Implementation issues for consumer-directed programs: A survey of policy experts

Generations

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 34-40

  Simon Rusinowitz, Lori ^a   Bochniak, Anne Marie ^b   Mahoney, Kevin J ^b   Marks, Lori N ^b   Hecht, Dunya ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011934356     PISSN: 07387806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Ansello, E., and Eustis, N. 1992. "A Common Stake? Investigating the Emerging Intersection of Aging and Disabilities." Generations 16: 5-8.
2. Baker, D., and Pallett-Hehn, P. 1995. "Care or Control: Barriers to Service Use by Elderly People." Journal of Applied Gerontology 14(3): 261-74.
3. Caplan, A. 1991. "The Values Baseline - A Solution to Enhancing the Autonomy of the Elderly?" In Kane, R., and King, C., eds., Assessing Values and Preferences in Long-Term Care: Is it Feasible and is it Desirable? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Long-Term Care Decisions Resource Center.
4. DeJung, G., Batavia, A., and McKnew, L. 1992. "The Independent Living Model of Personal Assistance in National Long-Term Care Policy?" Generations 16: 89-95.
5. Doty, P. 1997. Internal Briefing Paper Addressing Possible Fraud and Abuse Issues in the Cash Option. Unpublished report. Washington D.C.: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
6. Doty, P., Kasper, J., and Litvak, S. 1996. "Consumer-Directed Models of Personal Care: Lessons from Medicaid." Milbank Quarterly 74(3): 377-409.
7. Kapp, M. 1990. "Homecare Client-Centered Systems: Consumer Choice vs. Protection." Generations 14: 33-5.
8. Kapp, M. 1996. "Enhancing Autonomy and Choice in Selecting and Directing Long-Term Care Services." Elder Law Journal 4(1): 55-97.
9. Mahoney, C., Estes, C., and Heumann, J., eds. 1986. Toward a Unified Agenda: Proceedings of a National Conference on Disability and Aging. San Francisco: University of California and World Institute on Disability.
10. Simon-Rusinowitz, L., and Hofland, B. 1993. "Adopting a Disability Approach to Home Care Services for Older Adults." Gerontologist 33(2): 159-67.
11. Simon-Rusinowitz, L., et al. 1997. "Determining Consumer Preferences for a Cash Option: Arkansas Survey Results." Health Care Financing Review 19(2): 73-96.
12. Simon-Rusinowitz, L., et al. 1998. Determining Consumers' Preferences for a Cash Option: Background Research to Support the Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation. Synthesis of key telephone survey findings: Arkansas, New York, New Jersey, and Florida elders and adults with physical disabilities. Presentation at the 51st Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Philadelphia, Pa., November 24.
13. Simon-Rusinowitz, L., et al. In press, a. "The Status of a Common Agenda Between the Aging and Disability Communities: Where Has It Been? Where Is It Going? Views from Policy Experts." In Annual Review of Ethics, Law, and Aging. New York: Springer.
14. Simon-Rusinowitz, L., et al. In press, b. "Implementation Issues for Consumer-Directed Programs: Views from Policy Experts." Annual Review of Ethics, Law, and Aging. New York: Springer.
15. Zacharias, B. L. 19973. Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation. A Study to Determine the Preferences of Consumers and Surrogates for a Cash Option. Unpublished report on New York State Focus Groups. College Park: University of Maryland Center on Aging.
16. Zacharias, B. L. i997b. Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation. A study to determine the preferences of consumers and surrogates for a cash option. Unpublished report on Florida State Focus Groups. College Park: University of Maryland Center on Aging.