Political privacy and online politics: How E-campaigning threatens voter privacy

First Monday

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2002, Pages

  Hunter, Christopher D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011837236     PISSN: 13960466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5210/fm.v7i2.930     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Acxiom, 2001. "Acxiom executive outlines measures for using data to fight war on terrorism," Acxiom press release of 5 December, at http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/011205/52444_1.html, accessed 30 January 2002.
2. H. Arendt, 1998. The Human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Aristotle International, 2000. "SEC IPO filing," at http://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml, accessed 30 January 2002.
4. F. Bernstein, 2000. "An Online peek at your politics," New York Times (4 October), p. A35.
5. N. Bierman, 2000. "In smaller precincts, ballots can lose secrecy," Palm Beach (Fla>) Post (15 January), p. 1A.
6. E.J. Bloustein, 1984. "Privacy as an aspect of human dignity," In: Ferdinand David Schoeman (editor). Philosophical dimensions of privacy: an anthology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. L.D. Brandeis, 1914. Other people's money and how the bankers use it. New York: Frederick A. Stokes.
8. Brown v. Socialist Workers Campaign Committee (1982). 459 U.S. 87.
9. Buckley v. Valeo (1976). 424 U.S. 1.
10. Center for Democracy and Technology, 1999a. "A first test: The candidates and their privacy policies," at http://www.cdt.org/privacy/ campaign/2000/990902candidates.shtml, accessed 30 January 2002.
11. Center for Democracy and Technology, 1999b. "Square pegs & round holes: Applying campaign finance law to the Internet," at http://www.cdt.org/, accessed 30 January 2002.
12. A. Constantine, 1996. "What's in a name? McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission," Connecticut Law Review, volume 29, pp. 459-483.
13. Democracy Online Project, 2001. "Privacy concerns and its effects on Americans online," at http://democracyonline.org/pdf/2001SurveyAnalysis. pdf, accessed 30 January 2002.
14. Democratic National Committee, 2000. "Democrats become first political party to offer free Internet access for all," Press release, at http://www.nfdw.org/html/nfdw_internet.html, accessed 30 January 2002.
15. W. Diffie and S. Landau, 1998. Privacy on the line: The politics of wiretapping and encryption. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
16. J.B. Elshtain, 1997. "The Displacement of politics," In: Jeff Weintraub and Krishan Kumar (editors). Public and private in thought and practice: Perspectives on a grand dichotomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 166-181.
17. Enonymous, 2000. "Voters flood political Web sites - but is your privacy protected?" Press release of 1 March. at http://groups.yahoo.com/ group/e-lection/message/147, accessed 30 January 2002.
18. P. Fox, 2000. "You can be a contender," Computerworld (2 October), p. 44.
19. N. Fraser, 1992. "Rethinking the public sphere," In: Craig Calhoun (editor). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 109-143.
20. L.E. Fredman, 1968. The Australian ballot: The story of an American reform. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
21. O. Gandy, 2001. "Dividing practices: Segmentation and targeting in the emerging public sphere," In: W.L. Bennett and R.M. Entman (editors). Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 141-159.
22. S. Garfinkel, 2000. Database nation: The death of privacy in the 21st century. Sebastopol, Calif.: O'Reilly & Associates.
23. D. Gobetti, 1997. "Humankind as a system: Private and public agency and the origins of modern liberalism," In: Jeff Weintraub and Krishan Kumar (editors). Public and private in thought and practice: Perspectives on a grand dichotomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 103-132.
24. J. Habermas, 1989. The Structural transformation of the public sphere. Translated by Thomas Berger and Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
25. D. Held, 1987. Models of democracy. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
26. R.F. Hixson, 1987. Privacy in a public society: Human rights in conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. IBM Global Services, 1999. "IBM Multi-National Consumer Privacy Survey," at http://www.ibm.com/services/files/privacy_survey_oct991.pdf, accessed 30 January 2002.
28. Junkbusters, 1999. "How Web servers' cookies threaten your privacy," at http://www.junkbusters.com/cookies.html, accessed 30 January 2002.
29. E.C. Kamarck, 1999. "Campaigning on the internet in the elections of 1998," In: E.C. Kamarck and J.J.S. Nye (editors). democracy.com?: Governance in the network world. New York: Hollis, pp. 99-123.
30. J. Kang, 1998. "Information privacy in cyberspace transactions," Stanford Law Review, volume 50, number 4, pp. 1193-1294.
31. J. Knight, 2000. "Ode to a Grecian's earning," Washington Post (17 July), p. F07.
32. D. Kornfeld, 2000. "Use of the Internet for campaign activity," Response to Federal Election Commission Notice 1999-24, at http://www.epic.org/ free_speech/FEC_submission_1_4_2000.html.
