Nonlinear redundancy analysis and canonical correspondence analysis based on polynomial regression

Ecology

Volumn 83, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 1146-1161

  Makarenkov, Vladimir ^a,b   Legendre, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b TRAPEZNIKOV INSTITUTE OF CONTROL SCIENCES   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Canonical correspondence analysis; Multiple linear regression; Nonlinear canonical analysis; Permutation test; Polynomial regression; Redundancy analysis

Indexed keywords

CANONICAL ANALYSIS; NONLINEARITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0012173648     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1146:NRAACC]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Donovan, C. 1998. Optimal transformations in multivariate analysis of trawl data. Thesis. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
2. Durand, J. F. 1993. Generalized principal component analysis with respect to instrumental variables via univariate spline transformations. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 16:423-440.
3. Gabriel, K. R. 1982. Biplot. Pages 263-271 in S. Kotz and N. L. Johnson, editors. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Volume 1. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
4. Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology. Second English edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
5. Økland, R. H. 1999. On the variation explained by ordination and constrained ordination axes. Journal of Vegetation Science 10:131-136.
6. Rao, C. R. 1964. The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhyaá A 26:329-358.
7. Rao, C. R. 1973. Linear statistical inference and its applications. Second edition. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
8. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1176-1179.
9. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1987a. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69:69-77.
10. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1987b. Ordination. Pages 91-173 in R. H. G. Jongman, C. J. F. ter Braak, and O. F. R. van Tongeren, editors. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. (Reissued in 1995 by Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.) Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
11. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1988a. CANOCO: an extension of DECORANA to analyze species-environment relationships. Vegetatio 75:159-160.
12. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1988b. CANOCO: a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal component analysis and redundancy analysis. Version 2.1. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
13. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1990. Update notes: CANOCO version 3.10. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
14. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1994. Canonical community ordination. Part I: basic theory and linear methods. Écoscience 1:127-140.
15. ter Braak, C. J. F., and P. Smilauer. 1998. CANOCO reference manual and user's guide to CANOCO for Windows: software for canonical community ordination. Version 4. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, USA.
16. van der Aart, P. J. M., and N. Smeenk-Enserink. 1975. Correlations between distributions of hunting spiders (Lycosidae, Ctenidae) and environmental characteristics in a dune area. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 25:1-45.
17. van der Burg, E., and J. de Leeuw. 1983. Non-linear canonical correlation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 36:54-80.