The interpretations of library use in the age of digital libraries: Virtualizing the name

Library and Information Science Research

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 35-51

  Ercegovac, Zorana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011653235     PISSN: 07408188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0740-8188(97)90004-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anglo-American cataloguing rules. 2nd ed. 1988;American Library Association, Chicago.
2. Bates Marcia J. The design of databases and other information resources for humanities scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report No. 4. Online & CDROM Review. 18:1994;331-340.
3. Belkin Nicholas J., Croft Bruce W. Information filtering and information retrieval: Two sides of the same coin? Communication of the ACM. 35:1992;29-38.
4. Bookstein Abraham. Sources of error in library questionnaires. Library Research. 4:1982;85-94.
5. Borgman Christine L. All users of information retrieval systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual differences. Information Processing & Management. 25:1989;237-251.
6. Borko Harold. Measuring the reliability of subject classification by men and machines. American Documentation. 15:1964;268-273.
7. Buckland Michael K. Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42:1991;351-360.
8. Buckland Michael K., Ziming Liu. History of information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 30:1995;385-416.
9. Cognitive and Software Development. 1995; The entire issue of Communications of the ACM, 38, is devoted to the various topics about cognition as applied to software development.
10. Coates E.J. Switching languages for indexing. Journal of Documentation. 26:1970;102-121.
11. Davenport Elisabeth, McKim Goeffrey. Groupware. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 30:1995;115-159.
12. Dervin Brenda, Dewdney Patricia. Neutral questioning: A new approach to the reference interview. RQ. 25:1986;506-513.
13. Digital Library Initiative. 1996; The entire May issue of Computer, 29(5) of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IEEE) is devoted to the various design and development topics of large-scale digital libraries. Six university sites, sponsored by the National Science Foundation, Advanced Research Projects Agency, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, are the main theme features of this Computer issue.
14. 4): Design principles. College & Research Libraries. 56:1995;249-257.
15. Foskett Anthony Charles. The subject approach to information. 4th ed. 1982;Linnet Books, Hamden, CT.
16. Garland Kathleen. An experiment in automatic hierarchical document classification. Information Processing & Management. 19:1983;113-120.
17. Harter Steven P. Probabilistic approach to automatic indexing - Part 1: On the distribution of specialty words in a technical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 26:1975a;197-206.
18. Harter Steven P. A probabilistic approach to automatic keyword indexing - Part 2: An algorithm for probabilistic indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 26:1975b;280-289.
19. Intelligent Agents. 1994; The entire issue of Communications of the ACM, 37, is devoted to the topic of intelligent agents in information retrieval.
20. Kuhn S. Thomas. The structure of scientific revolutions. 1970;The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
21. Lancaster F.W., Connell Tschera Harkness, Bishop Nancy, McCowan Sherry. Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs. Library Resources and Technical Services. 35:1991;377-391.
22. Library of Congress MARC Development Office, Maps. A MARC format. 1976;Library of Congress Information Systems Office, Washington, D.C.
23. Lossee R.M. Jr. Seven fundamental questions for the science of library classification. Knowledge Organization. 20:1993;65-70.
24. Lubetzky Seymore. Cataloging rules and principles: A critique of the A.L.A. rules for entry and a proposed design for their revision. 1953;Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.
25. Marchionini Gary, Maurer Hermann. The roles of digital libraries in teaching and learning. Communications of the ACM. 38:1995;67-75.
26. Ogle Virginia E., Stonebracker Michael. Chabot: Retrieval from a relational database of images. Computer. 28:1995;40-48.
27. O'Neill Edward T., Vizine-Goetz Diane. Bibliographic relationships: implications for the function of the catalog. Svenonius Elaine. The conceptual foundation of descriptive cataloging. 1989;167-179 Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
28. Robertson Steven E. The probability ranking principle in IR. Journal of Documentation. 33:1977;294-304.
29. Salton Gerald, McGill Michael J. ntroduction to modern information retrieval. 1983;McGraw-Hill, New York.
30. Samuelson Pamela. Copyright and digital libraries. Communications of the ACM. 38:1995;15 ff.
31. Shera Jesse Hauk. Changing concepts of classification: Philosophical and educational implications. Knowing books and men: Knowing computers, too. 1973;327-337 Libraries Unlimited, Littleton, CO.
32. Smith Terence R. A digital library for geographically referenced materials. Computer. 29:1996;54-60.
33. Sparck Jones K. Automatic indexing. Journal of Documentation. 4:1974;393-432.
34. Tillett Barbara B. Bibliographic structures: The evolution of catalog entries, references, and tracings. Svenonius Elaine. The conceptual foundation of descriptive cataloging. 1989;149-165 Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
35. Turtle Howard, William B. Croft. Evaluation of an inference networkbased retrieval model. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 3:1991;187-222.
36. U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee. Content standards for digital geospatial metadata. 1994;U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
37. Van Rijsbergen C.J. Information retrieval. 2nd ed. 1979;Butterworths, Boston.