A new linear solvation energy relationship for the solubility of liquids in water

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 348-350

  Lee, Sun Bok ^a  

^a Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DRUG SOLUBILITY; ENERGY METABOLISM; HYDROGEN BOND; PH; VAPORIZATION; WATER ANALYSIS;

EID: 0011623032     PISSN: 00223549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/js950228y     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kamlet, M. J.; Doherty, R. M.; Abboud, J.-L. M.; Abraham, M. H.; Taft, R. W. J. Pharm. Sci. 1986, 75, 338-349.
2. Taft, R. W.; Abraham, M. H.; Doherty, R. M.; Kamlet, M. J. Nature 1985, 313, 384-386.
3. Kamlet, M. J.; Doherty, R. M.; Abraham, M. H.; Carr, P. W.; Doherty, R. F.; Taft, R. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 1996-2004.
4. Kamlet, M. J.; Carr, P. W.; Taft, R. W.; Abraham, M. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6062-6066.
5. Kamlet, M. J.; Doherty, R.; Abboud, J.-L. M.; Taft, R. W. CHEMTECH 1986, 16, 566-576.
6. Rawls, R. Chem. Eng. News, 1985, March 18, 20.
7. There has been a considerable discussion on the question whether LSER's are really fundamental laws or local empirical rules, as can be found from the following references: Sjostrom, M.; Wold, S. Acta Chem. Scand. 1981, B35, 537-554; Kamlet, M. J.; Taft, R. W. Acta Chem. Scand. 1985, B39, 611-.628; Wold, S.; Sjostrom, M. Acta Chem. Scand. 1986, B40, 270-277; Kamlet, M. J.; Doherty, R. M.; Famini, G. R.; Taft, R. W. Acta Chem. Scand. 1987, B41, 589-598.
8. There has been a considerable discussion on the question whether LSER's are really fundamental laws or local empirical rules, as can be found from the following references: Sjostrom, M.; Wold, S. Acta Chem. Scand. 1981, B35, 537-554; Kamlet, M. J.; Taft, R. W. Acta Chem. Scand. 1985, B39, 611-.628; Wold, S.; Sjostrom, M. Acta Chem. Scand. 1986, B40, 270-277; Kamlet, M. J.; Doherty, R. M.; Famini, G. R.; Taft, R. W. Acta Chem. Scand. 1987, B41, 589-598.
9. There has been a considerable discussion on the question whether LSER's are really fundamental laws or local empirical rules, as can be found from the following references: Sjostrom, M.; Wold, S. Acta Chem. Scand. 1981, B35, 537-554; Kamlet, M. J.; Taft, R. W. Acta Chem. Scand. 1985, B39, 611-.628; Wold, S.; Sjostrom, M. Acta Chem. Scand. 1986, B40, 270-277; Kamlet, M. J.; Doherty, R. M.; Famini, G. R.; Taft, R. W. Acta Chem. Scand. 1987, B41, 589-598.
10. There has been a considerable discussion on the question whether LSER's are really fundamental laws or local empirical rules, as can be found from the following references: Sjostrom, M.; Wold, S. Acta Chem. Scand. 1981, B35, 537-554; Kamlet, M. J.; Taft, R. W. Acta Chem. Scand. 1985, B39, 611-.628; Wold, S.; Sjostrom, M. Acta Chem. Scand. 1986, B40, 270-277; Kamlet, M. J.; Doherty, R. M.; Famini, G. R.; Taft, R. W. Acta Chem. Scand. 1987, B41, 589-598.
11. Karger, B. L.; Snyder, L. R.; Eon, C. J. Chromatogr. 1976, 125, 71-88; Karger, B. L.; Snyder, L. R.; Eon, C. Anal. Chem. 1978, 50, 2126-2136.
12. Karger, B. L.; Snyder, L. R.; Eon, C. J. Chromatogr. 1976, 125, 71-88; Karger, B. L.; Snyder, L. R.; Eon, C. Anal. Chem. 1978, 50, 2126-2136.
13. Tijssen, R.; Billiet, H. A. H.; Schoenmakers, P. J. J. Chromatogr. 1976, 122, 185-203.
14. Beerbower, A.; Wu, P. L.; Martin, A. J. Pharm. Sci. 1984, 73, 179-188.
15. Barton, A. F. M. Handbook of Solubility Parameters and Other Cohesion Parameters, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1991.
16. Hildebrand, J. H.; Scott, R. L. The Solubility of Nonelectrolytes, 3rd ed.; Dover Publications: New York, 1964.
17. 2 for the 4SPM. In this case, the resulting relationships are apparently identical and a term-by-term correspondence between the two equations can be identified.
18. Abraham, M. H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 73-83.
19. Li, J; Zhang, Y.; Dallas, A. J.; Carr, P. W. J. Chromatogr. 1991, 550, 101-134.
20. Dean, J. A. Lange's Handbook of Chemistry 14th ed.; McGrawHill: New York, 1992.
21. 2 parameter does not influence the significance of the coefficients.
22. 2 (A2) for which n = 55, r = 0.9884, and SD = 0.245. As can be seen from eq A2, the exclusion of the solute acidity term results in the loss of the statistical significance of the solute-solute interaction term.
23. Abraham, M. H; Andonian-Haftvan, J.; Whiting, G. S.; Leo, A.; Taft, R. S. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 1777-1791.
24. Myrdal, P. B.; Manka, A. M.; Yalkowsky, S. H. Chemosphere 1993, 30, 1619-1637.
25. Nelson, T. M.; Jurs, P. C. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 601-609.