33. B.Krebs, 2000. "Dems launch issue site with free Internet access," Newsbytes (8 June), at http://www.newsbytes.com/.
34. S.F. Kreimer, 1991. "Sunlight, secrets, and scarlet letters: The Tension between privacy and disclosure in constitutional law," University of Pennsylvania Law Review, volume 140, pp. 3-147.
35. L. Lessnor, 2000. "Some political Web sites gather and resell data on users' browsing habits," Knight Ridder News Service (14 April).
36. D. McCullagh, 2000. "Bradley campaign rents email lists to congressional candidates?" Politech Mailing List, at http://www. politechbot.com/p-01091.html;
37. see also http://www.politechbot.com/p-01097.html, accessed 30 January 2002.
38. McIntyre v. Ohio (1995). 514 U.S. 334.
39. J. Mintz and R. O'Harrow, 2000. "Software digs deep into lives of voters," Washington Post (10 October), p. A01.
40. H. Mortman, 2000. "Priva-see how they run," National Journal (14 April);
41. also at http://www.mindshare.net/news/archive/955990572.shtml, accessed 30 January 2002.
42. NAACP v. Alabama (1958). 357 U.S. 462.
43. C. Nuckols, 2000. "Before you go cast your vote, politicians know about you," The Virginian Pilot (5 December), p. A1.
44. S. Olsen, 2001. "Patriot Act draws privacy concerns," News.com (26 October), at http://news.com.com/2100-1023-275026.html, accessed 30 January 2002.
45. T. Peterson, 1990. "Rural life and the privacy of political association," Agricultural History, volume 64, number 3, pp. 1-8.
46. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2000. "Trust and privacy online," at http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=19, accessed 30 January 2002.
47. G.M. Pomper, 1968. Elections in America. New York: Dodd, Mead.
48. A. Pressman, 2000. "Voters for sale," Industry Standard (6 November), at http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,19864,00.html, accessed 30 January 2002.
49. R.D. Putnam, 2000. Bowling alone: The Collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
50. G.M. Regnery, 2000. "Make a campaign donation and the whole world knows," Bergen County Record (21 September), p. L7.
51. J. Reidenberg, 1999. "Restoring Americans' privacy in electronic commerce," Berkeley Technology Law Journal, volume 14, pp. 771-792.
52. J. Reiman, 1995. "Driving to the panopticon," Santa Clara Computer and High Tech Law Journal, volume 11,pp. 27-44.
53. Reno v. ACLU (1997). 521 U.S. 844.
54. M. Rotenberg, 2001. "Special EPIC Alert," EPIC Alert, volume 8, number 18 (24 September), at http://www.epic.org/alert/EPIC_Alert_8.18.html, accessed 30 January 2002.
55. J. Rousseau, 1978. On the social contract. New York: St. Martin's.
56. S.M. Schneider, 2000. "Dot-Not candidates," NetElection.org press release of 1 August,at http://www.mail-archive.com/do-wire@tc.umn.edu/ msg00037.html, accessed 30 January 2002.
57. M. Schudson, 1999. "Beyond the informed citizen," Detours, volume 3, number 1 (September), at http://www.prairie.org/detours/ResPublica/ features/Feature4.html, accessed 30 January 2002.
58. L.M. Seidman, 1987. "Public principle and private choice," Yale Law Journal, volume 96, pp. 1006-1059.
59. Shelton v. Tucker (1960). 364 U.S. 479.
60. A. Shen, 1999. "Electronic Privacy Information Center public comment for the FTC Public Workshop on Online Profiling," at http://www.ftc.gov/ bcp/profiling/comments/shen.pdf, accessed 30 January 2002.
61. Spectrum, 2000. "What Americans think: Election information via the internet," Spectrum: The Journal of State Government, volume 74 (Fall), pp. 30-31, and at http://stars.csg.org/spectrum/2001/winter/wi01spec30-31.pdf, accessed 30 January 2002.
62. M. Stepanek, 2000. "How the data-miners want to influence your vote," Business Week (26 October), at http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/ dnflash/oct2000/nf20001026_969.htm, accessed 30 January 2002.
63. Sweezy v. New Hampshire (1957) 354 U.S. 234.
64. Talley v. California (1960) 362 U.S. 60.
65. L. Tien, 1996. "Who's afraid of anonymous speech? McIntyre and the Internet," Oregon Law Review, volume 75, pp. 117-189.
66. Tocqueville, A. de, 1969. Democracy in America. Edited by J. P. Mayer. A new translation of De la démocratie en Amérique by George Lawrence. New York: Doubleday.
67. J. Turow, 1997. Breaking up America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68. B. Vaida, 2001. "FEC not likely to address net issues in 2001," National Journal's Technology Daily (2 February).
69. L. Wayne, 2000. "Voter profiles selling briskly as privacy issues are raised," New York Times (9 September), p. A1.
70. L. Weinstein, 1999. "Web tracking and data matching hit the campaign trail," PRIVACY Forum Digest, volume 8, issue 22 (24 December), at http://www.vortex.com/privacy/priv.08.22, accessed 30 January 2002.
71. J. Weintraub, 1997. "The Theory and politics of the public/private distinction," In: Jeff Weintraub and Krishan Kumar (editors). Public and private in thought and practice: Perspectives on a grand dichotomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-42.
72. R. Whitaker, 1999. The End of privacy. New York: New Press.