropsychologia, 29, 343-360.
8. Efron, R. (1990). The decline and fall of hemispheric specialization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Harwerth, R.S., & Levi, D.M. (1978). Reaction time as a measure of suprathreshold grating detection. Vision Research, 18, 1579-1586.
10. Heinze, H.J., & Munte, T.F. (1993). Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical stimulus processing: Dissociation between onset and later stages of global and local target processing. Neuropsychologia, 31, 841-852.
11. Hellige, J.B. (1993). Hemispheric asymmetry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Hughes, H.C. (1986). Asymmetric interference between components of suprathreshold compound gratings. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 241-250.
13. Hughes, H.C., Fendrich, R., & Reuter-Lorenz, PA. (1990). Global versus local processing in the absence of low spatial frequencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 272-282.
14. Humphreys, G.W., Riddoch, J., & Quinlan, T.T. (1985). Interactive processes in perceptual organization: Evidence from visual agnosia. In M.I. Posner & O.S. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Kitterle, F.L., & Christman, S. (1991). Hemispheric symmetries and asymmetries in processing sinewave gratings. In F.L. Kitterle (Ed.), Cerebral laterality: Theory and research, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Kitterle, F.L., Christman, S., & Conesa, J. (1993). Hemispheric differences in the interference among components of compound gratings. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 785-793.
17. Kitterle, F.L., Christman, S, & Hellige, J. (1990). Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 297-306.
18. Kitterle, F.L., Hellige, J.B., & Christman, S. (1992). Visual hemispheric asymmetries depend on which spatial frequencies are task relevant. Brain and Cognition, 20, 308-314.
19. Kitterle, F.L., & Selig, L.M. (1991). Visual field effects in the discrimination of sine-wave gratings. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 15-18.
20. LaGasse, L. (1993). Effects of good form and spatial frequency on global precedence. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 785-793.
21. Lamb, M.R., & Robertson, L.C. (1988). The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 172-181.
22. Lamb, M.R., & Robertson, L.C. (1989). Do response time advantage and interference reflect the order of processing of global and local level information? Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 254-258.
23. Lamb, M.R., Robertson, L.C., & Knight, R.T. (1989). Attention and interference in the processing of global and local information: Effects of unilateral temporal-parietal junction lesions. Neuropsychologia, 27, 471-483.
24. Lamb, M.R., Robertson, L.C., & Knight, R.T. (1990). Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: Inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 471-483.
25. Lamb, M.R., & Yund, E.W. (1993). The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized structure. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 773-784.
26. Lovegrove, W.J., Lehmkuhle, S., Baro, J.A., & Garzia, R. (1991). The effect of uniform field flicker and blurring on the global precedence effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 289-291.
27. Lovegrove, W.J., & Pepper, K. (1994). The influence of low-level processing in the global precedence effect. In S. Ballesteros (Ed.), Cognitive approaches to human perception (pp. 71-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28. Lupp, U., Hauske, G., & Wolf, W. (1976). Perceptual latencies to sinusoidal gratings. Vision Research, 16, 969-972.
29. Martin, M. (1979). Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing. Neuropsychologia, 17, 33-40.
30. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
31. Navon, D. (1991). Testing a queue hypothesis for the processing of global and local information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 173-189.
32. Navon, D., & Norman J. (1983). Does global precedence really depend on visual angle? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 955-965.
33. Paquet, L. (1992). Global and local processing in nonattended objects: A failure to induce local processing dominance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 512-529.
34. Robertson, L.C., & Lamb, M.R. (1991). Neuropsychological perspectives on theories of part/whole organization. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 299-330.
35. Robertson, L.C., Lamb, M.R., & Knight, R.T. (1988). Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 3757-3769.
36. Robertson, L.C., Lamb, M.R., & Zaidel, E. (1993). Interhemispheric relations in processing hierarchical patterns: Evidence from normal and commissurotomized subjects. Neuropsychology, 7, 325-342.
37. Sergent, J. (1982). The cerebral balance of power: Confrontation or cooperation? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 252-272.
38. Singer, W., & Bedworth, N. (1973). Inhibitory interactions between X and Y units in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Brain Research, 49, 291-307.
39. Tolhurst, D.J. (1972). Adaptation to square-wave gratings: Inhibition between spatial frequency channels in the human visual system. Journal of Physiology, 226, 231-249.
40. Van Kleek, M.H. (1989). Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous data. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1165-1178.
41. Watson, A.B., & Nachmias, J. (1977). Patterns of temporal interaction in the detection of gratings. Vision Research, 17, 893-902.