Hypercompetition on horticultural markets

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 536, Issue , 2000, Pages 485-492

  Axelson, Lena Ekelund ^a   Axelson, Johan ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Competitive advantage; Hypercompetition; Strategy; Tomatoes

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 0012128495     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.536.58     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Ahlgren, M., Jansson,T. 1998. Lokalproduktionen av trädgå rdsprodukter i Sverige, Report, Horticultural Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU),Alnarp, Sweden (unpubl.)
2. D'Aveni, R. A., 1994. Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvring. The Free Press, New York, USA.
3. Ekelund Axelson, L. 1991. Structural Changes in the Swedish Marketing of Vegetables, Lund Economic Studies, Sweden.
4. Ekelund Axelson, L., 1996a. The Impact of the EU Membership on Swedish Horticulture. Proceedings NFJ-seminar264:Integration of Agriculture and Food Industries of the New Member Countries in the EU. Alnarp, Sweden, pp. 121-139
5. Ekelund Axelson, L., 1996b. Demand and Supply Factors on the Market for Organic Vegetables: the Case of Sweden. Proceedings XIII International Symposium On Horticultural Economics. Acta Horticulturae, vol. 429, pp. 367-375.
6. th EAAE Seminar, Understanding Competitiveness, EAAE / ISHS, Apeldoorn, Netherlands
7. Ekelund Axelson. L & Nilsson, C-H, 2000. Transportförpackningar i dagligvaruhandeln, KunskapsPartner, 2000:01, IDEON, S-223 54 Lund, Sweden
8. Göransson, C.,1998. Scenarier för trädgå rdsbranschen, Examensarbete 1998:8, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Alnarp, Sweden
9. Jansson, T., 1999. Apples in Four Perspectives, A Case Study of the New Zealand Apple Industry, Examensarbete 1999:3, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Alnarp, Sweden
10. Jönsson, L. 2000.Transportemballage för frukt och grönsaker, Examensarbete, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Alnarp (under publication)
11. Porter, M. E., 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press, New York, USA.
12. Porter, M., 1991. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp. 95-118.
13. SCB, Statistical Bureau of Sweden, 1991-2000. Trädgå rdsinventeringen/Trädgårds-räkningen 1991, 1994 and 1997, Utrikeshandel 1990-1999. Statistiska meddelanden, Örebro, Sweden (http://www.scb.se)
14. Swedish Board of Agriculture ( Statens jordbruksverk), 1999. Livsmedelskonsumtionen, Jönköping (http://www.sjv.se)
15. Taragola, N., Van Lierde, D. 2000. Competitive Strategies In the Sector of Greenhouse Tomato Production in Belgium Proceedings XXV International Horticultural Congress. Acta Horticulturae, vol. 524, Part 14, Brussels, pp. 149-156
16. Wandel, S., 2000. Nolltaxa säkraste sättet att få bron att betala sig. Press-release, 2000- 03-08. Lund Institute of Technology, http://www.tlog.lth.se/sten.html. Lund University, Lund, Sweden
17. Wedelsbäck Bladh K. 1998. Växthusodlare i enkät. Fakta Trädgård Nr 4 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden