A comparative analysis of practitioners' errors on WISC-R and WISC-III

Canadian Journal of School Psychology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 35-43

  Klassen, Robert M ^a   Kishor, Nand ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012093631     PISSN: 08295735     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/082957359601200106     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
3. Bird, C.A. (1992). Examiner errors in scoring the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54/01.
4. Bradley, F., Hanna, G., & Lucas, M. (1980). The reliability of scoring the WISC-R. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 530-531.
5. Conner, R., & Woodall, F. (1983). The effects of experience and structured feedback on WISC-R error rates made by student- examiners. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 376-379.
6. Gilbert, T. (1992). Students' errors on the administration of the WAIS-R. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 8,126-130.
7. Hanna, G., Bradley, F., & Holen, M. (1981). Estimating major sources of measurement error in individual intelligences scales: Taking our heads out of the sand. Journal of Scluaol Psychology,19,370-376.-.
8. Levenson, R., Golden-Scaduto, C., Aiosa-Karpas, C., & Ward, A. (1988). Effects of examiners' education and sex on presence and type of clerical errors made on WISGR protocols. Psychological Reports, 62, 659-664.
9. Little, S. (1992). The WISC-III: Everything old is new again. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 148-154.
10. Miller, C., & Chansky, N., (1972). Psychologists' scoring of WISC protocols. Psychology in the Schools, 9,144-152.
11. Oakland, T., Lee, S., & Axelrad, K. (1975). Examiner differences on actual WISC protocols. Journal of School Psychology, 13, 227 233.
12. Rust, J., & Golambok, S. (1989). Modern psychometrics. The science of psyrhologicnI assessment. London: Routledge.-.
13. Ryan, J., Prifitera, A., & Powers, L. (1983). Scoring reliability on the WAIS-R. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 149-150.
14. Sherrets, S., Gard, G., & Langner, H. (1979). Frequency of clerical errors on WISC protocols. Psychology in the Schools, 16,495-496.
15. Slate, J., & Chick, R. (1989). WISC-R examiner errors: Cause for concern. Psychology in the Schools, 26, 78-83.
16. Slate, J., & Hunnicutt, L. (1988). Examiner errors on the Wechsler scales. Journal of Psycho-Educational Assessment, 6, 280-288.
17. Slate, J., & Jones, C. (1990a). Examiner errors on the WAIS-R: A source of concern. Journal of Psychology, 124, 343-345. '.
18. Slate, J., & Jones, C. (1990b). Identifying students' errors in administering the WAIS-R. Psychology in the Schools, 27; 83-87.
19. Slate, J., Jones, C., Coulter, C., & Covert, T. (1992). Practitioner's administration and scoring of the WISC-R: Evidence that we do err. jourrrai of School Psychology, 30, 77-82.
20. Stewart, K., (1987). Assessment of technical aspects of WISC-R administration. Psychology in the Schools, 24, 221-22$.
21. Wagoner, R. (1988). Scoring errors made by practicing psychologists on the WISC-R. Unpublished master's thesis, Western Carolina University.
22. Warren, S., & Brown, W. (1972). Examiner scoring errors on individual tests. Psychology in the Schools, 9,118-122.
23. Wechsler, D. (1974): Manuril for the Wechsler Intelligence Scnle for Childreii-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
24. Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.