Proposing a knowledge exchange model for scholarly publishing

Current Issues in Education

Volumn 3, Issue , 2000, Pages

  Willinsky, John ^a,b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Ctr Stud Curriculum and Instruct   (Canada)

^d SEATTLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011701771     PISSN: 1099839X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arnold, K. (1996). The body in the virtual library: Rethinking scholarly communication. In Eds. T. M. Harrison and T. Stephen, Computer networking and scholarly communication in the twenty-first-century university (pp. 383-397). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
2. Association of Research Libraries (ARL). (2000a). Principles for Emerging Systems of Scholarly Publishing. Available: http://www.arl.org/scomm/tempe.html.
3. Association of Research Libraries (ARL). (2000b). Create change: A resource for faculty and librarian action to reclaim scholarly communication. Washington, DC. Available: http://www.arl.org/create/home.html.
4. Bennett, D. C. (1997). New connections for scholars: The changing missions of a learned society in an era of digital networks. Occasional Paper, No. 36.Washington, DC: American Council of Learned Societies.
5. Bohman, J. (1996). Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Buck, A.M., Flagan R. C., and Coles, B. (1999). Scholars' Forum: A new model for scholarly communication. California Institute of Technology. Available: http://library.caltech.edu/publications/scholarsforum/default.htm.
7. Carlson, S. (2000, August 10). Columbia's Fathom site attracts 4 more prominent partners. Chronicle of Higher Education. Available: http://chronicle.com/free/2000/08/2000081002u.htm.
8. Case, M. M. (n.d.). ARL promotes competition through SPARC: The Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition. Association of Research Libraries. Washington, DC Available: http://www.arl.org/newsltr/196/sparc.html.
9. Danner, D. and Taylor, P. W. (1997). Principle and practicality: Funding electronic access to Washington State government information. Journal of Government Information, 24(5), 347-359.
10. Evans, A. T., McNutt, R. A., Fletcher, S. W. Fletcher, R. H. (1993). Characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good reviews. In Programs and Abstracts of Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publications (p. 11). Chicago, IL.
11. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun, Ed., Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Freudenheim, M. (2000, May 30). New web sites altering visits to patients. New York Times, pp. A1, C14.
13. Ginsparg, P., Luce, R., and Van de Sompel, H. (1999). First meeting of the Open Archives initiative, Santa Fe, New Mexico, US, October 21-22. Available: http://www.openarchives.org/ups1-press.htm.
14. Glass, G. V. (2000). Anonymous FTP: Can we risk it? Dare we publish pre-prints? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Conference, New Orleans. Available: http://glass.ed.asu.edu/gene/papers/aera2000.
15. Guernsey, L. (2000, July 18). Books by the chapter or verse arrive on the internet this fall. New York Times, p. A1, C6.
16. Harnad, S. (1997). Learned inquiry and the net: The role of peer review, peer commentary and copyright. Beyond print: Scholarly publishing and communication in the electronic environment, University of Toronto. Available: http://citd.scar.utoronto.ca/Epub/talks/Harnad_Snider.html.
17. Hjørland, B. (1998). The classification of psychology: A case study in the classification of a knowledge field. Knowledge Organization, 25(4), 162-201.
18. Illich, I. (1997). In the vineyard of the text: A commentary to Hugh's Didascalicon. Chicago: University of Chicago.
19. Johnson, R. (2000 May). A question of access: SPARC, BioOne, and society-driven electronic publishing. D-Lib Magazine, 6(5). Available: http//:www.dlib/may00/Johnson/05johnson.html.
20. Judon, H. F. (1994). Structural transformation of the sciences and the end of peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 92-94.
21. Kaser, R. T. (2000, May). If information wants to be free. . .Then who's going to pay for it. D-Lib Magazine. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/.
22. Krechmer, K. (1996 January). Recommendations for the global information highway: A matter of standards. Information Standards Quarterly, 8(1), 1-5.
23. Lageman, E. C. (1989). The politics of knowledge: The Carnegie Corporation, philanthropy, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24. Leavy, A. M. & Ganesh, T. G. (2000, February 1). The nascent promise of ejournals: Instances of pioneering use of technology. Current Issues in Education [On-line], 3(1). Available: http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume3/number1/.
25. Logoze, C. and Fielding, D. (1998, November). Defining collections in distributed digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/.
26. Lubchenco, J. (1998). Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science, Science, 279, 495-501.
27. Markoff, J. (2000, July 20). High-tech executives urge action on world's digital divide. New York Times, p. A6.
28. Oldenburg, H. (1665, March 6). Introduction. Philosophical Transactions, p. 1.
29. Olsen, F. (2000, June 30), Two digital libraries in California form partnership to expand services. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A41.
30. Robinson, J. (2000). Turner plans $1.2 billion expansion and more CNN Online. New York Times, p. C7.
31. Rosenbaum, R. (2000, August 6). The play's the thing, again. New York Times Book Review, pp. 12-13.
32. Scholars' Forum Discussion (SFD). (1999). Attached to Buck, A.M., Flagan R. C., and Coles, B. Scholars' Forum: A new model for scholarly communication. California Institute of Technology. Available: http://library.caltech.edu/publications/scholarsforum.
33. Schulenburger, D. E. (1998). Moving with dispatch to resolve the scholarly communication crisis: From here to NEAR. Association of Research Libraries Proceedings. Available: http://www.arl.org/arl/proceedings/133/schulenburger.html.
34. Shirky, C. (2000, July 15). Freedom, one song at a time. New York Times, p. A27.
35. Smith, J. W. T. (2000). The deconstructed journal - a new model for academic publishing. Learned Publishing, 12, 79-91.
36. Smith, M.C. (1994). Social Science in the crucible: The American debate over objectivity and purpose, 1918 - 1941. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
37. Sosteric, M. (1999, February). ICAAP extended Markup Language: Exploiting XML and adding value to the journal production process. D-Lib Magazine, 5(2). Available: http:// www.dlib.org/dlib.
38. Tennant, R. (2000, May 15). Accessing electronic theses: Progress? Library Journal, pp. 30-31.
39. Van de Sompel, H. et al. (2000). The UPS prototype: An experimental end-user service across e-print archives. D-Lib Magazine, 6(2). Available: http:// www.dlib.org/dlib.
40. Van de Sompel, H. and Hochstenbach, P. (1999). Reference linking in hybrid library environments. Parts 1-3. D-Lib Magazine, 5(4), 5(10). Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib.
41. Van de Sompel, H. and Lagoze, C. (2000) The Santa Fe Convention of the Open Archives Initiative. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february00/vandesompel-oai/02vandesompel-oai.html.
42. Veltman, K. H. (1997). Frontiers in conceptual navigation. Knowledge Organization, 24(4), 225-245.
43. Vrasidas, C. (2000, July 13) Promises of electronic forms of data representation and scholarly publication. Teachers College Record, Available: http://www.tcrecord.org/.
44. Willams, R. (1961). The long revolution. London: Chatto and Windus.
45. Willinsky, J. (2000). If only we knew: Increasing the public value of Social Science research. New York: Routledge.
46. Willinsky, J. (1999). Technologies of knowing: A proposal for the human sciences. Boston: Beacon.