Intelligibility of dysarthric speech in words and sentences: Development of a computerised assessment procedure in Swedish

Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 107-119

  Lillvik, Malin ^a,b   Allemark, Eva ^a   Karlström, Petter ^a   Hartelius, Lena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Assessment; Communication disorder; Dysarthria; Intelligibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012097461     PISSN: 14015439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/140154399435057     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Beukelman DR, Yorkston KM. The influence of passage familiarity on intelligibility estimates of dysarthric speech. J Commun Disord 1980; 13: 33-41.
2. Carter CR, Yorkston KM, Strand EA, Hammen VL. Effects of semantic and syntactic context on actual and estimated sentence intelligibility of dysarthric speakers. In: Robin DA, Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, editors. Disorders of motor speech: assessment, treatment, and clinical characterization. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co, 1996.
3. Elert CC. Allmän och svensk fonetik. Stockholm: Norstedts förlag AB, 1989.
4. Enderby PM. Frenchay dysarthria assessment. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press, 1983.
5. Hammen VL, Yorkston KM, Dowden P. Index of contextual intelligibility. In: Moore CA, Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, editors. Dysarthria and apraxia of speech. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co, 1991.
6. Hartelius L, Svensson P. Dysartritest. Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget, 1990.
7. Kent RD. Intelligibility in speech disorders: theory, measurement, and management. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co, 1992.
8. Kent RD, Kent JF, Weismer G, et al. Impairment of speech intelligibility in men with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Speech Hear Disord 1990; 55: 721-8.
9. Kent RD, Weismer G, Kent JF, Rosenbek JC. Toward phonetic intelligibility testing in dysarthria. J Speech Hear Disord 1989; 54: 482-99.
10. Petersen EF. Phonetic intelligibility testing in dysarthria. Validity and reliability of listeners' perceptions. Log Phon Vocol 1997a; 22: 105-17.
11. Petersen EF. Test af Fonetisk Forståelighed. Valby, Denmark: INHAKO, 1997b.
12. Schiavetti N. Scaling procedures for the measurement of speech intelligibility. In: Kent RD, editor. Intelligibility in speech disorders: theory, measurement, and management. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co, 1992.
13. Tjaden KK, Liss JM. The role of listener familiarity in the perception of dysarthric speech. Clin Linguis Phonetics 1995; 9 (2): 130-54.
14. Weismer G, Martin RE. Acoustic and perceptual approaches to the study of intelligibility. In: Kent RD, editor. Intelligibility in speech disorders: theory, measurement, and management. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co, 1992.
15. Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR. A comparison of techniques for measuring intelligibility of dysarthric speech. J Commun Disord 1978; 11: 499-512.
16. Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR. A clinician-judged technique for quantifying dysarthric speech based on single word intelligibility. J Commun Disord 1980; 13: 15-31.
17. Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR. The influence of judge familiarization with the speaker on dysarthric speech intelligibility. In: Berry W, editor. Clinical dysarthria. Boston, MA: College-Hill Press, 1983.
18. Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR. Assessment of intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Tigard, Oregon: CC Publications, 1984.
19. Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, Bell KR. Clinical management of dysarthric speakers. Boston: College-Hill Press, 1988.
20. Yorkston KM, Strand EA, Kennedy MRT. Comprehensibility of dysarthric speech: Implications for assessment and treatment planning. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol 1996; 5: 55-66.
21. Ziegler W, Hartmann E, von Cramon D. Word identification testing in the diagnostic evaluation of dysarthric speech. Clin Linguis Phonetics 1988; 2 (4): 291-308.
22. Ziegler W, Hartmann E, Wiesner I. Dysarthriediagnostik mit dem "Münchner Verständlichkeits-Profil" (MVP) - Konstruktion des Verfahrens und Anwendungen. Nervenarzt 1992; 63: 602-8.